The Game Between Game Theory and Gaming Simulations: Design Choices

Background. The abstraction of complex systems, which is required by default when modelling gaming simulations, is a convoluted and time-consuming process. For gaming simulations to be efficient and effective, the problem of the real system they imitate needs to be narrowed down and simplified as much as possible. Additionally, even after abstraction of the real system, multiple design decisions need to be made and these may differ depending on the gaming simulation. Aim. This article proposes a framework for formalizing, and consequently standardizing, expediting and simplifying, the modelling of gaming simulations. Method. The proposed framework applies game concepts pertaining to game theory in the abstraction of the real system and the game design decisions. Results. Application of the framework in three case studies reveals several advantages of incorporating game theory into game design, such as formally defining the game design elements and identifying the worst-case scenarios in the real-systems, to name but two. Conclusions. Given the framework’s advantages in general, and the game design recommendations it offers in particular, it is safe to conclude that, for the cases presented in this article, the framework make positive contributions towards the development of gaming simulations.

[1]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in Networks: Public Private Controversies , 2004 .

[2]  J K Goeree,et al.  Stochastic game theory: for playing games, not just for doing theory. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Jason Brownlee,et al.  Complex adaptive systems , 2007 .

[4]  Gary E. Bolton Game theory's role in role-playing , 2002 .

[5]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[6]  Scott L. Feld,et al.  Simulation Games in Theory Development , 1997 .

[7]  Richard D. Duke,et al.  Gaming: The Future's Language , 2014 .

[8]  David R. Michael,et al.  Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform , 2005 .

[9]  Sebastiaan Meijer,et al.  Collaboration patterns in the Dutch railway sector: Using game concepts to compare different outcomes in a unique development case , 2018, Research in Transportation Economics.

[10]  Sebastiaan Meijer,et al.  Selecting the Right Game Concept for Social Simulation of Real-World Systems , 2020 .

[11]  D. Helbing A Mathematical Model for the Behavior of Individuals in a Social Field , 1994, cond-mat/9805194.

[12]  Hendrik Vollmer What kind of game is everyday interaction? , 2013 .

[13]  Scott Moss,et al.  Game Theory: Limitations and an Alternative , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[14]  Emmanuel Guardiola Ubisoft GAME THEORY AND VIDEO GAME , A NEW APPROACH OF GAME THEORY TO ANALYZE AND CONCEIVE GAME SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[15]  Sebastiaan Meijer,et al.  Gaming Simulations for Railways: Lessons Learned from Modeling Six Games for the Dutch Infrastructure Management , 2012 .

[16]  Stéphane Natkin,et al.  How to Analyse Therapeutic Games: The Player / Game / Therapy Model , 2012, ICEC.

[17]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  Computers play the beer game: can artificial agents manage supply chains? , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Tom Apperley Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres , 2006 .

[19]  Michael Zyda,et al.  From visual simulation to virtual reality to games , 2005, Computer.

[20]  Casper Harteveld,et al.  Triadic Game Design - Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play , 2011 .

[21]  Ye Ye,et al.  Multi-objective optimization design methods based on game theory , 2010, 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[22]  Daniël Wedema Games And Information An Introduction To Game Theory 3rd Edition , 2011 .

[23]  Abbas Afshar,et al.  Simulation-optimization model for non-point source pollution management in watersheds: Application of cooperative game theory , 2013 .

[24]  Olivier Barreteau,et al.  Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: An introduction , 2007 .

[25]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  From social simulation to integrative system design , 2010, ArXiv.

[26]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[27]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Complexity Theory and Public Management , 2008 .

[28]  Sebastiaan Meijer,et al.  Deciding on Innovation at a Railway Network Operator: A Grounded Theory Approach , 2012 .

[29]  F. Restle Beyond game theory. , 1963 .

[30]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Management in Networks: On multi-actor decision making , 2008 .

[31]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Why game theory "doesn't work" , 1987 .

[32]  Bill Roungas,et al.  A Model-driven Framework for Educational Game Design , 2015, Int. J. Serious Games.

[33]  Jonathan H. Klein Analysing Conflict and its Resolution - Some Mathematical Contributions , 1987 .

[34]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Game theory - Analysis of Conflict , 1991 .

[35]  Julia C. Lo,et al.  Using gaming simulation experiments to test railway innovations: Implications for validity , 2013, 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC).

[36]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  On the Architecture of Game Science , 2018 .

[37]  Kimberly M. Thompson,et al.  Valuing Information in Complex Systems: An Integrated Analytical Approach to Achieve Optimal Performance in the Beer Distribution Game , 2015, IEEE Access.

[38]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[39]  Scott W. Cunningham,et al.  Structuring the multi-issue and hub-spoke games found in public administration , 2016, 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).

[40]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Serious games : mechanisms and effects , 2009 .

[41]  Tracy Fullerton,et al.  Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games, Third Edition , 2014 .

[42]  Stephen M. Alessi,et al.  Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations , 1988 .