A cognitive analytics management framework for the transformation of electronic government services from users' perspective to create sustainable shared values

Abstract Electronic government services (e-services) involve the delivery of information and services to stakeholders via the Internet, Internet of Things and other traditional modes. Despite their beneficial values, the overall level of usage (take-up) remains relatively low compared to traditional modes. They are also challenging to evaluate due to behavioral, economical, political, and technical aspects. The literature lacks a methodology framework to guide the government transformation application to improve both internal processes of e-services and institutional transformation to advance relationships with stakeholders. This paper proposes a cognitive analytics management (CAM) framework to implement such transformations. The ambition is to increase users’ take-up rate and satisfaction, and create sustainable shared values through provision of improved e-services. The CAM framework uses cognition to understand and frame the transformation challenge into analytics terms. Analytics insights for improvements are generated using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). A classification and regression tree is then applied to DEA results to identify characteristics of satisfaction to advance relationships. The importance of senior management is highlighted for setting strategic goals and providing various executive supports. The CAM application for the transforming Turkish e-services is validated on a large sample data using online survey. The results are discussed; the outcomes and impacts are reported in terms of estimated savings of more than fifteen billion dollars over a ten-year period and increased usage of improved new e-services. We conclude with future research.

[1]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[3]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[4]  Chun-Ling Chuang,et al.  An Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Model Reinforced by Classification and Regression Tree for Hospital Performance Evaluation , 2011, Journal of Medical Systems.

[5]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Equity theory: A review and critique. , 1969 .

[6]  Zahir Irani,et al.  I-MEET FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION E-GOVERNMENT SERVICES FROM ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS’ PERSPECTIVES , 2014 .

[7]  Ana S. Camanho,et al.  Competitive positioning and performance assessment in the construction industry , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  Misplaced Trust? Exploring the Structure of the E-Government-Citizen Trust Relationship , 2011 .

[9]  Paolo Mancuso,et al.  Uncover the predictive structure of healthcare efficiency applying a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Martin Eling,et al.  The Determinants of Efficiency and Productivity in the Swiss Insurance Industry , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  George Strawn,et al.  Data Scientist , 2016, IT Professional.

[13]  Matt Eyring,et al.  Nuevos modelos de negocios en los mercados emergentes , 2011 .

[14]  Alberto Guillén,et al.  Analysing user trust in electronic banking using data mining methods , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Dharmendra S. Modha,et al.  Cognitive Computing , 2011, Informatik-Spektrum.

[16]  Kristof De Witte,et al.  Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from local public libraries , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  Operational research from Taylorism to Terabytes: A research agenda for the analytics age , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Yu-Che Chen,et al.  Citizen-Centric E-Government Services: Understanding Integrated Citizen Service Information Systems , 2010 .

[19]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Introduction to performance improvement management software (PIM-DEA) , 2013 .

[20]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[21]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Model for the Appraisal and Relative Performance Evaluation of Nurses at an Intensive Care Unit , 2010, Journal of Medical Systems.

[22]  Jinxing Shen,et al.  Discrete Hopfield Neural Networks for Evaluating Service Quality of Public Transit , 2014, MUE 2014.

[23]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[25]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  The Scholarly Literature on E-Government: Characterizing a Nascent Field , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[26]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[27]  T. Davenport Competing on analytics. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[28]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[29]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Yueping Zheng,et al.  Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Use: the Role of Perceived Advantages , 2017 .

[31]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  G. G. Ryzin,et al.  IMPORTANCE‐PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEYS , 2007 .

[33]  Leonard Gordon,et al.  Using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) in SAS® Enterprise Miner TM For Applications in Public Health. , 2013 .

[34]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Benchmarking of service quality with data envelopment analysis , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  Strategy, performance and operational research , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[36]  Gino Verleye,et al.  User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[37]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[38]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees , 2014 .

[39]  Rocío de Oña,et al.  Key factors affecting rail service quality in the Northern Italy: a decision tree approach , 2014 .

[40]  Gregoris Mentzas,et al.  SALT: A semantic adaptive framework for monitoring citizen satisfaction from e-government services , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[41]  Ibrahim H. Osman,et al.  A Cognitive Analytics Management Framework (CAM-Part 1): SAMAS Components, Leadership, Frontier Performance Growth, and Sustainable Shared Value , 2014 .

[42]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  The assessment of user-perceived web quality: Application of a satisfaction benchmarking approach , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Data envelopment analysis in the public sector , 2014 .

[45]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  Intelligent Measuring and Improving Model for Customer Satisfaction Level in e-Government , 2005, EGOV.

[46]  K. Sam Park,et al.  Duality, efficiency computations and interpretations in imprecise DEA , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[48]  A Cognitive Analytics Management Framework (CAM-Part 3): Critical Skills Shortage, Higher Education Trends, Education Value Chain Framework, Government Strategy , 2014 .

[49]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  Management challenges in creating value from business analytics , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  An analysis of methodologies utilised in e-government research: A user satisfaction perspective , 2012, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[51]  Dimitris Askounis,et al.  Assessing e-Participation via user’s satisfaction measurement: the case of OurSpace platform , 2015, Annals of Operations Research.

[52]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[53]  Alina M. Chircu E-government evaluation: towards a multidimensional framework , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[54]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Citizen's adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT) , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Evaluating and modelling constructs for e-government decision making , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[56]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Robert Fildes,et al.  Reassessing the scope of OR practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[58]  Mutaz M. Al-Debei,et al.  The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  Jouni Markkula,et al.  EU General Data Protection Regulation: Changes and implications for personal data collecting companies , 2017, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[60]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Affective State Estimation for Human–Robot Interaction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[61]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[62]  Aliyar Esmaeili,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of customer satisfaction index in e-banking using the fuzzy data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[63]  M. Porter,et al.  Creating Shared Value , 2019 .

[64]  I. Afolabi,et al.  ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE USINGCLUSTERING AND ASSOCIATION RULES , 2014 .

[65]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  The University of Bradford Institutional Repository , 2022 .

[66]  Ibrahim H. Osman,et al.  A Cognitive Analytics Management Framework (CAM-Part 2): Societal Needs, Shared-Value Models, Performance Indicators, Big Data, Business Analytics Models and Tools , 2014 .

[67]  I. Afolabi,et al.  ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE USING CLUSTERING AND ASSOCIATION RULES , 2014 .

[68]  Bill Buchanan,et al.  Building the Future of EU: Moving forward with International Collaboration on Blockchain , 2018, The Journal of the British Blockchain Association.

[69]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[70]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with classification and regression tree – a case of banking efficiency , 2010, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[71]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view , 2015, Information Systems Frontiers.

[72]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Research note: Toward a reference process model for citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐Government services , 2008 .

[73]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[74]  Jan Hendrik Wirfs,et al.  The Determinants of Efficiency and Productivity in the Swiss Insurance Industry , 2015 .

[75]  J. Millard eGovernment measurement for policy makers , 2008 .

[76]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Rank order data in DEA: A general framework , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[77]  Arpan Kumar Kar,et al.  Big data with cognitive computing: A review for the future , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[78]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[79]  Tom Pape,et al.  Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[80]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  e-Government stakeholders - Who are they and what do they want? , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[81]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[82]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[83]  Jonathan Crook,et al.  Chinese companies distress prediction: an application of data envelopment analysis , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..