Enhancement of fracture healing with autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts.

The factors contributing to a delayed union or nonunion are many. In general they may be divided into three major categories: deficiencies in vascularity and angiogenesis, deficiencies in the robustness of the chondroosseous response, and deficiencies in stability, strain, or physical continuity. Frequently, deficiencies in more than one category are present, thus complicating the approach to therapy. For a bone grafts to enhance fracture healing, it must provide or stimulate that which is deficient. Autogenous fresh cancellous and cortical bone most frequently are used, but other common grafts include allogeneic frozen, freeze dried, or processed allogeneic cortical, corticocancellous and cancellous grafts, and demineralized bone matrix. These grafts have varying capacities to provide active bone formation, to induce bone formation by cells of the surrounding soft tissue, and to serve as a substrate for bone formation. However, the graft cannot exert its biologic activity in isolation, dependent as it is on the surrounding environment for cells to respond to its signals and, in some cases, for blood supply. The mechanical environment of the graft site is also important. Successful graft incorporation requires that an appropriate match must be made between the biologic activity of a bone graft, the condition of the perigraft environment, and the mechanical environment. The task of the clinician who performs a bone grafting procedure for the enhancement of fracture healing is to choose the right graft or combination of grafts for the biologic and mechanical environment into which the graft will be placed.

[1]  M. Bostrom,et al.  Bone growth factors. , 2000, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[2]  A. Garg,et al.  Fractures in Large Segment Allografts , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  H. Chandler,et al.  Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - The Role of Allografts in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures*† , 1997 .

[4]  K. Schomacker,et al.  Improved osteoinduction of cortical bone allografts: A study of the effects of laser perforation and partial demineralization , 1997, Journal of Orthopaedic Research.

[5]  V. Goldberg,et al.  The Humoral Response to Vascular and Nonvascular Allografts of Bone , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Ethylene oxide sterilization impairs allograft incorporation in a conduction chamber. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  S. Emery,et al.  Biologic and Biomechanic Evaluation of Posterior Lumbar Fusion in the Rabbit| The Effect of Fixation Rigidity , 1995, Spine.

[8]  G. Balian,et al.  Demineralized bone matrix in the stabilization of porous-coated implants in bone defects in rabbits. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  D. Muscolo,et al.  Massive femoral allografts followed for 22 to 36 years. Report of six cases. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  S. Stevenson,et al.  The fate of cancellous and cortical bone after transplantation of fresh and frozen tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  W. Enneking,et al.  Observations on massive retrieved human allografts. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  G. Friedlaender,et al.  Induction of specific T-cell responsiveness to allogeneic bone. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Dose-dependent reduction of bone inductive properties by ethylene oxide. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  L A Whitaker,et al.  The effect of rigid fixation on the survival of onlay bone grafts: an experimental study. , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  R. Russell,et al.  Constitutive and inducible expression of HLA class II determinants by human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. , 1990, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  T. Malinin,et al.  Noncemented acetabular revision arthroplasty using allograft bone. , 1989, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[17]  E. Munting,et al.  Effect of sterilization on osteoinduction. Comparison of five methods in demineralized rat bone. , 1988, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[18]  S. Stevenson The immune response to osteochondral allografts in dogs. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  D. Muscolo,et al.  Tissue-typing in human massive allografts of frozen bone. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  D. Davy,et al.  Biology of vascularized bone grafts. , 1987, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[21]  Springfield Ds Massive autogenous bone grafts. , 1987 .

[22]  G. Balian,et al.  The use of demineralized bone matrix in the repair of segmental defects. Augmentation with extracted matrix proteins and a comparison with autologous grafts. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  R. Dickson Recent advances in orthopaedics. , 1984, Orthopedics.

[24]  R. Pelker,et al.  Biomechanical properties of bone allografts. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Use of Demineralized Allogeneic Bone Implants for the Correction of Maxillocraniofacial Deformities , 1981, Annals of surgery.

[26]  W. Enneking,et al.  Freeze-dried allogeneic segmental cortical-bone grafts in dogs. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  K. Doi,et al.  Bone grafts with microvascular anastomoses of vascular pedicles: an experimental study in dogs. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  D. Muscolo,et al.  In vitro studies of transplantation antigens present on bone cells in the rat. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  K. Pritzker,et al.  The immunogenicity of fresh and frozen allogeneic bone. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  R. D. Ray Vascularization of Bone Grafts and Implants , 1972, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  Bassett Ca Clinical implications of cell function in bone grafting. , 1972 .

[32]  K. Heiple,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE HEALING PROCESS FOLLOWING DIFFERENT TYPES OF BONE TRANSPLANTATION. , 1963, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  M. Bonfiglio Repair of bone transplant fractures. , 1958, Surgical forum.

[34]  W. Enneking Histological investigation of bone transplants in immunologically prepared animals. , 1957, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  A. Kushner EVALUATION OF WOLFF'S LAW OF BONE FORMATION , 1940 .

[36]  P. D. Di Cesare,et al.  Osteoinductive agents. Basic science and clinical applications. , 1995, American journal of orthopedics.

[37]  R. V. Vander Griend The effect of internal fixation on the healing of large allografts. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  J. Wiedel,et al.  Allograft use in orthopedic surgery. , 1994, Orthopedics.

[39]  W. Paule,et al.  Postmortem degradation of demineralized bone matrix osteoinductive potential. Effect of time and storage temperature. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  M. Chapman,et al.  Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[41]  D. Springfield Massive autogenous bone grafts. , 1987, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[42]  K. Heiple,et al.  The effect of histocompatibility matching on canine frozen bone allografts. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[43]  M. Elves Humoral immune response to allografts of bone. , 1974, International archives of allergy and applied immunology.

[44]  C. Bassett Clinical implications of cell function in bone grafting. , 1972, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.