High order one-step monotonicity-preserving schemes for unsteady compressible flow calculations

This paper deals with the development of accurate one-step schemes for the numerical simulation of unsteady compressible flows. Pursuing our work in Daru and Tenaud [V. Daru, C. Tenaud, Comput. Fluids 30 (2001) 89] where third-order schemes were considered, we follow the Lax-Wendroff approach to develop high order TVD combined time-space schemes by correcting the successive modified equations. In the scalar case, TVD schemes accurate up to seventh order (OSTVD7) in time and space are obtained (in smooth regions and away from extrema). To avoid the clipping and the loss of accuracy that is common to the TVD schemes near extrema, we develop monotonicitypreserving (MP) conditions derived from Suresh and Huynh [A. Suresh, H.T. Huynh, J. Comput. Phys. 136 (1997) 83] to locally relax the TVD limitation for this family of one-step schemes. Numerical results for long time integration in the scalar case show that the MP one-step approach gives the best results compared to sever multistate schemes, including WENO schemes. The extension to systems and to the multidimensional case is done in a simplified way which does not preserve the scalar order of accuracy. However we show that the resulting schemes have a very low level of error. For validation, the present algorithm has been checked on several classical one-dimensional and multidimensional test cases, including both viscous and inviscid flows: a moving shock wave interacting with a sine wave, the Lax shock tube problem, the 2D inviscid double Mach reflection and the 2D viscous shock wave-vortex interaction. By computing these various test cases, we demonstrate that very accurate results can be obtained by using the one-step MP approach which is very competitive compared to multistage high order schemes.

[1]  P. Lax,et al.  Systems of conservation laws , 1960 .

[2]  H. Huynh,et al.  Accurate Monotonicity-Preserving Schemes with Runge-Kutta Time Stepping , 1997 .

[3]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  A Well-Behaved TVD Limiter for High-Resolution Calculations of Unsteady Flow , 1997 .

[4]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Evaluation of some high‐order shock capturing schemes for direct numerical simulation of unsteady two‐dimensional free flows , 2000 .

[5]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  The Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Conservation Laws V , 1998 .

[6]  Chi-Wang Shu.  Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws , 1998 .

[7]  Chi-Wang Shu.  TVB uniformly high-order schemes for conservation laws , 1987 .

[8]  Björn Sjögreen,et al.  Grid convergence of high order methods for multiscale complex unsteady viscous compressible flows , 2001 .

[9]  Gordon Erlebacher,et al.  High-order ENO schemes applied to two- and three-dimensional compressible flow , 1992 .

[10]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Shock-Turbulence Interaction , 2004 .

[11]  Christian Tenaud,et al.  Evaluation of TVD high resolution schemes for unsteady viscous shocked flows , 2000 .

[12]  Eleuterio F. Toro,et al.  ADER: Arbitrary High Order Godunov Approach , 2002, J. Sci. Comput..

[13]  C. Bernardi,et al.  Approximations spectrales de problèmes aux limites elliptiques , 2003 .

[14]  R. Peyret.  Spectral Methods for Incompressible Viscous Flow , 2002 .

[15]  K. Khalfallah,et al.  Correction d'entropie pour des schémas numériques approchant un système hyperbolique , 1989 .

[16]  Jay Casper,et al.  Finite-volume implementation of high-order essentially nonoscillatory schemes in two dimensions , 1992 .

[17]  S. Osher,et al.  Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, 111 , 1987 .

[18]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Monotonicity Preserving Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes with Increasingly High Order of Accuracy , 2000 .

[19]  Freda Porter-Locklear.  Large eddy simulations of compressible turbulent flows , 1995 .

[20]  Krishnan Mahesh,et al.  High order finite difference schemes with good spectral resolution , 1997 .

[21]  D. Andrews,et al.  A relaxation method for solving nonlinear stress equilibrium problems , 1973 .

[22]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of the Shock/Turbulence Interaction , 1999 .

[23]  D. Knight,et al.  Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions , 2003 .

[24]  P. Woodward,et al.  The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks , 1984 .

[25]  S. Lele.  Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[26]  T. A. Zang,et al.  Spectral methods for fluid dynamics , 1987 .

[27]  S. Osher,et al.  Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes,II , 1989 .

[28]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes , 1995 .

[29]  Sangsan Lee,et al.  Large eddy simulation of shock turbulence interaction , 1993 .

[30]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection , 1991 .

[31]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[32]  Marcel Lesieur,et al.  Large-eddy simulations of compressible turbulent flows , 1998 .