Cost analysis of endodontic treatment in primary teeth: results from a randomized clinical trial.

[1]  M. Braga,et al.  How can we associate an economic evaluation with a clinical trial? , 2020, Brazilian oral research.

[2]  Chia-Yu Chen,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonvital Pulp Therapy for Primary Teeth. , 2020, Pediatric dentistry.

[3]  L. Maia,et al.  Is there evidence for the use of lesion sterilization and tissue repair therapy in the endodontic treatment of primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses , 2020, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[4]  F. Mendes,et al.  Management of deep caries lesions with or without pulp involvement in primary teeth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2020, Brazilian oral research.

[5]  A. Tripathi,et al.  Biomechanical preparation in primary molars using manual and three NiTi instruments: a cone-beam-computed tomographic in vitro study , 2020, European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.

[6]  J. Imparato,et al.  Do Different Proportions of Antibiotics in the CTZ Paste Interfere with the Antimicrobial Action? In Vitro Study , 2019, Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada.

[7]  S. Thakur,et al.  Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic success of three different lesion sterilization and tissue repair techniques as treatment options in primary molars requiring pulpectomy: An in vivo study , 2019, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[8]  Graciela E López,et al.  Evaluation of 3Mix-MP and pulpectomies in non-vital primary molars. , 2019, Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL.

[9]  A. Pintor,et al.  Iodoform Vs Calcium Hydroxide/Zinc Oxide based pastes: 12-month findings of a Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2019, Brazilian oral research.

[10]  F. Schwendicke,et al.  Clinical Recommendations on Carious Tissue Removal in Cavitated Lesions. , 2018, Monographs in oral science.

[11]  M. Braga,et al.  Management of dental caries among children: a look at the cost-effectiveness , 2018, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[12]  W. Marcenes,et al.  Global-, Regional-, and Country-Level Economic Impacts of Dental Diseases in 2015 , 2018, Journal of dental research.

[13]  S. Tomar,et al.  Cost Estimates for Bioactive Cement Pulpotomies and Crowns in Primary Molars. , 2018, Pediatric dentistry.

[14]  R. A. Souza,et al.  Outcome of Single- vs Multiple-visit Endodontic Therapy of Nonvital Teeth: A Meta-analysis. , 2017, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[15]  F. Schwendicke,et al.  Conventional treatment, Hall Technique or immediate pulpotomy for carious primary molars: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[16]  Marcoeli Silva de Moura,et al.  Endodontic Treatment of Primary Molars with Antibiotic Paste: A Report of 38 Cases. , 2016, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[17]  D. Raggio,et al.  Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2016, Trials.

[18]  F. Shiere,et al.  Guideline on Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. , 1961, Pediatric dentistry.

[19]  M. Braga,et al.  Evaluation of the relationship between the cost and properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. , 2016, Brazilian oral research.

[20]  N. Pitts,et al.  The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS™) An Example of a Caries Management Pathway , 2015, BMC oral health.

[21]  T. Lenzi,et al.  Two endodontics techniques analysis in primary molars with fistula , 2015 .

[22]  L. Assunção,et al.  Endodontic Therapy in Primary Teeth by Pediatric Dentists , 2014 .

[23]  K. Hemmings,et al.  The influence of patients' decisions on treatment planning in restorative dentistry. , 2013, Dental update.

[24]  H. M. Ahmed,et al.  Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. , 2013, International endodontic journal.

[25]  M. Drummond,et al.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement , 2013, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[26]  G. Christensen.  Do your patients know the alternatives for their oral care? , 2012, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[27]  M. Yamauti,et al.  Rubber Dam: Use in Private Clinics in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil , 2012 .

[28]  F. Mendes,et al.  Variability in the proportion of components of iodoform-based Guedes-Pinto paste mixed by dental students and pediatric dentists. , 2011, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[29]  B. H. de Oliveira,et al.  A Systematic Review of Root Canal Filling Materials for Deciduous Teeth: Is There an Alternative for Zinc Oxide-Eugenol? , 2010, ISRN dentistry.

[30]  H. Benzian,et al.  PUFA--an index of clinical consequences of untreated dental caries. , 2010, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[31]  C. Feldens,et al.  Antimicrobial Action of Root Canal Filling Materials for Primary Teeth using the Agar Diffusion Method: an In Vitro Study , 2009 .

[32]  N. Saliba,et al.  Atraumatic restorative treatment and its use in public health dentistry , 2008 .

[33]  M. G. Oliveira,et al.  Desempenho clínico de pulpotomias com pasta CTZ em molares decícuos: estudo retrospectivo , 2006 .

[34]  C. Estrela,et al.  Antimicrobial analysis of different root canal filling pastes used in pediatric dentistry by two experimental methods. , 2006, Brazilian dental journal.

[35]  Léa A B Silva,et al.  Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. , 2004, Journal of dentistry for children.