Should the Music Industry Sue Its Own Customers? Impacts of Music Piracy and Policy Suggestions

Two beliefs about music piracy prevail in the music industry. First, music piracy hurts music record sales. Second, the only copyright regime that can help the music industry is one that will eradicate music piracy. To test the two beliefs, I construct a unique survey data set, estimate the demand for music and iPods and show three things. First, music piracy does hurt record sales. Second, music piracy contributes 20% to iPod sales. Finally, counterfactuals experiments show that while a regime without music piracy benefits music producers at the expense of students and Apple, another regime with legal online music and iPod royalty benefits most students and music producers at the expense of Apple. ∗I am indebted to my advisor Pat Bajari for his continuous encouragement and support. I benefit from the suggestions of Tom Holmes, Kyoo il Kim, Om Narasimhan, Minjung Park, Amil Petrin, Hakki Yazici, and seminar participants at Bates White, Colby College, Columbia University, Federal Reserve Bank at Kansas City and University of Minnesota. I also thank Dulguun Batbold, Andrew Cassey, John Dalton, Tom Holmes, Nick Guo, Christos Ioannou, Ka Fai Li, Mallory Leung, Tina Marsh, Connan Snider, and Junichi Suzuki for their help in conducting the survey. Lastly I am grateful to the Economics department of the University of Minnesota for financial support. The usual disclaimer applies. Correspondence: tleung@cuhk.edu.hk

[1]  S. Liebowitz File Sharing: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?* , 2006, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  Alejandro Zentner Measuring the Effect of File Sharing on Music Purchases* , 2006, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  D. Hensher Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice , 1994 .

[4]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Using Discrete Choice Models with Experimental Design Data to Forecast Consumer Demand for a Unique Cultural Event , 1983 .

[5]  Neil Weinstock Netanel,et al.  Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing , 2003 .

[6]  M. Kremer Patent Buy-Outs: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation , 1997 .

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[8]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[9]  B. Orme Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research , 2005 .

[10]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Invention, Growth, and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change by William D. Nordhaus (review) , 1969, Technology and Culture.

[11]  Aviv Nevo A Practitioner's Guide to Estimation of Random‐Coefficients Logit Models of Demand , 2000 .

[12]  M. Peitz,et al.  The Effect of Internet Piracy on Music Sales: Cross-Section Evidence , 2004 .

[13]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Music for a Song: An Empirical Look at Uniform Song Pricing and its Alternatives , 2009 .

[14]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2005 .

[15]  J. Marsden,et al.  Impact of Legal Threats on Online Music Sharing Activity: An Analysis of Music Industry Legal Actions* , 2006, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  Amil Petrin Quantifying the Benefits of New Products: The Case of the Minivan , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[18]  David K. Levine,et al.  Against Intellectual Monopoly , 2008 .

[19]  Felix Oberholzer-Gee,et al.  The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  A Douglas,et al.  Promises to keep. , 1984, Thorax.

[21]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .