The influence of diel vertical migration on zooplankton transport and recruitment in an upwelling region: estimates from a coupled behavioral‐physical model

Diel vertical migration (DVM) is a common zooplankton behavior in which organisms reside in surface or near-surface waters at night and at deeper depths during the day. In many upwelling regions, DVM reduces the transport of organisms away from the region. It is unclear, however, what role DVM plays in recruitment (the arrival of larvae or juveniles to locations where they will become reproducing adults) to upwelling regions. In this study, we estimate the influence of DVM on zooplankton transport, the level of recruitment of locally produced propagules (self-recruitment), and sources of recruits in the upwelling region near Monterey Bay, California, by simulating the trajectories of fixed-depth and vertically migrating organisms with a drifter-tracking algorithm driven by climatological velocity fields from a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model. Our simulations suggest that DVM into subsurface poleward and onshore currents during the day does not fully compensate for equatorward and offshore transport in the surface Ekman layer at night and does not retain zooplankton in the Monterey Bay region. Our simulations also suggest that DVM decreases the ability of zooplankton to return to the region after being transported away and shifts source regions for recruits closer to the bay. While DVM does not appear to substantially increase the potential for self-recruitment to the region, this study indicates that other mechanisms, such as transport during non-upwelling periods, continuous transport below the surface, increases in mean transport depth over time, or seasonal changes in hydrography, may still enable relatively high levels of self-recruitment to this highly advective region.

[1]  N. Garfield,et al.  Mean structure of the inshore countercurrent and California undercurrent off Point Sur, California , 2000 .

[2]  F. Chavez,et al.  Changes in the hydrography of Central California waters associated with the 1997-98 El Nino , 2002 .

[3]  John P. Ryan,et al.  Biological and chemical consequences of the 1997–1998 El Niño in central California waters , 2002 .

[4]  C. Mooers,et al.  Genetic tracers of zooplankton transport in coastal filaments off northern California , 1989 .

[5]  G. Hays,et al.  Individual variability in diel vertical migration of a marine copepod: Why some individuals remain at depth when others migrate , 2001 .

[6]  Francisco P. Chavez,et al.  Seasonal fluctuations of temperature, salinity, nitrate, chlorophyll and primary production at station H3/M1 over 1989-1996 in Monterey Bay, California , 2000 .

[7]  B. Frost,et al.  Copepod diel migration, feeding, and the: vertical flux of pheopigments , 1989 .

[8]  L. Botsford.  Physical influences on recruitment to California Current invertebrate populations on multiple scales , 2001 .

[9]  L. Botsford,et al.  Diel vertical migration and timing of metamorphosis of larvae of the Dungeness crab Cancer magister , 1992 .

[10]  John C. Kindle,et al.  A COAMPS™ reanalysis for the Eastern Pacific: Properties of the diurnal sea breeze along the central California coast , 2002 .

[11]  M. Ohman,et al.  Differential dormancy of co-occurring copepods , 1998 .

[12]  J. Largier,et al.  Upwelling shadows as nearshore retention sites: the example of northern Monterey Bay , 1997 .

[13]  B. Frost.  Variability and possible adaptive significance of diel vertical migration in Calanus pacificus, a planktonic marine copepod , 1988 .

[14]  J. Wroblewski.  Interaction of currents and vertical migration in maintaining Calanus marshallae in the Oregon upwelling zone—a simulation , 1982 .

[15]  F. Chavez,et al.  The California Current system off Monterey, California: physical and biological coupling , 2003 .

[16]  Mark H. Carr,et al.  PROPAGULE DISPERSAL DISTANCE AND THE SIZE AND SPACING OF MARINE RESERVES , 2003 .

[17]  A. Shanks.  Vertical migration and cross-shelf dispersal of larval Cancer spp. and Randallia ornata (Crustacea: Brachyura) off the coast of southern California , 1986 .

[18]  F. Chavez,et al.  Effects of the 1997-1999 El Nino and La Nina events on zooplankton abundance and euphausiid community composition within the Monterey Bay coastal upwelling system , 2002 .

[19]  J. Haney.  Diel patterns of zooplankton behavior , 1988 .

[20]  W. Timothy Liu,et al.  NASA scatterometer provides global ocean‐surface wind fields with more structures than numerical weather prediction , 1998 .

[21]  M. Gibbs,et al.  Simulations of coastal upwelling on the Sydney Continental Shelf , 2000 .

[22]  Clinton D. Winant,et al.  The Marine Layer off Northern California: An Example of Supercritical Channel Flow , 1988 .

[23]  E. Brinton.  Population biology of Euphausia pacifica off southern California , 1976 .

[24]  A. Hastings,et al.  The influence of spatially and temporally varying oceanographic conditions on meroplanktonic metapopulations , 1994 .

[25]  W. Peterson.  Life cycle strategies of copepods in coastal upwelling zones , 1998 .

[26]  E. Brinton.  VERTICAL MIGRATION AND AVOIDANCE CAPABILITY OF EUPHAUSIIDS IN THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT , 1967, Limnology and oceanography.

[27]  J. McWilliams,et al.  Evaluation and application of the ROMS 1-way embedding procedure to the central california upwelling system , 2006 .

[28]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  A method for computing horizontal pressure‐gradient force in an oceanic model with a nonaligned vertical coordinate , 2003 .

[29]  Franklin B. Schwing,et al.  Bifurcated flow from an upwelling center: a cold water source for Monterey Bay , 1994 .

[30]  Hans C. Graber,et al.  Satellite scatterometer studies of ocean surface stress and drag coefficients using a direct model , 1999 .

[31]  David A. Siegel,et al.  Lagrangian descriptions of marine larval dispersion , 2003 .

[32]  G. Hays.  A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[33]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  Upwelling response to coastal wind profiles , 2004 .

[34]  R. Cowen,et al.  LOCAL RETENTION OF PRODUCTION IN MARINE POPULATIONS: EVIDENCE, MECHANISMS, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[35]  J. Pineda,et al.  Predicting self-recruitment in marine populations: biophysical correlates and mechanisms , 2002 .

[36]  P. Franks,et al.  Influence of variability in larval development on recruitment success in the euphausiid Euphausia pacifica : elasticity and sensitivity analyses , 1999 .

[37]  G. Eckert,et al.  DISPERSAL POTENTIAL OF MARINE INVERTEBRATES IN DIVERSE HABITATS , 2003 .

[38]  L. Richardson,et al.  Atmospheric Diffusion Shown on a Distance-Neighbour Graph , 1926 .

[39]  R. R. Strathmann,et al.  Evolution of local recruitment and its consequences for marine populations , 2002 .

[40]  Thomas M. Powell,et al.  Individual-based models of copepod populations in coastal upwelling regions: implications of physiologically and environmentally influenced diel vertical migration on demographic success and nearshore retention , 2002 .

[41]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  Equilibrium structure and dynamics of the California Current System , 2003 .

[42]  D. Parisi,et al.  Towards a robust concept for modelling zooplankton migration , 2001 .

[43]  Alexander F. Shchepetkin,et al.  The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model , 2005 .

[44]  L. Botsford,et al.  Inter-annual variability in larval supply to populations of three invertebrate taxa in the northern California Current , 2003 .

[45]  Daniel R. Lynch,et al.  Spatially-explicit individual based modeling of marine populations: A review of the advances in the 1990s , 2001 .