High Performance Model Predictive Control for PMSM by Using Stator Current Mathematical Model Self-Regulation Technique

Excellent control performance and high robustness under different operating conditions are primary purposes pursued by many model predictive control algorithms. As a model-based control algorithm, the accuracy of the stator current mathematical model has a significant impact on the control performance of the predictive current control (PCC) method. To improve the current tracking accuracy and the robustness against parameter variation, a stator current mathematical model self-regulation strategy, which uses stator current prediction error to calculate parameter changes and design a parameter variation compensation strategy to correct the mathematical model in real-time at each control cycle, based on PCC algorithm is proposed to pursue desired performance. Consequently, the elimination of stator current prediction error, high controlled quality, and better robustness have been achieved in the proposed method. The comparative simulation and experiment results validate the superiority of the proposed method.

[1]  Ralph Kennel,et al.  A Fixed Switching Frequency Scheme for Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Control—Concept and Algorithm , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Shihua Li,et al.  Generalized Proportional Integral Observer Based Robust Finite Control Set Predictive Current Control for Induction Motor Systems With Time-Varying Disturbances , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  Wei Xu,et al.  Improved Deadbeat Predictive Current Control Combined Sliding Mode Strategy for PMSM Drive System , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Yongchang Zhang,et al.  Performance evaluation of two-vector-based model predictive current control of PMSM drives , 2018, Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering.

[5]  Dianguo Xu,et al.  Robust Predictive Current Control With Online Disturbance Estimation for Induction Machine Drives , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[6]  Mateja Novak,et al.  Weighting Factor Design in Model Predictive Control of Power Electronic Converters: An Artificial Neural Network Approach , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  Changliang Xia,et al.  Smooth Speed Control for Low-Speed High-Torque Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Using Proportional–Integral–Resonant Controller , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[8]  Wensheng Song,et al.  A Constant Switching Frequency Finite-Control-Set Predictive Current Control Scheme of a Five-Phase Inverter With Duty-Ratio Optimization , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  Jie Liu,et al.  Robust Deadbeat Predictive Power Control With a Discrete-Time Disturbance Observer for PWM Rectifiers Under Unbalanced Grid Conditions , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[10]  Dianguo Xu,et al.  Static-Errorless Deadbeat Predictive Current Control Using Second-Order Sliding-Mode Disturbance Observer for Induction Machine Drives , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  Jun-Cheol Park,et al.  Predictive Current Control Methods With Reduced Current Errors and Ripples for Single-Phase Voltage Source Inverters , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[12]  Lei Guo,et al.  Disturbance/Uncertainty Estimation and Attenuation Techniques in PMSM Drives—A Survey , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Ralph Kennel,et al.  Robust Predictive Control for Direct-Driven Surface-Mounted Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Generators Without Mechanical Sensors , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[14]  Davood Arab Khaburi,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Predictive Current Control and Predictive Torque Control for a PMSM Fed by a Matrix Converter , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Yasser Abdel-Rady Ibrahim Mohamed,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Robust Current-Control Scheme for a PMSM Vector Drive With a Simple Adaptive Disturbance Observer , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Davood Arab Khaburi,et al.  Robustness Improvement of Predictive Current Control Using Prediction Error Correction for Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machines , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Yongchang Zhang,et al.  Model Predictive Current Control for PMSM Drives With Parameter Robustness Improvement , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[18]  Paul D. Walker,et al.  Deadbeat control based on a multipurpose disturbance observer for permanent magnet synchronous motors , 2018 .

[19]  Ralph Kennel,et al.  A Variable Switching Point Predictive Current Control Strategy for Quasi-Z-Source Inverters , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[20]  Tobias Geyer,et al.  On the Choice of Norm in Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[21]  S. Alireza Davari Predictive Direct Angle Control of Induction Motor , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  Roberto Morales-Caporal,et al.  A Comparison on Finite-Set Model Predictive Torque Control Schemes for PMSMs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[23]  Daniel E. Quevedo,et al.  Performance of Multistep Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control for Power Electronics , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[24]  Wei Xing Zheng,et al.  Design of a Prediction-Accuracy-Enhanced Continuous-Time MPC for Disturbed Systems via a Disturbance Observer , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  Ralph Kennel,et al.  Optimal Control Solutions for PMSM Drives: A Comparison Study With Experimental Assessments , 2018, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics.