Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord—restoring motor function

Regaining motor function is of high priority to patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). A variety of electronic devices that interface with the brain or spinal cord, which have applications in neural prosthetics and neurorehabilitation, are in development. Owing to our advancing understanding of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, new technologies to monitor, decode and manipulate neural activity are being translated to patient populations, and have demonstrated clinical efficacy. Brain–machine interfaces that decode motor intentions from cortical signals are enabling patient-driven control of assistive devices such as computers and robotic prostheses, whereas electrical stimulation of the spinal cord and muscles can aid in retraining of motor circuits and improve residual capabilities in patients with SCI. Next-generation interfaces that combine recording and stimulating capabilities in so-called closed-loop devices will further extend the potential for neuroelectronic augmentation of injured motor circuits. Emerging evidence suggests that integration of closed-loop interfaces into intentional motor behaviours has therapeutic benefits that outlast the use of these devices as prostheses. In this Review, we summarize this evidence and propose that several known plasticity mechanisms, operating in a complementary manner, might underlie the therapeutic effects that are achieved by closing the loop between electronic devices and the nervous system.

[1]  Benchara Branford,et al.  Reviews , 1920 .

[2]  J. Knott The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory , 1951 .

[3]  E. Fetz Operant Conditioning of Cortical Unit Activity , 1969, Science.

[4]  D R Humphrey,et al.  Predicting Measures of Motor Performance from Multiple Cortical Spike Trains , 1970, Science.

[5]  M. Craggs Cortical control of motor prostheses: using the cord-transected baboon as the primate model for human paraplegia. , 1975, Advances in neurology.

[6]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[7]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[8]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[9]  A. Keller,et al.  Long-lasting facilitation of pyramidal tract input to spinal interneurons. , 1990, Neuroreport.

[10]  M. Stewart,et al.  A Biological Perspective , 1990 .

[11]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[13]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Evidence of subclinical brain influence in clinically complete spinal cord injury: discomplete SCI , 1992, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[14]  M. Randić,et al.  Long-term potentiation and long-term depression of primary afferent neurotransmission in the rat spinal cord , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  F. A. Mussa-lvaldi,et al.  Convergent force fields organized in the frog's spinal cord , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  G. Brindley,et al.  The first 500 patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants: general description , 1994, Paraplegia.

[17]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Dimitrijevic,et al.  Evidence for a Spinal Central Pattern Generator in Humans a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Responses to spinal microstimulation in the chronically spinalized rat and their relationship to spinal systems activated by low threshold cutaneous stimulation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[21]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Spinal Cord Microstimulation Generates Functional Limb Movements in Chronically Implanted Cats , 2000, Experimental Neurology.

[22]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates , 2000, Nature.

[23]  V. Mushahwar,et al.  Selective activation of muscle groups in the feline hindlimb through electrical microstimulation of the ventral lumbo-sacral spinal cord. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  T. Perkins,et al.  FES cycling may promote recovery of leg function after incomplete spinal cord injury , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[25]  M. Keith Neuroprostheses for the upper extremity , 2001, Microsurgery.

[26]  S. Hochman,et al.  Modulatory actions of serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine, and acetylcholine in spinal cord deep dorsal horn neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[28]  D. Durand,et al.  Functionally selective peripheral nerve stimulation with a flat interface nerve electrode , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  S. Meagher Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[30]  D. Graupe An overview of the state of the art of noninvasive FES for independent ambulation by thoracic level paraplegics , 2002, Neurological research.

[31]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[32]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  ‘Thought’ – control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of Functional Electrical Therapy in acute hemiplegic subjects. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  Mirjana B Popović,et al.  Control of neural prostheses for grasping and reaching. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[35]  N J Davey,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation can improve clinical outcome in incomplete spinal cord injured patients , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[36]  Thomas Sinkjaer,et al.  Motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve depends on the voluntary drive , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[39]  K. Anderson Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[40]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: A step towards clinical practice , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[41]  C. Mehring,et al.  Encoding of Movement Direction in Different Frequency Ranges of Motor Cortical Local Field Potentials , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic signals predict movement trajectory in space , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  A. Hicks,et al.  Long-term body-weight-supported treadmill training and subsequent follow-up in persons with chronic SCI: effects on functional walking ability and measures of subjective well-being , 2005, Spinal Cord.

