Class separation of buildings with high and low prevalence of SBS by principal component analysis.

In this study, we were able to separate buildings with high and low prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS) using principal component analysis. The prevalence of SBS was defined by the presence of at least one typical skin, mucosal and general (headache and fatigue) symptom. Data from the Swedish Office Illness Study describing the presence and level of chemical compounds in outdoor, supply, and room air, respectively, were evaluated together with information about the buildings in six models. When all data were included the most complex model was able to separate 71% of the high prevalence buildings from the low prevalence buildings. The most important variable that separates the high prevalence buildings from the low prevalence buildings was a more frequent occurrence or a higher concentration of compounds with shorter retention time in the high prevalence buildings. Elevated relative humidity in supply and room air and higher levels of total volatile organic compounds in outdoor and supply air were more common in high prevalence buildings. Ten building variables also contributed to the separation of the two classes of low and high prevalence buildings.

[1]  S. Wold,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis in Chemistry , 1984 .

[2]  W J Fisk,et al.  Associations between indoor CO2 concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in U.S. office buildings: an analysis of the 1994-1996 BASE study data. , 2000, Indoor air.

[3]  J. D. Cooley,et al.  Correlation between the prevalence of certain fungi and sick building syndrome. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[4]  J Sundell,et al.  The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in office workers. A case-referent study of personal, psychosocial and building-related risk indicators. , 1994, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  Andrew P. Jones,et al.  Indoor air quality and health , 1999 .

[6]  Jan Sundell,et al.  Volatile Organic Compounds in Ventilating Air in Buildings at Different Sampling Points in the Buildings and their Relationship with the Prevalence of Occupant Symptoms , 1993 .

[7]  Jan Sundell,et al.  Indoor Air Humidity And Sensation Of Dryness As Risk Indicators Of Sbs , 1993 .

[8]  Jan Sundell,et al.  A Prevalence Study Of The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) And Facial Skin Symptoms In Office Workers , 1993 .

[9]  Geo Clausen,et al.  TVOC and Health in Non-industrial Indoor Environments , 1997 .

[10]  P. Fanger,et al.  The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. , 2000, Indoor air.

[11]  D Norbäck,et al.  Nasal and ocular symptoms, tear film stability and biomarkers in nasal lavage, in relation to building-dampness and building design in hospitals , 1999, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[12]  A. Apter,et al.  Epidemiology of the sick building syndrome. , 1994, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[13]  B. Stenberg,et al.  Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men? , 1995, Social Science & Medicine (1967).

[14]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components: Jackson/User's Guide to Principal Components , 2004 .

[15]  W. Fisk,et al.  Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. , 1999, Indoor air.