Democratic Process in Online Crowds and Communities

This paper explores the underlying structures that support participation and reputation in online crowd and community-based peer productions. Building on writings on open source, peer production, participatory culture, and social networks, the paper describes crowd and community structures as two ends of a continuum of collective action - from lightweight to heavyweight - differentiated by the extent of connectivity and engagement between contributions and among contributors. This is followed by an examination of the recognition, reputation and reward systems that support these collectives, and how these affect who controls and who contributes information. The aim of this exploration is to gain insight for understanding motivations and structures for e-participation in these different, potentially democratic, forums.

[1]  N. Budhathoki.  Participants' motivations to contribute geographic information in an online community , 2010 .

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Building Virtual Communities: The Mystery of the Death of MediaMOO: Seven Years of Evolution of an Online Community , 2002 .

[5]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[6]  C. Haythornthwaite.  Online Knowledge Crowds and Communities , 2009 .

[7]  Fang Wu,et al.  Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology , 2007 .

[9]  S. R. Hiltz.  Online communities , 1983 .

[10]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[11]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Design, Theory, and Practice , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth , 2009 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[14]  John Willinsky,et al.  The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science , 2005, First Monday.

[15]  John Scott,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis , 2011 .

[16]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[17]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  FOSTERING INTRANET KNOWLEDGE- SHARING: AN INTEGRATION OF TRANSACTIVE MEMORY AND PUBLIC GOODS APPROACHES , 2001 .

[18]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production , 2009 .

[19]  C. Haythornthwaite,et al.  Motivation for Open Collaboration , 2013 .

[20]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[21]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre and the new rhetoric , 1995 .

[22]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[23]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[24]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Common Wisdom: Peer Production of Educational Materials, Center for Open and Sustainable Learning , 2005 .

[25]  N. Lin.  Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[26]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[27]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Challenges for Research and Practice in Distributed, Interdisciplinary Collaboration , 2006 .

[28]  C. Haythornthwaite.  Social networks and online community , 2009 .

[29]  Aviva Freedman,et al.  Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre , 2003 .

[30]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The Cathedral & the Bazaar , 1999 .

[31]  Paul Duguid,et al.  Limits of self-organization: Peer production and "laws of quality" , 2006, First Monday.

[32]  R. Moreland.  Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[33]  L. Kendall.  Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online , 2002 .

[34]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .