Weight Management Apps in Saudi Arabia: Evaluation of Features and Quality

Background Weight management apps may provide support and management options for individuals with overweight and obesity. Research on the quality of weight management mHealth apps among the Saudi population is insufficient despite frequent use. Objective The aims of this study were to explore user perceptions of weight management apps, explore reasons for starting and stopping app use, appraise the quality of weight management apps available in the App Store, and compare the features currently available within the app market and those that are most desirable to weight management app users. Methods A web-based survey consisted of 31 open and closed questions about sociodemographic information, general health questions, app use, app user perceptions, and discontinuation of app use. The quality of the weight management apps available on the App Store was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale and evidence-based strategies. We also used six sigma evaluations to ensure that the quality measured by the tools consistently meets customer expectations. Results Data from the survey were analyzed. Of the respondents, 30.17% (324/1074) had used a weight management app, 18.16% (195/1074) used the apps and stopped, and 51.68% (555/1074) had never used a weight management app. Of apps mentioned, 23 met the inclusion criteria. The overall average Mobile App Rating Scale quality of apps was acceptable; 30% (7/23) received a quality mean score of 4 or higher (out of 5), and 30% (7/23) did not meet the acceptability score of 3 or higher. Evidence-based strategy results showed that feedback was not observed in any of the apps, and motivation strategy was observed in only 1 app. The sigma results of evidence-based strategies reflect that most of the apps fail to pass the mean. Conclusions App users desired a feature that allows them to communicate with a specialist, which is a missing in the available free apps. Despite the large number and accessibility of weight management apps, the quality and features of most are variable. It can be concluded from six sigma results that passing the mean does not ensure that the quality is consistently distributed through all app quality properties and Mobile App Rating Scale and evidence-based strategies do not give developers an indication of the acceptance of their apps by mobile users. This finding stresses the importance of reevaluating the passing criterion, which is ≥50% for designing an effective app.

[1]  Ghada Al-Hudhud,et al.  Quality Evaluation of Mobile Game: Miftah Alfasaha , 2016, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Melissa Stec,et al.  Client-Centered Mobile Health Care Applications: Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale Instrument for Evidence-Based Evaluation. , 2019, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[3]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  R. Fagerli,et al.  Gender Differences in Opinions and Practices with Regard to a "Healthy Diet"> , 1999, Appetite.

[5]  P. Krebs,et al.  Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[6]  Jordan Rivera,et al.  Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[7]  Stephan U Dombrowski,et al.  Using Smartphones and Health Apps to Change and Manage Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Survey , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Matthew Bambling,et al.  Mindful Eating Mobile Health Apps: Review and Appraisal , 2019, JMIR mental health.

[9]  Calvin Or,et al.  Prevalence, Demographic Correlates, and Perceived Impacts of Mobile Health App Use Amongst Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey Study , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[10]  K. Weinfurt,et al.  An Evaluation of Mobile Health Application Tools , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[11]  Alejandro Salazar,et al.  Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[12]  Ghadeer S Aljuraiban,et al.  Use of Weight-Management Mobile Phone Apps in Saudi Arabia: A Web-Based Survey , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[13]  Ali H. Mokdad,et al.  Obesity and Associated Factors — Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013 , 2014, Preventing chronic disease.

[14]  C. K. Nikolaou,et al.  Mobile applications for obesity and weight management: current market characteristics , 2017, International Journal of Obesity.

[15]  J. Wardle,et al.  Gender differences in food choice: The contribution of health beliefs and dieting , 2004, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[16]  Andrew Lepp,et al.  The relationship between cell phone use, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in adults aged 18-80 , 2019, Computers in Human Behavior.

[17]  P. Katzmarzyk,et al.  Physical activity for obese individuals: a systematic review of effects on chronic disease risk factors , 2012, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[18]  Jianhui Yang,et al.  Software Quality Evaluation Model Based on Weighted Mutation Rate Correction Incompletion G1 Combination Weights , 2014 .

[19]  G. Flores Mateo,et al.  Mobile Phone Apps to Promote Weight Loss and Increase Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  Oksana Zelenko,et al.  Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[21]  Charles Abraham,et al.  A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[22]  Arjuna Sathiaseelan,et al.  Do Arabic weight-loss apps adhere to evidence-informed practices? , 2016, Translational behavioral medicine.

[23]  Gretchen A. Stevens,et al.  Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults , 2017, Lancet.