Separating haptic guidance from task dynamics: A practical solution via cutaneous devices

There is much interest in using haptic feedback for training new skills or guiding human movement. However, the results of studies that have incorporated haptic guidance to train new skills are mixed, depending on task complexity and the method by which the haptic guidance is implemented. Subjects show dependency on the guidance forces and difficulty in discerning which aspects of the haptic feedback are related to the task dynamics and which are meant to convey task completion strategies. For these reasons, new methods to separate haptic cues for guidance from haptic feedback of task dynamics are needed. In this experiment, 30 subjects completed a trajectory following task using a wrist exoskeleton which also rendered task forces. To assist subjects, guidance cues were provided in one of three forms: (1) cutaneous forces from a wearable skin-stretch device on the ipsilateral forearm and (2) contralateral forearm, and (3) kinesthetic forces from a kinematically similar wrist exoskeleton operated by the contralateral arm. The efficacies of each guidance condition are compared by examining subject performance and learning rates. The results indicate that cutaneous guidance is nearly as effective as kinesthetic guidance, making it a practical and cost-effective alternative for spatially separated assistance.

[1]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  Shared Control in Haptic Systems for Performance Enhancement and Training , 2006 .

[2]  Stephen H Scott,et al.  Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Effects of Vibrotactile Feedback on Human Learning of Arm Motions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Peter Wolf,et al.  The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  A Fabric-Based Approach for Wearable Haptics , 2016 .

[6]  Peter Wolf,et al.  Real‐time rowing simulator with multimodal feedback , 2008 .

[7]  William R. Provancher,et al.  Planar Hand Motion Guidance Using Fingertip Skin-Stretch Feedback , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[8]  Evan Pezent Design, Characterization, and Validation of the OpenWrist Exoskeleton , 2017 .

[9]  Simona Casini,et al.  Design and realization of the CUFF - clenching upper-limb force feedback wearable device for distributed mechano-tactile stimulation of normal and tangential skin forces , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[10]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Co-location of force and action improves identification of force-displacement features , 2012, 2012 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS).

[11]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  Robert Riener,et al.  A tendon-based parallel robot applied to motor learning in sports , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[13]  Brian L. Davies,et al.  Active Constraints/Virtual Fixtures: A Survey , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[15]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Haptic Guidance Can Enhance Motor Learning of a Steering Task , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  G Wulf,et al.  Physical-guidance benefits in learning a complex motor skill. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Chad G. Rose,et al.  System Characterization of MAHI EXO-II: A Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation. , 2014, Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference.

[18]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  The Task-Dependent Efficacy of Shared-Control Haptic Guidance Paradigms , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[19]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Negative efficacy of fixed gain error reducing shared control for training in virtual environments , 2009, TAP.

[20]  Keehoon Kim,et al.  Haptic Feedback Enhances Grip Force Control of sEMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hands in Targeted Reinnervation Amputees , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  Koen J. F. Verhoeven,et al.  Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power , 2005 .

[22]  P. Wiseman The Virtual Teacher , 1998 .

[23]  M. Sile O'Modhrain,et al.  The Virtual Teacher , 1999 .

[24]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  Evaluation of Tactile Feedback Methods for Wrist Rotation Guidance , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[25]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Wearable Haptic Systems for the Fingertip and the Hand: Taxonomy, Review, and Perspectives , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[26]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[27]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Simultaneous bimanual dynamics are learned without interference , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.