Assessing the impact of total quality management and organizational culture on multiple outcomes of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.

OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of total quality management (TQM) and organizational culture on a comprehensive set of endpoints of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients, including risk-adjusted adverse outcomes, clinical efficiency, patient satisfaction, functional health status, and cost of care. METHODS Prospective cohort study of 3,045 eligible CABG patients from 16 hospitals using risk-adjusted clinical outcomes, functional health status, patient satisfaction, and cost measures. Implementation of TQM was measured by a previously validated instrument based on the Baldridge national quality award criteria. Organizational culture was measured by a previously validated 20-item instrument. Generalized estimating equations were used to control for potential selection bias, repeated measures, and intraclass correlation. RESULTS A 2- to 4-fold difference in all major clinical CABG care endpoints was observed among the 16 hospitals, but little of this variation was associated with TQM or organizational culture. Patients receiving CABG from hospitals with high TQM scores were more satisfied with their nursing care (P = 0.005) but were more likely to have lengths of stay >10 days (P = 0.0003). A supportive group culture was associated with shorter postoperative intubation times (P = 0.01) but longer operating room times (P = 0.004). A supportive group culture was also associated with higher patient physical (P = 0.005) and mental (P = 0.01) functional health status scores 6 months after CABG. CONCLUSIONS There was little effect of TQM and organizational culture on multiple endpoints of care for CABG patients. There is a need to examine further the relationships among individual professional skills and motivations, group and microsystem team processes, specifically tailored interventions, and organization-wide culture, decision support processes, and incentives. Assessing the impact of such multifaceted approaches is an important area for further research.

[1]  S. Shortell,et al.  Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[2]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[3]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. , 1983, Circulation.

[4]  D Blumenthal,et al.  A report card on continuous quality improvement. , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[5]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .

[6]  M. Chassin,et al.  The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  S. Pauker,et al.  Task Force I: Determination of prognosis in patients with ischemic heart disease. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  S M Shortell,et al.  Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: the effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. , 1997, Health services research.

[9]  M A Hlatky,et al.  Comparison of predictions based on observational data with the results of randomized controlled clinical trials of coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  R. Carey,et al.  A Patient Survey System to Measure Quality Improvement: Questionnaire Reliability and Validity , 1993, Medical care.

[11]  D M Berwick,et al.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  R H Brook,et al.  Managed care is not the problem, quality is. , 1997, JAMA.

[13]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[14]  E L Hannan,et al.  Identification of preoperative variables needed for risk adjustment of short-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Working Group Panel on the Cooperative CABG Database Project. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Denison,et al.  Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. , 1991 .

[16]  M. Chassin Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[17]  E. McGlynn,et al.  How good is the quality of health care in the United States? , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[18]  S. Cretin,et al.  Total quality management in hospitals: the contributions of commitment, quality councils, teams, budgets, and training to perceived improvement at Veterans Health Administration hospitals. , 1996, Medical care.

[19]  J. Kotter,et al.  Corporate Culture and Performance , 1992 .

[20]  A. Bernstein,et al.  A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[21]  J. Wennberg,et al.  A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1991, JAMA.

[22]  E. Hannan,et al.  Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality rates. , 1990, JAMA.

[23]  K. Cameron Cultural Congruence, Strength, and Type: Relationships to Effectiveness , 1985 .

[24]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Assessing the needs of breast cancer patients and their families , 1993, Quality management in health care.

[25]  R. Brook,et al.  Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes. , 1995, JAMA.

[26]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Total quality and human resources management: lessons learned from Baldrige Award-winning companies , 1993 .

[27]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[28]  P B Batalden,et al.  Hospital quality trends. A short-form patient-based measure. , 1991, Medical care.

[29]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Quality of health care. Part 6: The role of physicians in the future of quality management. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  E. O'Connor,et al.  Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation. , 1995, Health services research.

[31]  Felix Hernandez,et al.  A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1991 .