Component analysis of a new solid state x-ray image intensifier (SSXII) using photon transfer and instrumentation noise equivalent exposure (INEE) measurements

The SSXII is a novel x-ray imager designed to improve upon the performance limitations of conventional dynamic radiographic/fluoroscopic imagers related to resolution, charge-trapping, frame-rate, and instrumentation-noise. The SSXII consists of a CsI:Tl phosphor coupled via a fiber-optic taper (FOT) to an electron-multiplying CCD (EMCCD). To facilitate investigational studies, initial designs enable interchangeability of such imaging components. Measurements of various component and configuration characteristics enable an optimization analysis with respect to overall detector performance. Photon transfer was used to characterize the EMCCD performance including ADC sensitivity, read-noise, full-well capacity and quantum efficiency. X-ray sensitivity was measured using RQA x-ray spectra. Imaging components were analyzed in terms of their MTF and transmission efficiency. The EMCCD was measured to have a very low effective read-noise of less than 1 electron rms at modest EMCCD gains, which is more than two orders-ofmagnitude less than flat panel (FPD) and CMOS-based detectors. The variable signal amplification from 1 to 2000 times enables selectable sensitivities ranging from 8.5 (168) to over 15k (300k) electrons per incident x-ray photon with (without) a 4:1 FOT; these sensitivities could be readily increased with further component optimization. MTF and DQE measurements indicate the SSXII performance is comparable to current state-of-the-art detectors at low spatial frequencies and far exceeds them at higher spatial frequencies. The instrumentation noise equivalent exposure (INEE) was measured to be less than 0.3 μR out to 10 cycles/mm, which is substantially better than FPDs. Component analysis suggests that these improvements can be substantially increased with further detector optimization.

[1]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  MO‐E‐332‐07: Instrumentation Noise Equivalent Exposure (INEE) for Routine Quality Assurance: INEE Measurements On a Clinical Flat Panel Detector , 2008 .

[2]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Progress in electron-multiplying CCD (EMCCD) based high-resolution high-sensitivity x-ray detector for fluoroscopy and radiography , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Ehsan Samei Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Endovascular image-guided interventions (EIGIs). , 2007, Medical physics.

[5]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  WE‐C‐L100J‐06: Linear Systems Analysis for a New Solid State X‐Ray Image Intensifier (SSXII) Based On Electron‐Multiplying Charge‐Coupled Devices (EMCCDs) , 2007 .

[6]  Michael J. DeWeert,et al.  Photon transfer methods and results for electron multiplication CCDs , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[7]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  WE‐C‐L100J‐03: The New Solid State X‐Ray Image Intensifier (SSXII): A Demonstration of Operation Over a Range of Angiographic and Fluoroscopic Exposure Levels , 2007 .

[8]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  New light-amplifier-based detector designs for high spatial resolution and high sensitivity CBCT mammography and fluoroscopy , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  WE‐C‐L100J‐04: The Solid State X‐Ray Image Intensifier (SSXII): A Next‐Generation High‐Resolution Fluoroscopic Detector System , 2007 .

[10]  J. Janesick,et al.  Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices , 2001 .

[11]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  New microangiography system development providing improved small vessel imaging, increased contrast-to-noise ratios, and multiview 3D reconstructions , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Microangiographic image-guided localization of a new asymmetric stent for treatment of cerebral aneurysms , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. , 2006, Medical physics.

[15]  Yi Wang,et al.  Exploration of the potential performance of polycrystalline silicon-based active matrix flat-panel imagers incorporating active pixel sensor architectures , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors. , 2007, Medical physics.

[17]  S Rudin,et al.  A practical exposure-equivalent metric for instrumentation noise in x-ray imaging systems. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[19]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  The solid state x-ray image intensifier (SSXII): an EMCCD-based x-ray detector , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Kenkichi Tanioka,et al.  An indirect flat-panel detector with avalanche gain for low dose x-ray imaging: SAPHIRE (scintillator avalanche photoconductor with high resolution emitter readout) , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  Carlo Tognina,et al.  Photodiode forward bias to reduce temporal effects in a-Si based flat panel detectors , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  B. Hadwen,et al.  The noise performance of electron multiplying charge-coupled devices , 2003 .

[23]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  An empirical method for lag correction in cone-beam CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[24]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Implementation of a high-sensitivity micro-angiographic fluoroscope (HS-MAF) for in-vivo endovascular image guided interventions (EIGI) and region-of-interest computed tomography (ROI-CT) , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.