A Quantitative Evaluation of Drive Pattern Selection for Optimizing EIT-Based Stretchable Sensors

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a medical imaging technique that has been recently used to realize stretchable pressure sensors. In this method, voltage measurements are taken at electrodes placed at the boundary of the sensor and are used to reconstruct an image of the applied touch pressure points. The drawback with EIT-based sensors, however, is their low spatial resolution due to the ill-posed nature of the EIT reconstruction. In this paper, we show our performance evaluation of different EIT drive patterns, specifically strategies for electrode selection when performing current injection and voltage measurements. We compare voltage data with Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Boundary Voltage Changes (BVC), and study image quality with Size Error (SE), Position Error (PE) and Ringing (RNG) parameters, in the case of one-point and two-point simultaneous contact locations. The study shows that, in order to improve the performance of EIT based sensors, the electrode selection strategies should dynamically change correspondingly to the location of the input stimuli. In fact, the selection of one drive pattern over another can improve the target size detection and position accuracy up to 4.7% and 18%, respectively.

[1]  E. Thostenson,et al.  Spatial damage detection in electrically anisotropic fiber-reinforced composites using carbon nanotube networks , 2016 .

[2]  Luigi Villani,et al.  A Conformable Force/Tactile Skin for Physical Human–Robot Interaction , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[3]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[4]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  A Matlab toolkit for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the Electrical Impedance and Diffuse Optical Reconstruction Software project , 2002 .

[5]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  A highly stretchable tactile distribution sensor for smooth surfaced humanoids , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[6]  Samia Nefti-Meziani,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of Drive Patterns in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2016, MobiHealth.

[7]  X. Tao,et al.  Conductive knitted fabric as large-strain gauge under high temperature , 2006 .

[8]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  A deformable and deformation sensitive tactile distribution sensor , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[9]  Mari Velonaki,et al.  Interpretation of the modality of touch on an artificial arm covered with an EIT-based sensitive skin , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Renato Seiji Tavares,et al.  Influence of current injection pattern and electric potential measurement strategies in electrical impedance tomography , 2017 .

[11]  Suleman Mazhar,et al.  Analysing the performance of EIT images using the point spread function , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET).

[12]  Arto Voutilainen,et al.  Optimal current patterns in dynamical electrical impedance tomography imaging , 2007 .

[13]  Andy Adler,et al.  A Resistive Mesh Phantom for Assessing the Performance of EIT Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  K. W. Wang,et al.  Damage detection and conductivity evolution in carbon nanofiber epoxy via electrical impedance tomography , 2014 .

[15]  Manuchehr Soleimani,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography for Artificial Sensitive Robotic Skin: A Review , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[16]  Xuetao Shi,et al.  Comparison of Drive Patterns for Single Current Source EIT in Computational Phantom , 2008, 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Andy Adler,et al.  Evaluation of EIT system performance , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[18]  Marc Bodenstein,et al.  Principles of electrical impedance tomography and its clinical application , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[19]  Li Li,et al.  A Resistive Network Model for Conductive Knitting Stitches , 2010 .

[20]  Hongbo Wang,et al.  Design Methodology for Magnetic Field-Based Soft Tri-Axis Tactile Sensors , 2016, Sensors.

[21]  B H Brown,et al.  The Sheffield data collection system. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[22]  D. Geselowitz An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography. , 1971, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[23]  Kon-Well Wang,et al.  Tactile imaging and distributed strain sensing in highly flexible carbon nanofiber/polyurethane nanocomposites , 2015 .

[24]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Design and Characterization of a Three-Axis Hall Effect-Based Soft Skin Sensor , 2016, Sensors.

[25]  B. Brandstatter,et al.  Jacobian calculation for electrical impedance tomography based on the reciprocity principle , 2003 .

[26]  David S. Holder,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography : Methods, History and Applications , 2004 .

[27]  B.H. Brown,et al.  A real-time electrical impedance tomography system for clinical use-design and preliminary results , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  William R B Lionheart EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[29]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Studying the resistivity imaging of chicken tissue phantoms with different current patterns in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) , 2012 .

[30]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[31]  D. Isaacson Distinguishability of Conductivities by Electric Current Computed Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  R. T. Lipczynski,et al.  The Use Of Eit Techniques To Measure Interface Pressure , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  Xuetao Shi,et al.  Pseudo-polar drive patterns for brain electrical impedance tomography , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[34]  J P Kaipio,et al.  Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns. , 1997, Physiological measurement.

[35]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  On optimal current patterns for electrical impedance tomography , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  E. W. Randall,et al.  A 1000-measurement frames/second ERT data capture system with real-time visualization , 2005, IEEE Sensors Journal.