Individuals Among the Pots: How Do Traditional Ceramic Shapes Vary Between Potters?

ABSTRACT At the crossroad of archeology and experimental psychology, we addressed the issue of interindividual variability in traditional ceramic shapes. The goal was to explore whether such variability could imply potter signatures. We set up a field experiment with 5 expert Nepalese potters, asking them to produce 3 shapes (replicated 5 times). The 2D profiles of the experimental productions were analyzed with a shape analysis method borrowed from biology. In a complementary experiment focusing on shape discrimination, the participants were asked to visually identify their own productions and those of their colleagues. Results indicated that the potters produced slightly but significantly different shapes. We assume that during apprenticeship individuals developed their own motor skills, which reflect upon the finished products. Interpreting shape variability in terms of individuals could provide supplementary information on the social organization of the production, either for modern or ancient periods. As for shape discrimination, our preliminary results indicated that a few potters visually distinguished individual signatures. Those craftsmen could play a key role in the selection and evolution of the traditional ceramic shapes.

[1]  Thelma Coyle,et al.  Copying errors of potters from three cultures: Predictable directions for a so-called random phenomenon , 2014 .

[2]  E. Gibson.  How to think about perceptual learning: Twenty-five years later. , 1992 .

[3]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  When handicraft experts face novelty: Effects of shape and wheel familiarity on individual and community standardization of ceramic vessels , 2014 .

[4]  Carl P. Lipo,et al.  Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record , 2005 .

[5]  Carl P. Lipo,et al.  Cultural Transmission Theory and the Archaeological Record: Providing Context to Understanding Variation and Temporal Changes in Material Culture , 2007 .

[6]  Irving Rouse,et al.  Archaeological constructs : an aspect of theoretical archaeology , 1982 .

[7]  Kacy L. Hollenback.  Behavioral Archaeology , 2018, The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.

[8]  James Steele,et al.  Ceramic diversity, random copying, and tests for selectivity in ceramic production , 2010 .

[9]  B. Saraswati,et al.  Pottery techniques in peasant India , 1966 .

[10]  Olivier Gosselain,et al.  Materializing Identities: An African Perspective , 2000 .

[11]  Guillaume Rao,et al.  Regulation of pendulum length as a control mechanism in performing the backward giant circle in gymnastics. , 2009, Human movement science.

[12]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  An Experimental Test of the Accumulated Copying Error Model of Cultural Mutation for Acheulean Handaxe Size , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  How Can Ten Fingers Shape a Pot? Evidence for Equivalent Function in Culturally Distinct Motor Skills , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  Copying Error and the Cultural Evolution of “Additive” vs. “Reductive” Material Traditions: An Experimental Assessment , 2014, American Antiquity.

[15]  Martin H. Levinson.  Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution , 2006 .

[16]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[17]  Ethan Cochrane,et al.  Migration and Cultural Transmission: Investigating Human Movement as Explanation for Fijian Ceramic Change , 2008 .

[18]  W. Dickinson,et al.  Plainware ceramics from Sāmoa: Insights into ceramic chronology, cultural transmission, and selection among colonizing populations , 2013 .

[19]  Keith Jones,et al.  Not by genes alone , 2006 .

[20]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[21]  The village clay: recursive innovations and community self-fashioning among Sinhalese potters , 2009 .

[22]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[23]  K. Newell.  Motor skill acquisition. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  O. Gosselain,et al.  Technology and Style: Potters and Pottery Among Bafia of Cameroon , 1992 .

[25]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[26]  Blandine Bril,et al.  Movement Pattern Variability in Stone Knapping: Implications for the Development of Percussive Traditions , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  Blandine Bril,et al.  Learning to Use Tools: A Functional Approach to Action , 2015 .

[28]  Carol Kramer,et al.  Pottery in Rajasthan : ethnoarchaeology in two Indian cities , 1997 .

[29]  Clive Orton,et al.  HOW MANY POTS MAKE FIVE?—AN HISTORICAL REVIEW OF POTTERY QUANTIFICATION , 1993 .

[30]  G. M,et al.  Motor Development in Children : Aspects of Coordination and Control , 2011 .

[31]  O. Rye.  POTTERY MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES: X‐RAY STUDIES , 1977 .

[32]  Charles R. Giardina,et al.  Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[33]  P. Mielke,et al.  Permutation Methods: A Distance Function Approach , 2007 .

[34]  Robert Whallon,et al.  A New Approach to Pottery Typology , 1972, American Antiquity.

[35]  P. Roe.  Art and Residence Among the Shipibo Indians of Peru: A Study in Microacculturation , 1980 .

[36]  Briggs Buchanan,et al.  The accumulation of stochastic copying errors causes drift in culturally transmitted technologies: Quantifying Clovis evolutionary dynamics , 2009 .

[37]  Ross Parry,et al.  Tool use ability depends on understanding of functional dynamics and not specific joint contribution profiles , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[38]  B. Bril.  Apprentissage et contexte , 2002 .

[39]  Burt,et al.  Natural selection in the wild. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  Melissa B. Hagstrum,et al.  Standardization, Labor Investment, Skill, and the Organization of Ceramic Production in Late Prehispanic Highland Peru , 1995, American Antiquity.

[41]  V. Roux.  Ceramic Standardization and Intensity of Production: Quantifying Degrees of Specialization , 2003, American Antiquity.

[42]  N. A. Bernstein,et al.  The Primacy of Action in Development , 2014 .

[43]  J. Endler,et al.  The Relative Success of Some Methods for Measuring and Describing the Shape of Complex Objects , 1998 .

[44]  Jonathan T. Thomas,et al.  Revisiting the Individual in Prehistory: Idiosyncratic Engraving Variation and the Neolithic Slate Plaques of the Iberian Peninsula , 2009 .

[45]  R. Bootsma,et al.  A proxy of potters’ throwing skill: ceramic vessels considered in terms of mechanical stress , 2011 .

[46]  C. Morris.  Hands Up for the Individual! The Role of Attribution Studies in Aegean Prehistory , 1993, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[47]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The effect of genetic linkage on the mean fitness of a population. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  A. Pierret.  Analyse technologique des céramiques archéologiques : développements méthodologiques pour l'identification des techniques de façonnage ; un exemple d'application : le matériel du village des Arènes à Levroux (Indre) , 1995 .

[49]  James N. Hill,et al.  Individuals and Their Artifacts: An Experimental Study in Archaeology , 1978, American Antiquity.

[50]  Guillaume Rao,et al.  On the organizing role of nonmuscular forces during performance of a giant circle in gymnastics. , 2012, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[51]  Uzy Smilansky,et al.  Computerized morphological classification of ceramics , 2011 .

[52]  James M. Skibo,et al.  The Explanation of Artifact Variability , 1997, American Antiquity.