Classical ODE and PDE which Obey Quantum Dynamics

It is well known that classical systems governed by ODE or PDE can have extremely complex emergent properties. Many researchers have asked: is it possible that the statistical correlations which emerge over time in classical systems would allow effects as complex as those generated by quantum field theory (QFT)? For example, could parallel computation based on classical statistical correlations in systems based on continuous variables, distributed over space, possibly be as powerful as quantum computing based on entanglement? This paper proves that the answer to this question is essentially "yes," with certain caveats. More precisely, the paper shows that the statistics of many classical ODE and PDE systems obey dynamics remarkably similar to the Heisenberg dynamics of the corresponding quantum field theory (QFT). It supports Einstein's conjecture that much of quantum mechanics may be derived as a statistical formalism describing the dynamics of classical systems. Predictions of QFT result from combining quantum dynamics with quantum measurement rules. Bell's Theorem experiments which rule out "classical field theory" may therefore be interpreted as ruling out classical assumptions about measurement which were not part of the PDE. If quantum measurement rules can be derived as a consequence of quantum dynamics and gross thermodynamics, they should apply to a PDE model of reality just as much as they apply to a QFT model. This implies: (1) the real advantage of "quantum computing" lies in the exploitation of quantum measurement effects, which may have possibilities well beyond today's early efforts; (2) Lagrangian PDE models assuming the existence of objective reality should be reconsidered as a "theory of everything." This paper will review the underlying mathematics, prove the basic points, and suggest how a PDE-based approach might someday allow a finite, consistent unified field theory far simpler than superstring theory, the only known alternative to date.

[1]  S. Coleman Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model , 1975 .

[2]  S. Mandelstam,et al.  Soliton Operators for the Quantized Sine-Gordon Equation , 1975 .

[3]  P. Werbos Bell’s Theorem: The Forgotten Loophole and How to Exploit It , 1989 .

[4]  Leon O. Chua,et al.  IMPLEMENTING BACK-PROPAGATION- THROUGH-TIME LEARNING ALGORITHM USING CELLULAR NEURAL NETWORKS , 1999 .

[5]  L. Infeld Quantum Theory of Fields , 1949, Nature.

[6]  Chia-Hsiung Tze,et al.  Solitons in nuclear and elementary particle physics , 1985 .

[7]  E. Knill,et al.  EFFECTIVE PURE STATES FOR BULK QUANTUM COMPUTATION , 1997, quant-ph/9706053.

[8]  R. J. Crewther,et al.  Introduction to quantum field theory , 1995, hep-th/9505152.

[9]  B. Hiley The Undivided Universe , 1993 .

[10]  S. R. Skinner,et al.  A Quantum Neural Network Computes Entanglement , 2002 .

[11]  E. Witten Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions , 1984 .

[12]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[13]  Ilya Prigogine Mind and Matter: Beyond the Cartesian Dualism , 2018, Origins.

[14]  Tosio Kato Perturbation theory for linear operators , 1966 .

[15]  F. Dyson The S Matrix in Quantum Electrodynamics , 1949 .

[16]  P. Werbos Chaotic solitons and the foundations of physics: a potential revolution , 1993 .

[17]  M. Kafatos Bell's theorem, quantum theory and conceptions of the universe , 1989 .

[18]  N. Gershenfeld,et al.  Bulk Spin-Resonance Quantum Computation , 1997, Science.

[19]  P. J. Werbos,et al.  An approach to the realistic explanation of quantum mechanics , 1973 .

[20]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  The Backwards-Time Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics - Revisited With Experiment , 2000 .