Male and female spatial behaviour of Roe deer in a mountainous habitat during pre-rutting and rutting period

During pre-rutting and rutting period, spacing behaviour of male and female roe deer Capreolus capreolus (Linnaeus, 1758) was studied in a wooded and mountainous habitat, in the Casentinesi Forest National Park, Italy. Data were collected using radio-tracking techniques from March to August 1997. Bimonthly and monthly home ranges and bimonthly home range overlaps of both sexes were analysed. Variations in bimonthly home range sizes did not show significant differences between sexes during pre-rutting and rutting period. Different social factors seemed to influence the ranging behaviour of both sexes in this mountainous habitat. Male use of space varied in relation to the age classes of animals, especially during the pre-rutting period, when yearlings were not able to establish a territory. Female ranging movements were linked to the births timing and to two different spacing strategies during the rutting period. Home ranges sizes of females were significantly lower than those of males in May and in July. Significant changes in home range sizes were also found between prime age males and both roaming and stationary females.

[1]  Robert E. Kenward,et al.  RANGES V: an analysis system for biological location data , 1996 .

[2]  A. Johansson,et al.  Territory establishment and antler cycle in male roe deer , 2010 .

[3]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[4]  J. Angibault,et al.  The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid production, home range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) , 1995 .

[5]  R. Andersen,et al.  The European roe deer: the biology of success. , 2000 .

[6]  W. V. Winkle COMPARISON OF SEVERAL PROBABILISTIC HOME-RANGE MODELS' , 1975 .

[7]  O. Liberg,et al.  Functional Aspects of Marking Behavior by Male Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) , 1996 .

[8]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Tests of estimation of age from tooth wear on roe deer of known age: variation within and among populations , 1999 .

[9]  N. Chapman,et al.  Sympatric populations of muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a comparative analysis of their ranging behaviour, social organization and activity , 1993 .

[10]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Behavioural Ecology of Siberian and European Roe Deer , 1995 .

[11]  R. Gill,et al.  Behavioral Ecology of Siberian and European Roe Deer , 1996 .

[12]  A. Mysterud Seasonal migration pattern and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in an altitudinal gradient in southern Norway , 1999 .

[13]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  B. Fruziński,et al.  Habitat, density and spatial structure of the forest roe deer population , 1983 .

[15]  J. Tester,et al.  Evaluation of Radio-Tracking by Triangulation with Special Reference to Deer Movements , 1967 .

[16]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid : the roe deer , 1996 .

[17]  Stephen Harris,et al.  Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals , 1990 .

[18]  M. Apollonio,et al.  Alternative use of space strategies of female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a mountainous habitat , 2001 .

[19]  C. S. José,et al.  Ranging Movements of Female Roe Deer: Do Home‐loving Does Roam to Mate? , 2010 .