Feasibility of Round Window Stimulation by a Novel Electromagnetic Microactuator

Introduction Most implantable hearing aids currently available were developed to compensate the sensorineural hearing loss by driving middle ear structures (e.g., the ossicles). These devices are successfully used in round window (RW) stimulation clinically, although this was initially not the intended use. Here, a novel microactuator, specifically designed for RW stimulation, was tested in human temporal bones to determine actuator performance and applicability. Methods Stapes footplate response to RW stimulation was determined experimentally in human temporal bones and the obtained sound pressure output level was estimated. Results The actuator had a flat displacement response between 0.125 and 4 kHz, a resonance between 4 and 7 kHz, and a roll-off above. At increasing contact force, the stapes footplate displacement decreased by 5–10 dB re μm for forces ≥ 2 mN. The equivalent sound pressure level between 0.125 and 4 kHz amounted to 87–97 eq dB SPL and increased to 117 eq dB SPL for frequencies of 4–7 kHz. The total harmonic distortion (THD) of the actuator ranged within 15–40% for static forces of 5 mN. Conclusion The feasibility of an electromagnetic actuator that may be placed into the RW niche was demonstrated but requires further optimization in terms of THD and static force sensitivity.

[1]  Christian Streitberger,et al.  Coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge to Cochlea Round Window: Auditory Results in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  Rudolf Häusler,et al.  A Novel Implantable Hearing System with Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation , 2008, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  Daniel J. Tollin,et al.  Round Window Membrane Implantation with an Active Middle Ear Implant: A Study of the Effects on the Performance of Round Window Exposure and Transducer Tip Diameter in Human Cadaveric Temporal Bones , 2010, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[5]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review , 2015, Medical devices.

[6]  S. Merchant,et al.  Testing a Method for Quantifying the Output of Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Devices , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[7]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator , 2013, Hearing Research.

[8]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation , 2010, Hearing Research.

[9]  Jin-Ho Cho,et al.  A tri-coil bellows-type round window transducer with improved frequency characteristics for middle-ear implants , 2016, Hearing Research.

[10]  Sigfrid D. Soli,et al.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[11]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The Hannover Coupler: Controlled Static Prestress in Round Window Stimulation With the Floating Mass Transducer. , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  R A Ruth,et al.  The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach. , 1995, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[13]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Actuator: Exploring Alternative Stimulation Sites and Their Stimulation Efficiency , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  S. Sommerfeldt Handbook of Noise and Vibration Control , 2008 .