An Integrated Approach for Shape Optimization with Mesh-Morphing

Although the CAD parameters allow to update easily the geometrical model, the numerical models updating into Finite Elements (FE) software with different mesh result to be often heavy, due to the necessity both to create new mesh and to make usually time consuming and complex CAE calculations for updating the loading conditions. The aim of the present research is to devise a reliable methodology and at the same time to reduce computational burden in the shape optimization studies of mechanical components. In particular, an integrated Multibody (MB) and Mesh-Morphing (MM) approach was developed to perform shape optimization, in order to reduce maximum tensions. Using the RBF Morph ACT Extension plugin implemented in the commercial solver FEM ANSYS® Mechanical vers. 18.2 along with the commercial MB software MSC ADAMS® vers. 2017, shape optimizations can be obtained in a very short time, by acting directly at the mesh so updating node positions and mesh elements geometry without bringing different geometrical models of the component into the FE environment. To validate the methodology, a crankshaft for a high performance Internal Combustion Engine (I.C.E.) was chosen, as case study, to optimize the fillet zones between web and pin.

[1]  Nilanjan Mukherjee,et al.  A Mesh Morphing Technique For Geometrically Dissimilar Tessellated Surfaces , 2007, IMR.

[2]  James Marco,et al.  Powertrain modelling for engine stop–start dynamics and control of micro/mild hybrid construction machines , 2017 .

[3]  Tomasz Trzepieciński,et al.  Stress and failure analysis of the crankshaft of diesel engine , 2017 .

[4]  Ian A Sigal,et al.  Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  B. Vijaya Ramnath,et al.  Implementation of Reverse Engineering for Crankshaft Manufacturing Industry , 2018 .

[6]  Matthew L. Staten,et al.  A Comparison of Mesh Morphing Methods for 3D Shape Optimization , 2011, IMR.

[7]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Mesh Moving Techniques for Fluid-Structure Interactions With Large Displacements , 2003 .

[8]  G. Sequenzia,et al.  An effective model for the sliding contact forces in a multibody environment , 2017 .

[9]  Shuangchao Hou,et al.  Virtual prototyping-based fatigue analysis and simulation of crankshaft , 2017 .

[10]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions , 2021, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[11]  Zhen Li,et al.  Systematical Analysis Method for the Mechanical Behaviors of Crankshaft-Bearing System , 2017 .

[12]  Suzanne M. Shontz,et al.  Analysis of and workarounds for element reversal for a finite element-based algorithm for warping triangular and tetrahedral meshes , 2004, cs/0410045.

[13]  Marco Evangelos Biancolini Ridurre le concentrazioni di tensione con il mesh morphing , 2017 .

[14]  Zissimos P. Mourelatos,et al.  A crankshaft system model for structural dynamic analysis of internal combustion engines , 2001 .

[15]  Shulin Duan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Vibration of the Crankshaft of a Large Marine Diesel Engine Under a Mixed Thermo-Elastic-Hydro-Dynamic Lubrication Coupling Between Flexible Crankshaft and Engine Block , 2018 .

[16]  G. Sequenzia,et al.  Flexible Multibody Model of Desmodromic Timing System , 2009 .

[17]  Matteo De Cesare,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Engine Performance Investigation Through Double Crankshaft Speed Measurement , 2015 .

[18]  Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,et al.  First principle based control oriented model of a gasoline engine including multi-cylinder dynamics , 2018 .