The 3-ounce (90-cc) water swallow challenge: A screening test for children with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia

Objectives: To investigate the clinical utility of the 3-ounce (90-cc) water swallow challenge alone to determine both aspiration status and oral feeding recommendations in children. Design: Cross-sectional evaluation of a diagnostic test with a consecutive, referral-based sample. Setting: Urban, tertiary care, teaching hospital. Participants: Fifty-six children (age range 2–18 years; mean 13 years) referred for swallowing evaluations. Outcome Measures: Aspiration status during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was the objective criterion standard with which results from the 3-ounce water swallow challenge were compared. Results: Twenty-two (39.3%) participants passed and 34 (60.7%) failed the 3-ounce challenge. Sensitivity for predicting aspiration status during FEES = 100.0 percent, specificity = 51.2 percent, and false-positive rate = 48.4 percent. Sensitivity for identifying individuals who were deemed safe for oral intake based on FEES results = 100.0 percent, specificity = 44.0 percent, and false-positive rate = 56.0 percent. Conclusions: If the 3-ounce water swallow challenge is passed, not only thin liquids but diet recommendations with puree and solid food consistencies can be made without the need for further instrumental dysphagia assessment. Significance: The 3-ounce water swallow challenge has been shown to be a clinically useful screening test for oropharyngeal dysphagia in children.

[1]  S. Langmore,et al.  Predictors of Aspiration Pneumonia: How Important Is Dysphagia? , 1998, Dysphagia.

[2]  Susan E. Langmore,et al.  Endoscopic and Videofluoroscopic Evaluations of Swallowing and Aspiration , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  Paula Leslie,et al.  Assessing Penetration and Aspiration: How Do Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Compare? , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  S. Leder,et al.  Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in the Pediatric Population , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[5]  A. Kelly,et al.  Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? 1 , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[6]  C. Sasaki,et al.  A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  S. Leder,et al.  Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. , 2008, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[8]  Susan E. Langmore,et al.  Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure , 2006, Dysphagia.

[9]  B. J. Martin,et al.  The association of swallowing dysfunction and aspiration pneumonia , 2004, Dysphagia.

[10]  Westgate Road,et al.  Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? , 2007 .

[11]  J. Rosenbek,et al.  Effects of verbal cue on bolus flow during swallowing. , 2007, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[12]  S. Leder,et al.  Aspiration Risk After Acute Stroke: Comparison of Clinical Examination and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing , 2002, Dysphagia.

[13]  Clarence T. Sasaki,et al.  Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Dysphagia to Identify Silent Aspiration , 1998, Dysphagia.

[14]  M. Reding,et al.  Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[15]  J. Logemann,et al.  Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders , 1983 .

[16]  Steven B. Leder,et al.  Clinical Utility of the 3-ounce Water Swallow Test , 2008, Dysphagia.

[17]  C. Hartnick,et al.  Pediatric Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.