[44]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  S. Rossignol Plasticity of connections underlying locomotor recovery after central and/or peripheral lesions in the adult mammals , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  V. Mushahwar,et al.  Locomotor-Related Networks in the Lumbosacral Enlargement of the Adult Spinal Cat: Activation Through Intraspinal Microstimulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[47]  J. Wyndaele,et al.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[48]  E. Fetz,et al.  The neurochip BCI: towards a neural prosthesis for upper limb function , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[49]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Nonlocomotor and locomotor hindlimb responses evoked by electrical microstimulation of the lumbar cord in spinalized cats. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[51]  E. Fetz,et al.  Long-term motor cortex plasticity induced by an electronic neural implant , 2006, Nature.

[52]  Stephen B. McMahon,et al.  Spinal cord repair strategies: why do they work? , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  E. Fetz,et al.  Forelimb movements and muscle responses evoked by microstimulation of cervical spinal cord in sedated monkeys. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  R Rupp,et al.  Neuroprosthetics of the upper extremity--clinical application in spinal cord injury and challenges for the future. , 2007, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[56]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[57]  Shamim Nemati,et al.  Biomimetic Brain Machine Interfaces for the Control of Movement , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[59]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[60]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[61]  Sarah A. Dunlop,et al.  Activity-dependent plasticity: implications for recovery after spinal cord injury , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[62]  E. Fetz,et al.  Direct control of paralyzed muscles by cortical neurons , 2008, Nature.

[63]  C. Braun,et al.  Hand Movement Direction Decoded from MEG and EEG , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[65]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Advanced Neurotechnologies for Chronic Neural Interfaces: New Horizons and Clinical Opportunities , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  T. A. Thrasher,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation of walking: function, exercise and rehabilitation. , 2008, Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique.

[67]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain motor system function in a patient with complete spinal cord injury following extensive brain–computer interface training , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  Paul M Meadows,et al.  Implant technology and usability. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[69]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[70]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[71]  C. Braun,et al.  A review on directional information in neural signals for brain-machine interfaces , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[72]  Mark E. Dohring,et al.  Feasibility of a New Application of Noninvasive Brain Computer Interface (BCI): A Case Study of Training for Recovery of Volitional Motor Control After Stroke , 2009, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[73]  Janet L. Taylor,et al.  Voluntary Motor Output Is Altered by Spike-Timing-Dependent Changes in the Human Corticospinal Pathway , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  S. Solla,et al.  Toward the Restoration of Hand Use to a Paralyzed Monkey: Brain-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation of Forearm Muscles , 2009, PloS one.

[75]  F. Wörgötter,et al.  Activity-dependent structural plasticity , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.

[76]  M. Lemay,et al.  Hindlimb Endpoint Forces Predict Movement Direction Evoked by Intraspinal Microstimulation in Cats , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[77]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Motor Improvement and Corticospinal Modulation Induced by Hybrid Assistive Neuromuscular Dynamic Stimulation (HANDS) Therapy in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[78]  Igor A. Lavrov,et al.  Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[79]  L. Vinay,et al.  Strategies to restore motor functions after spinal cord injury , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[80]  W. A. Sarnacki,et al.  Electroencephalographic (EEG) control of three-dimensional movement , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[81]  J. Wolpaw What Can the Spinal Cord Teach Us about Learning and Memory? , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[82]  John H. Martin,et al.  Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Intact Corticospinal System after Unilateral Injury Restores Skilled Locomotor Control and Promotes Spinal Axon Outgrowth , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[83]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  Does Functional Electrical Stimulation for Foot Drop Strengthen Corticospinal Connections? , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[84]  Monica A. Perez,et al.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity. , 2010, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[85]  Lee E. Miller,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[86]  Naotaka Fujii,et al.  Long-Term Asynchronous Decoding of Arm Motion Using Electrocorticographic Signals in Monkeys , 2009, Front. Neuroeng..

