Using network analyses within geographic information system technologies to quantify geometries of shear zone networks

Shear zones often exhibit anastomosing network geometries. Previous work has shown that the detailed geometries of shear zone networks may partially control strain localization, fluid flow, rheology, and deformation mechanisms. However, there are currently no reliable tools to quantify network geometries such as the distribution of individual small shear zones and the connectedness of the network. Geographic information systems (GIS) provide a potential method for quantifying network geometries. GIS-based networking analyses have been used to quantify many different types of other networks, and here they are applied to shear zones. Many parameters within GIS-based networking analyses are useful for quantifying shear zone network geometries, including the connectivity parameters gamma and alpha, sinuosity, and vertex distribution patterns. Sets of these parameters are useful to quantitatively distinguish geometrical patterns of shear zone networks over a variety of conditions. Further quantification of shear zone network geometries may allow us to link those geometries to shear zone mechanisms, strain accumulation, and rheology.

[1]  P. Bauer,et al.  'See-through' deformation experiments on brittle-viscous norcamphor at controlled temperature, strain rate and applied confining pressure , 2000 .

[2]  E. Carranza,et al.  Spatial Association of Mineral Occurrences and Curvilinear Geological Features , 2002 .

[3]  S. Misra,et al.  Role of weak flaws in nucleation of shear zones: an experimental and theoretical study , 2004 .

[4]  Mauro Alberti,et al.  Application of GIS to spatial analysis of mesofault populations , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[5]  P. Choukroune,et al.  Strain pattern in the Aar Granite (Central Alps): orthogneiss developed by bulk inhomogeneous flattening , 1983 .

[6]  P. Fleeman GIS based modeling of electricity networks , 1997 .

[7]  P. Hudleston,et al.  Strain in ductile shear zones in the Caledonides of northern Sweden: a three-dimensional puzzle , 2001 .

[8]  G. Zeilinger,et al.  Shear strain localization from the upper mantle to the middle crust of the Kohistan Arc (Pakistan) , 2005, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[9]  M. Jessell,et al.  Micro-shear zones in experimentally deformed octachloropropane , 1999 .

[10]  J. Carreras Zooming on Northern Cap de Creus shear zones , 2001 .

[11]  J. Selverstone,et al.  Fluid channelling during ductile shearing: transformation of granodiorite into aluminous schist in the Tauern Window, Eastern Alps , 1991 .

[12]  L. Ricou,et al.  Syn-metamorphic nappe complex in the Rhodope Massif. Structure and kinematics , 1996 .

[13]  C. Holyoke,et al.  Mechanisms of weak phase interconnection and the effects of phase strength contrast on fabric development , 2006 .

[14]  J. Burg,et al.  Pre-collisional anastomosing shear zones in the Kohistan arc, NW Pakistan , 2000, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[15]  P. Burrough GIS and geostatistics: Essential partners for spatial analysis , 2001, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[16]  J. Burg,et al.  Complex flow in lowest crustal, anastomosing mylonites: Strain gradients in a Kohistan gabbro, northern Pakistan , 2003 .

[17]  P. Cobbold,et al.  Bulk kinematics from shear zone patterns: some field examples , 1987 .

[18]  G. V. Loganathan,et al.  GIS-Based Approach to Sewer System Design , 1999 .

[19]  Sa Sinske,et al.  Sewer-system analysis with the aid of a geographical information system , 2002 .

[20]  David I. Groves,et al.  Developing the tools for geological shape analysis, with regional‐ to local‐scale examples from the Kalgoorlie Terrane of Western Australia , 2000 .

[21]  Dyanna M. Czeck,et al.  Physical experiments of vertical transpression with localized nonvertical extrusion , 2004 .

[22]  F. Fusseis,et al.  Networking of shear zones at the brittle-to-viscous transition (Cap de Creus, NE Spain) , 2006 .

[23]  D. D. Vleeschouwer,et al.  Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs , 2010 .

[24]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  GIS and Network Analysis , 2004 .

[25]  M. Alberti Spatial structures in earthquakes and faults: quantifying similarity in simulated stress fields and natural data sets , 2006 .

[26]  J. Streit,et al.  Fluid infiltration and volume change during mid‐crustal mylonitization of Proterozoic granite, King Island, Tasmania , 1998 .

[27]  J. Burg Ductile structures and instabilities: their implication for Variscan tectonics in the Ardennes , 1999 .

[28]  H. Miller Potential Contributions of Spatial Analysis to Geographic Information Systems for Transportation (GIS-T) , 2010 .

[29]  P. Hudleston Strain compatibility and shear zones: Is there a problem? , 1999 .

[30]  J. Tullis,et al.  Hydrolytic weakening of experimentally deformed Westerly granite and Hale albite rock , 1980 .

[31]  J. Streit,et al.  Evolution of fracture networks in shear zones: Insights from see-through experiments on biphenyl aggregates , 2002 .

[32]  T. H. Bell,et al.  Foliation development — The contribution, geometry and significance of progressive, bulk, inhomogeneous shortening , 1981 .