The rotating-wave approximation: consistency and applicability from an open quantum system analysis

We provide an in-depth and thorough treatment of the validity of the rotating-wave approximation (RWA) in an open quantum system. We find that when it is introduced after tracing out the environment all timescales of the open system are correctly reproduced, but the details of the quantum state in general will not be. The RWA made before the trace is more problematic: it results in incorrect values for environmentally induced shifts to system frequencies, and the resulting theory has no Markovian limit. In either form, the RWA gives an inaccurate quantum state which makes it inappropriate for calculating entanglement dynamics or similar detailed properties of the state dynamics. We also emphasize the fact that even under the RWA the master equation for a combination of systems and external forces is not a simple combination of the master equations of the systems and forces. Such a combination may be tempting, because the RWA guarantees that a master equation so constructed will have a valid mathematical form; however, it will not accurately reflect the dynamics of the physical system. To obtain the correct master equation for the composite system a proper consideration of the non-Markovian dynamics is required.

[1]  B. Hu,et al.  Two-Level Atom-Field Interaction: Exact Master Equations for Non-Markovian Dynamics, Decoherence and Relaxation , 1999, quant-ph/9901078.

[2]  J. Piilo,et al.  Microscopic derivation of the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity losses , 2006, quant-ph/0610140.

[3]  G. Agarwal.  Rotating-Wave Approximation and Spontaneous Emission , 1971 .

[4]  Francesco Petruccione,et al.  The Theory of Open Quantum Systems , 2002 .

[5]  B. Hu,et al.  Temporal and spatial dependence of quantum entanglement from a field theory perspective , 2008, 0812.4391.

[6]  V. I. Tatarskii.  Corrections to the theory of photocounting , 1990, Annual Meeting Optical Society of America.

[7]  G. Lindblad.  On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , 1976 .

[8]  V. I. Tatarskii,et al.  Causality violation in the Glauber theory of photodetection , 1989 .

[9]  Bei-Lok Hu,et al.  Non-Markovian entanglement dynamics of two qubits interacting with a common electromagnetic field , 2009, Quantum Inf. Process..

[10]  S. Chumakov,et al.  Resonance expansion versus the rotating-wave approximation , 2003 .

[11]  S. Attal,et al.  Open Quantum Systems II , 2006 .

[12]  Ting Yu,et al.  Convolutionless Non-Markovian master equations and quantum trajectories: Brownian motion , 2004 .

[13]  Göran Lindblad,et al.  Non-equilibrium entropy and irreversibility , 1983 .

[14]  H. Carmichael.  Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 , 1999 .

[15]  R. Zwanzig.  Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics , 2001, Physics Subject Headings (PhySH).

[16]  R. Glauber.  Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field , 1963 .

[17]  C. H. Fleming,et al.  Exact analytical solutions to the master equation of quantum Brownian motion for a general environment , 2010, 1004.1603.

[18]  M. Fleischhauer.  Quantum-theory of photodetection without the rotating wave approximation , 1998 .

[19]  Paz,et al.  Quantum Brownian motion in a general environment: Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and colored noise. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[20]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  A. Clerk,et al.  Nonlocality and the Rotating Wave Approximation , 1998 .

[22]  Collett,et al.  Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[23]  E. Davies,et al.  Markovian master equations. II , 1976 .

[24]  I. D. Vega,et al.  Non-Markovian reduced propagator, multiple-time correlation functions, and master equations with general initial conditions in the weak-coupling limit , 2006 .

[25]  On the rotating wave approximation , 1984 .

[26]  R. Glauber.  The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence , 1963 .

[27]  A. Kossakowski,et al.  On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems , 1972 .

[28]  E. Davies,et al.  Markovian master equations , 1974 .

[29]  G. W. Ford,et al.  The rotating wave approximation (RWA) of quantum optics: serious defect , 1997 .

[30]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems , 1976 .

[31]  N. Kampen,et al.  Langevin and master equation in quantum mechanics , 1997 .

[32]  The limits of the rotating wave approximation in electromagnetic field propagation in a cavity , 2005, quant-ph/0512146.

[33]  Non-Markovian dynamics in a spin star system: Exact solution and approximation techniques , 2004, quant-ph/0401051.

[34]  G. Agarwal.  Quantum statistical theories of spontaneous emission and their relation to other approaches , 1974 .

[35]  Augusto J. Roncaglia,et al.  Dynamical phases for the evolution of the entanglement between two oscillators coupled to the same environment , 2008, 0809.1676.

[36]  Igor Volovich,et al.  Quantum Theory and Its Stochastic Limit , 2002 .

[37]  Man-Duen Choi.  Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices , 1975 .

[38]  James,et al.  Photodetection and causality in quantum optics. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[39]  Quantum Entanglement under Non-Markovian Dynamics of Two Qubits Interacting with a common Electromagnetic Field , 2006, quant-ph/0610007.

[40]  Francesco Petruccione,et al.  Destruction of quantum coherence through emission of bremsstrahlung , 2001 .

[41]  J. Piilo,et al.  Cavity losses for the dissipative Jaynes–Cummings Hamiltonian beyond rotating wave approximation , 2007, 0709.1614.

[42]  S. Swain.  Master equation derivation of quantum regression theorem , 1981 .

[43]  J. Paz,et al.  Dynamics of the entanglement between two oscillators in the same environment. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[44]  Edward Davies.  Quantum dynamical semigroups and the neutron diffusion equation , 1977 .