Word-of-mouth marketing influence on offline and online communications: Evidence from case study research

This case study reports results from three research studies conducted over 12 weeks as part of a product seeding campaign. Partnering with a word-of-mouth marketing (WOMM) agency for this research, studies 1 and 2 report agency-conducted surveys of campaign participants' online and offline word-of-mouth (WOM) behaviors. Study 3 deployed an innovative web-based methodology to map and visualize WOM communication patterns, to reveal how campaign-related conversations spread within and across offline friendship networks and the role played by tie strength in that process. We find that agency reports of WOMM campaign results overstate reach and understate frequency. Our results have implications for the measurement of reach and frequency of WOMM campaigns.

[1]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[2]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[3]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[4]  M. V. Valkenburg Network Analysis , 1964 .

[5]  J. Mancuso,et al.  Why Not Create Opinion Leaders for New Product Introductions? , 1969 .

[6]  J. Davis Clustering and Hierarchy in Interpersonal Relations: Testing Two Graph Theoretical Models on 742 Sociomatrices , 1970 .

[7]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  J. Holmes,et al.  Product sampling and word of mouth. , 1977 .

[9]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[11]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[12]  Jerome B. Kernan,et al.  Analysis of Referral Networks in Marketing: Methods and Illustration , 1986 .

[13]  Lawrence J. Marks,et al.  The Use of Product Sampling and Advertising: Effects of Sequence of Exposure and Degree of Advertising Claim Exaggeration on Consumers’ Belief Strength, Belief Confidence, and Attitudes , 1988 .

[14]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[15]  Colin McDonald Advertising Reach and Frequency: Maximizing Advertising Results Through Effective Frequency , 1995 .

[16]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  An Approach for Determining Optimal Product Sampling for the Diffusion of a New Product , 1995 .

[17]  Cynthia M. Webster,et al.  Word-Of-Mouth Communications: a Motivational Analysis , 1998 .

[18]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[19]  M. McPherson,et al.  BIRDS OF A FEATHER: Homophily , 2001 .

[20]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[21]  K. Seltman Marketing for management. , 2004, Marketing health services.

[22]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Network Analysis in Marketing , 2004 .

[23]  Yong Liu Word-of-Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue , 2006 .

[24]  Andy Sernovitz,et al.  Word of Mouth Marketing: How Smart Companies Get People Talking , 2006 .

[25]  Tamás Nepusz,et al.  Measuring tie-strength in virtual social networks , 2006 .

[26]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Networks of strong ties , 2006, cond-mat/0605279.

[27]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Mary Walker,et al.  Teen perceptions of disclosure in buzz marketing , 2007 .

[29]  Marco Gonzalez,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Social Networks Tastes, Ties, and Time: a New Social Network Dataset Using Facebook.com , 2022 .

[30]  K. Ruyter,et al.  Social Capital Production in a Virtual P3 Community , 2008 .

[31]  Bernie Hogan,et al.  A Comparison of On and Offline Networks through the Facebook API , 2008 .

[32]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[33]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[35]  David Godes,et al.  Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[36]  Sarah J. S. Wilner,et al.  Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities , 2009 .

[37]  Michael Breazeale FORUM - Word of Mouse - An Assessment of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Research , 2009 .

[38]  I. N. A. C. I. J. H. Fowler Book Review: Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. , 2009 .

[39]  Yunjae Cheong,et al.  The Power of Reach and Frequency In the Age of Digital Advertising , 2010, Journal of Advertising Research.

[40]  Federico DeGregorio The Power of Reach and Frequency In the Age of Digital Advertising: Offline and Online Media Demand Different Metrics , 2010 .

[41]  W. Reinartz,et al.  Customer Engagement as a New Perspective in Customer Management , 2010 .

[42]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates , 2010 .

[43]  X. Zhang,et al.  Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics , 2010 .

[44]  L. Huang Social contagion effects in experiential information exchange on bulletin board systems , 2010 .

[45]  Jan U. Becker,et al.  Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An Empirical Comparison , 2011 .

[46]  S. Gaarenstroom What's all the buzz about? , 2011 .

[47]  L. Hollebeek Exploring customer brand engagement: definition and themes , 2011 .

[48]  Eric M. Schwartz,et al.  What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth? , 2011 .

[49]  Byron Sharp,et al.  What's Not to “Like?” , 2012, Journal of Advertising Research.