Smart Collections: Can Artificial Intelligence Tools and Techniques Assist with Discovering, Evaluating and Tagging Digital Learning Resources?.

This paper reports on a joint proof of concept project undertaken by researchers from the Flinders University Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in partnership with information managers from the Education Network Australia (edna) team at Education Services Australia to address the question of whether artificial intelligence techniques could be employed to help with creation and consistency of learning resource metadata and improve the efficiency of digital collection workflows? The results show some success with automated subject categorisation on a small sample, and the researchers conclude that automated classification based on artificial intelligence is useful as a means of supplementing and assisting human classification, but is not at this stage a replacement for human classification of educational resources.

[1]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  Machine learning in automated text categorization , 2001, CSUR.

[2]  Gordon W. Paynter,et al.  Developing practical automatic metadata assignment and evaluation tools for internet resources , 2005, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '05).

[3]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  User keyword preference: the Nwords and Rwords experiments , 2008, Int. J. Internet Protoc. Technol..

[4]  Erik Duval,et al.  Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories , 2009, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[5]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: a survey of metadata experts' opinions , 2006, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[6]  Pavel Velikhov,et al.  Semantic Relatedness Metric for Wikipedia Concepts Based on Link Analysis and its Application to Word Sense Disambiguation , 2008, SYRCoDIS.

[7]  Simone Paolo Ponzetto,et al.  Knowledge Derived From Wikipedia For Computing Semantic Relatedness , 2007, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[8]  Erik Duval,et al.  Automating metadata generation: the simple indexing interface , 2005, WWW '05.

[9]  Dl Rowlands Real World Metadata Management for Resource Discovery: proof of concept across education and library sectors in Tasmania , 2004 .

[10]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Verb similarity on the taxonomy of WordNet , 2006 .

[11]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Measuring Semantic Similarity in the Taxonomy of WordNet , 2005, ACSC.

[12]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts , 2004, NAACL.

[13]  Nick Lothian,et al.  Towards Linked Education Data: Metadata Extraction Projects for Education Network Australia (edna) , 2009, Dublin Core Conference.

[14]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness , 2006, CL.

[15]  Juan Enrique Ramos,et al.  Using TF-IDF to Determine Word Relevance in Document Queries , 2003 .

[16]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.