Forecasting the Allocation Ratio of Carbon Emission Allowance Currency for 2020 and 2030 in China

Many countries and scholars have used various strategies to improve and optimize the allocation ratios for carbon emission allowances. This issue is more urgent for China due to the uneven development across the country. This paper proposes a new method that divides low-carbon economy development processes into two separate periods: from 2020 to 2029 and from 2030 to 2050. These two periods have unique requirements and emissions reduction potential; therefore, they must involve different allocation methods, so that reduction behaviors do not stall the development of regional low-carbon economies. During the first period, a more deterministic economic development approach for the carbon emission allowance allocation ratio should be used. During the second period, more adaptive and optimized policy guidance should be employed. We developed a low-carbon economy index evaluation system using the entropy weight method to measure information filtering levels. We conducted vector autoregressive correlation tests, consulted 60 experts for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, and we conducted max-min standardized data processing tests. This article presents first- and second-period carbon emission allowance models in combination with a low-carbon economy index evaluation system. Finally, we forecast reasonable carbon emission allowance allocation ratios for China for the periods starting in 2020 and 2030. A good allocation ratio for the carbon emission allowance can help boost China’s economic development and help the country reach its energy conservation and emissions reduction goals.

[1]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Multi-region comparisons of emission performance: The structural decomposition analysis approach , 2016 .

[2]  Yan Xu,et al.  Forecasting the Allocative Efficiency of Carbon Emission Allowance Financial Assets in China at the Provincial Level in 2020 , 2016 .

[3]  Matthias Klumpp,et al.  To Green or Not to Green: A Political, Economic and Social Analysis for the Past Failure of Green Logistics , 2016 .

[4]  Wei Wang,et al.  Measuring the Total-Factor Carbon Emission Performance of Industrial Land Use in China Based on the Global Directional Distance Function and Non-Radial Luenberger Productivity Index , 2016 .

[5]  Xiongfeng Pan,et al.  Analysis of the Threshold Effect of Financial Development on China’s Carbon Intensity , 2016 .

[6]  Tao Sun,et al.  Effect of Population Structure Change on Carbon Emission in China , 2016 .

[7]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Industrial Carbon Emissions of China’s Regions: A Spatial Econometric Analysis , 2016 .

[8]  Lixin Miao,et al.  Innovative Carbon Allowance Allocation Policy for the Shenzhen Emission Trading Scheme in China , 2015 .

[9]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Multiplicative decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity change using input–output analysis , 2015 .

[10]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving Potential in China: A Directional Meta-Frontier DEA Approach , 2014 .

[11]  Shenghui Cui,et al.  A model for developing a target integrated low carbon city indicator system: The case of Xiamen, China , 2014 .

[12]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Provincial allocation of carbon emission reduction targets in China: An approach based on improved fuzzy cluster and Shapley value decomposition , 2014 .

[13]  Li Yang,et al.  Low-carbon City in China , 2013 .

[14]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020 , 2013 .

[15]  Lakshman S. Thakur,et al.  Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  H. Bloch,et al.  Coal consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth in China: Empirical evidence and policy responses , 2012 .

[17]  J. Chipman,et al.  Detrimental externalities, pollution rights, and the “Coase theorem” , 2012 .

[18]  Yanrui Wu,et al.  Energy intensity and its determinants in China's regional economies , 2012 .

[19]  Pan Jiahua,et al.  Energy Embodied in Goods in International Trade of China: Calculation and Policy Implications , 2011 .

[20]  Stefano Clò,et al.  Grandfathering, auctioning and Carbon Leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS Directive , 2010 .

[21]  Ruhul Salim,et al.  Temporal Causality between Energy Consumption and Income in Six Asian Emerging Countries , 2009 .

[22]  Shuddhasattwa Rafiq,et al.  Causality And Dynamics Of Energy Consumption And Output: Evidence From Non-Oecd Asian Countries , 2008 .

[23]  Guiyang Zhuang How Will China Move Towards Becoming a Low Carbon Economy? , 2008 .

[24]  武彦 福島 持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[25]  Bettina Schmitt-Rady A Level Playing Field? Initial Allocation of Allowances in Member States , 2006 .

[26]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China , 2015 .

[27]  Chen De-min Regional Carbon Trading Mode and Its Implementation Path , 2012 .

[28]  H. Bloch,et al.  Coal consumption , CO 2 emission and economic growth in China : Empirical evidence and policy responses ☆ , 2012 .

[29]  Jingya Hu An Analysis on Construction of Low-carbon Economic based on Evolutionary Game——Interaction between the Local Government and Enterprises , 2011 .

[30]  Gao Qing-xian,et al.  Conceptual Identification and Evaluation Index System for Low Carbon Economy , 2010 .

[31]  Guo Qiang,et al.  Construction of Assessment Index System of Low Carbon Society , 2010 .

[32]  Frank Gagelmann The influence of the allocation method on market liquidity, volatility and firms’ investment decisions , 2008 .

[33]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme: Unifying themes , 2007 .

[34]  M. Peeters,et al.  EU Climate Change Policy: The Challenge of New Regulatory Initiatives , 2006 .