Doing it for themselves? P erformance appraisal in project‐based organisations, the role of employees, and challenges to theory

We explore performance appraisal in project‐based organisations and provide novel insights into appraisal processes in this context. These include the central role of employees in orchestrating the appraisal process, the multiple actors that have input to appraisal including project managers, the distance between employees and their official line managers, and the weak coordinating role of human resource specialists in these systems. We draw attention to the drawbacks of current theorising on appraisal to predict and explain outcomes from appraisal systems that are not premised on stable line manager/employee dyads. Theorising based primarily on social exchange theories needs to be reconsidered in this context and new theories developed. We also question how human resource specialists can better support employees, and managers of all kinds, in their implementation roles in polyadic human resource management systems to ensure transparency, equity, and fairness of appraisal processes in a project‐based organisational context.

[1]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Managing and Working in Project Society: Institutional Challenges of Temporary Organizations , 2015 .

[2]  K. Miller,et al.  The co-dependency concept: does it offer a solution for the spouses of alcoholics? , 1994, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[3]  Helgi Thor Ingason,et al.  Projectification in Western economies: A comparative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland , 2018 .

[4]  R. Lundin,et al.  Projectification in the public sector – the case of the European Union , 2015 .

[5]  Per Svejvig,et al.  Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world , 2015 .

[6]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[7]  Robert M Verburga,et al.  The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks , 2007 .

[8]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  A Role Set Analysis of Gender Differences in Performance, Affective Relationships, and Career Success of Industrial Middle Managers , 1984 .

[9]  Mauro Mancini,et al.  Towards a design for the project-based organization , 2017 .

[10]  M. Hobday.  The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[11]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. , 1994 .

[12]  P. Wright,et al.  Variability Within Organizations: Implications for Strategic Human Resource Management , 2007 .

[13]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[14]  Mick Marchington,et al.  Human resource management (HRM): Too busy looking up to see where it is going longer term? , 2015 .

[15]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  Performance management: A model and research agenda , 2004 .

[16]  C. Belfield,et al.  The Determinants of Performance Appraisal Systems: A Note (Do Brown and Heywood's Results for Australia Hold Up for Britain?) , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  David A. DeCenzo,et al.  Fundamentals of Human Resource Management , 1993 .

[18]  J. Meijerink,et al.  Value creation through HR shared services: towards a conceptual framework , 2012 .

[19]  P. Gill,et al.  Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups , 2008, BDJ.

[20]  Bård Kuvaas,et al.  Exploring alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development, perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes , 2010 .

[21]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  HRM in project‐intensive firms: Changes and challenges , 2006 .

[22]  Joana Geraldi,et al.  The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model , 2008 .

[23]  Lars Lindkvist,et al.  Governing Project-based Firms: Promoting Market-like Processes within Hierarchies , 2004 .

[24]  Douglas Hyatt,et al.  Consequences of the performance appraisal experience , 2010 .

[25]  Sue Hutchinson,et al.  Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence , 2007 .

[26]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The management of innovation in project-based firms , 2000 .

[27]  Peter Y. Chen,et al.  Using Social Exchange Theory to Distinguish Procedural from Interactional Justice , 2002 .

[28]  M. Konovsky.  Understanding Procedural Justice and Its Impact on Business Organizations , 2000 .

[29]  Ethan Bernstein,et al.  Beyond the Holacracy Hype , 2016 .

[30]  J. Heywood,et al.  Performance Appraisal Systems: Determinants and Change , 2005 .

[31]  Rene M. Bakker,et al.  Temporary Organizing: Promises, Processes, Problems , 2016 .

[32]  Katrina Pritchard,et al.  Credibility lost: attempting to reclaim an expert identity in an HR professional context , 2015 .

[33]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits , 1986 .

[34]  B. Kuvaas.  Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation , 2006 .

[35]  D. Rousseau.  Organizational behavior in the new organizational era. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  Temporary Inter‐organizational Projects , 2008 .

[37]  Martina Huemann,et al.  Project Management Competences in the Project-oriented Organisation , 2000 .

[38]  Arthur G. Butler,et al.  Project Management: A Study in Organizational Conflict , 1973 .

[39]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[40]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Matrix organization designs How to combine functional and project forms , 1971 .

[41]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Getting control of multi-project organizations: Combining contingent control mechanisms , 2010 .

[42]  Martina Huemann,et al.  Considering Human Resource Management when developing a project-oriented company: Case study of a telecommunication company , 2010 .

[43]  J. Söderlund,et al.  Moving in, moving on : liminality practices in project-based work , 2013 .

[44]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[45]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[46]  M. Arthur,et al.  Paradox in Project-Based Enterprise: The Case of Film Making , 1998 .

[47]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships , 2000 .

[48]  Martina Huemann,et al.  Beyond the line: exploring the HRM responsibilities of line managers, project managers and the HRM department in four project-oriented companies in the Netherlands, Austria, the UK and the USA , 2012 .

[49]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  The HR quadriad: a framework for the analysis of HRM in project-based organizations , 2011 .

[50]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  It's Only Temporary: Time Frame and the Dynamics of Creative Project Teams , 2013 .

[51]  Alberto Bayo-Moriones,et al.  Performance Measurement and Incentive Intensity , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[52]  R. Defillippi,et al.  Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial , 2004 .