Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.

Two experiments used eye-tracking procedures to investigate the relationship between attention and associative learning in human participants. These experiments found greater overt attention to cues experienced as predictive of the outcomes with which they were paired, than to cues experienced as nonpredictive. Moreover, this attentional bias persisted into a second training phase when all cues were equally predictive of the outcomes with which they were paired, and it was accompanied by a related bias in the rate of learning about these cues. These findings are consistent with the attentional model of associative learning proposed by Mackintosh (1975), but not with that proposed by Pearce and Hall (1980).

[1]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[2]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[3]  Geoffrey Hall Perceptual and associative learning , 1991 .

[4]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Dimensional Relevance Shifts in Category Learning , 1996, Connect. Sci..

[5]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[6]  Anthony Dickinson,et al.  The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Causal learning: an associative analysis. , 2001 .

[7]  J. Kruschke Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning , 2001 .

[8]  I. Mclaren,et al.  Learned Associability and Associative Change in Human Causal Learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  T. Beckers,et al.  Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  J. Kruschke Attention in Learning , 2003 .

[11]  M. Pelley The Role of Associative History in Models of Associative Learning: A Selective Review and a Hybrid Model: , 2004 .

[12]  Aaron B. Hoffman,et al.  Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Aaron B. Hoffman,et al.  Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Geoffrey Hall,et al.  Acquired distinctiveness and equivalence in human discrimination learning: Evidence for an attentional process , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  J. Kruschke,et al.  Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Drug expectancy is necessary for stimulus control of human attention, instrumental drug-seeking behaviour and subjective pleasure , 2006, Psychopharmacology.

[17]  I. Mclaren,et al.  Blocking and unblocking in human causal learning. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  M. L. Le Pelley,et al.  Blocking of Human Causal Learning Involves Learned Changes in Stimulus Processing , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  A. Dickinson,et al.  The role of drug expectancy in the control of human drug seeking. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  Andy J. Wills,et al.  Predictive Learning, Prediction Errors, and Attention: Evidence from Event-related Potentials and Eye Tracking , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Attention and expectation in human predictive learning: The role of uncertainty , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Orienting of Attention , 2008 .

[23]  M. L. Le Pelley,et al.  Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[24]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Detection versus sustained attention to drug cues have dissociable roles in mediating drug seeking behavior. , 2009, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[25]  M. Pelley,et al.  Disentangling the attentional deficit in schizophrenia: Pointers from schizotypy , 2010, Psychiatry Research.

[26]  Christopher J. Mitchell,et al.  Attention and Associative Learning: From Brain to Behaviour , 2010 .

[27]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Selective attention to conditioned stimuli in human discrimination learning: Untangling the effect of outcome prediction, valence, arousal and uncertainty , 2010 .

[28]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Two theories of attention: a review and a possible integration , 2010 .

[29]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Acquired distinctiveness and equivalence: a synthesis , 2010 .

[30]  Tom Beesley,et al.  Stereotype formation: biased by association. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  M. Pelley,et al.  The effect of predictive history on the learning of sub-sequence contingencies , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  M. Pelley,et al.  Learned predictiveness effects following single-cue training in humans , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[33]  M. L. Le Pelley,et al.  The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.