[87]  J. Kessler,et al.  Stem cell therapies for spinal cord injury , 2010, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[88]  Daniel Moran,et al.  Evolution of brain–computer interface: action potentials, local field potentials and electrocorticograms , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[89]  Nicholas G Hatsopoulos,et al.  Incorporating Feedback from Multiple Sensory Modalities Enhances Brain–Machine Interface Control , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[90]  Majid Sarrafzadeh,et al.  Forelimb EMG-based trigger to control an electronic spinal bridge to enable hindlimb stepping after a complete spinal cord lesion in rats , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[91]  S. Hayek,et al.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Review , 2012, Current Pain and Headache Reports.

[92]  Christie K. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study , 2011, The Lancet.

[93]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Spinal associative stimulation: A non-invasive stimulation paradigm to modulate spinal excitability , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[94]  J D Simeral,et al.  Continuous neuronal ensemble control of simulated arm reaching by a human with tetraplegia , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[95]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  An SSVEP BCI to Control a Hand Orthosis for Persons With Tetraplegia , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[96]  Jens Schouenborg,et al.  Biocompatible multichannel electrodes for long-term neurophysiological studies and clinical therapy--novel concepts and design. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[97]  E. E. Fetz,et al.  Interfacing With the Computational Brain , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[98]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Learning to Move Machines with the Mind , 2022 .

[99]  Dragan F. Dimitrov,et al.  Reversible large-scale modification of cortical networks during neuroprosthetic control , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[100]  Peter J. Ifft,et al.  Active tactile exploration enabled by a brain-machine-brain interface , 2011, Nature.

[101]  Anne Vanhoestenberghe,et al.  Realization of an active book for multichannel intrathecal root stimulation in spinal cord injury — Preliminary results , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[102]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury: some facts and mechanisms. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[103]  J. Carmena,et al.  Active Sensing of Target Location Encoded by Cortical Microstimulation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[104]  Vivian K Mushahwar,et al.  Intraspinal microstimulation for the recovery of function following spinal cord injury. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[105]  Jonas B. Zimmermann,et al.  Reanimating the arm and hand with intraspinal microstimulation , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[106]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[107]  Robert Riener,et al.  Versatile robotic interface to evaluate, enable and train locomotion and balance after neuromotor disorders , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[108]  M. Devivo,et al.  Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: trends and future implications , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[109]  L. Epstein,et al.  Managing chronic pain with spinal cord stimulation. , 2012, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[110]  P. Caroni,et al.  Structural plasticity upon learning: regulation and functions , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[111]  Winfried Mayr,et al.  Neuromodulation of lower limb motor control in restorative neurology , 2012, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[112]  C Grozea,et al.  On the feasibility of using motor imagery EEG-based brain–computer interface in chronic tetraplegics for assistive robotic arm control: a clinical test and long-term post-trial follow-up , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[113]  L. Miller,et al.  Restoration of grasp following paralysis through brain-controlled stimulation of muscles , 2012, Nature.

[114]  S. Micera,et al.  Restoring Voluntary Control of Locomotion after Paralyzing Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, Science.

[115]  S. Beck,et al.  Pathway‐specific plasticity in the human spinal cord , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[116]  G A Clark,et al.  Coordinated, multi-joint, fatigue-resistant feline stance produced with intrafascicular hind limb nerve stimulation , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[117]  D. Gombos,et al.  Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology , 2013 .

[118]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Resting State Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate With Movement Recovery for BCI and Robot-Assisted Upper-Extremity Training After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[119]  V. Matejčík,et al.  GENERAL DESCRIPTION , 2018, Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus, an Unusual Theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Montana.