Making the global information society good: A social justice perspective on the ethical dimensions of the global information society

Society is seen as a continuation of relationships which have been altered by the use of modern information and communication technologies (ICTs). Four interrelated characteristics of the global Information Society also are identified. After a brief overview of the main socioethical issues facing the global Information Society, the article discusses the application of social justice as a moral tool that has universal moral validity and which can be used to address these ethical challenges. It is illustrated that the scope of justice is no longer limited to domestic issues. Three core principles of justice are furthermore distinguished, and based on these three principles, seven categories of justice are introduced. It is illustrated how these categories of justice can be applied to address the main ethical challenges of the Information Society. At both World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) meetings held in Geneva (December 2003) and Tunis (November 2005), the debate on the ethical dimensions and challenges facing the global Information Society did not go un-noticed. Following the Geneva summit, two documents were published: the Declaration of Principles and the Plan of Action (WSIS, 2003). After the Tunis summit, two further documents were published: the Tunis Commitment (WSIS, 2005a) and the Tunis agenda for the Information Society (WSIS, 2005b). In the Declaration of Principles, Paragraphs 56–59 specifically deal with the ethical dimensions of the Information Society. The Declaration's statements include: • The global Information Society must uphold the fundamental values of human freedom. • Human rights should be respected. • There should be no abusive use of modern ICT [information and communication technology]. Part C10 of the Plan of Action furthermore states that " the Information Society should be subject to universally held values and promote the common good and to prevent abusive uses of ICTs " (Paragraph 25). It sets out a number of actions. I summarize the most important of these: • All stakeholders should increase awareness of the ethical dimensions of the Information Society. • All actors in the Information Society should promote the common good. • Stakeholders, including academia, are invited to continue research on the ethical dimensions of ICTs. In the Tunis Agenda for the Information Society, issued after the Tunis meeting of the WSIS, this commitment to the Geneva Declaration of Principles (Paragraphs 55–59) as well as to the Action Plan was confirmed (WSIS, 2005b). UNESCO is one of the lead facilitating agencies for …

[1]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[2]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[3]  M. Walzer.  Spheres of justice : a defense of pluralism and equality , 1985 .

[4]  Peter Johan Lor,et al.  Is a knowledge society possible without freedom of access to information? , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Culture, technology, communication : towards an intercultural global village , 2001 .

[6]  Edward J. O'Boyle,et al.  Comments on the Foundations of Economic Personalism Series , 2006 .

[7]  J. Britz,et al.  Indigenous Knowledge: A Moral Reflection on Current Legal Concepts of Intellectual Property , 2001 .

[8]  Cees J. Hamelink,et al.  The ethics of cyberspace , 2001 .

[9]  I. Kant,et al.  Grounding for the metaphysics of morals , 1981 .

[10]  P. Evans,et al.  Strategy and the new economics of information. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[11]  Arnold S. de Beer,et al.  The Internet in Africa - A New Road to Developmental Opportunities or a Digital Highway leading to Nowhere? , 2001 .

[12]  C. J. Hamelink.  Moral challenges in the information society , 2002 .

[13]  Peter Johan Lor,et al.  Knowledge production from an African perspective: International information flows and intellectual property ☆ , 2005 .

[14]  Doris E Long.  The Impact of Foreign Investment on Indigenous Culture: An Intellectual Property Perspective , 1998 .

[15]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[16]  Diana Rosenberg,et al.  African Journals Online: improving awareness and access , 2002, Learn. Publ..

[17]  J. Habermas.  Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[18]  Priscilla S. Markwood,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[19]  Peter Drahos,et al.  Thinking strategically about intellectual property rights , 1997 .

[20]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The Moral Imperatives of Global Capitalism: An Overview , 2003 .

[21]  James H. Moor,et al.  Towards a theory of privacy in the information age , 1997, CSOC.

[22]  J. Britz,et al.  Africa as a knowledge society: A reality check , 2006 .

[23]  L. Floridi.  © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Information ethics: On the philosophical foundation of computer ethics ⋆ , 2022 .

[24]  David Kaplan,et al.  Scientific Nomadism and the New Geopolitics of Knowledge , 2001 .

[25]  Dieter Schönecker,et al.  I M M A N U E L K A N T Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals , 2011 .

[26]  Inge Kaul,et al.  Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century , 1999 .

[27]  D. Carroll.  Economic Justice for All: Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy . By National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Washington, D.C.: United States Catholic Conference, 1986. Pp. 188. $2.95 paper. ISBN: 1-55586-101-6. , 1988 .

[28]  A. Sen,et al.  Capability and Well-Being , 1991 .

[29]  David Miller.  Principles of Social Justice , 2001 .

[30]  Johannes J. Britz,et al.  To Know or not to Know: A Moral Reflection on Information Poverty , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..