Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Tobias Siebenlist,et al. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[2] Vincent Larivière,et al. Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? , 2014, it Inf. Technol..
[3] Q. Vuong. Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .
[4] J. Hemphill,et al. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. , 2003, The American psychologist.
[5] Liz Allen,et al. Tracking the impact of research on policy and practice: investigating the feasibility of using citations in clinical guidelines for research evaluation , 2012, BMJ Open.
[6] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[7] D. Wardle. Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? , 2010 .
[8] Mike Thelwall,et al. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? , 2014, Scientometrics.
[9] Jenny Fry,et al. Measuring researchers’ use of scholarly information through social bookmarking data: A case study of BibSonomy , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..
[10] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact , 2012, ArXiv.
[11] Mike Thelwall,et al. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[12] Massimo Franceschet,et al. The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[13] Mark E. J. Newman,et al. Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..
[14] S. S. Wilks. The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .
[15] Ehsan Mohammadi,et al. Identifying the invisible impact of scholarly publications : a multi-disciplinary analysis using 'altmetrics' , 2015 .
[16] M. Thelwall,et al. F 1000 , Mendeley and Traditional Bibliometric Indicators , 2012 .
[17] Johan Bollen,et al. How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations , 2012, PloS one.
[18] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[19] Mike Thelwall,et al. Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[20] Daryl E. Chubin,et al. Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .
[21] Debora Shaw,et al. Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Rodrigo Costas,et al. How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications , 2014, Scientometrics.
[23] Stefanie Haustein,et al. Exploring data quality and retrieval strategies for mendeley reader counts , 2015 .
[24] Mike Thelwall,et al. Tweeting Links to Academic Articles , 2013 .
[25] David M. Pennock,et al. Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the web , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Mike Thelwall,et al. Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? An analysis of mendeley readers , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[27] Mike Thelwall,et al. Evaluating altmetrics , 2013, Scientometrics.
[28] Mike Thelwall,et al. When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[29] M. Thelwall,et al. Policy-relevant Webometrics for individual scientific fields , 2010 .
[30] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels , 2013, Scientometrics.
[31] Gunther Eysenbach,et al. Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.
[32] Paul Wilson,et al. The misuse of the Vuong test for non-nested models to test for zero-inflation , 2015 .
[33] Michael H. MacRoberts,et al. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.
[34] Lada A. Adamic,et al. Power-Law Distribution of the World Wide Web , 2000, Science.
[35] Heather A. Piwowar,et al. The power of altmetrics on a CV , 2013 .
[36] Richard E. West,et al. Mendeley: Creating Communities of Scholarly Inquiry Through Research Collaboration , 2011 .
[37] Mike Thelwall,et al. Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[38] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.
[39] G. Lewison. Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact , 1998, Gut.
[40] Mike Thelwall,et al. Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[41] Mike Thelwall,et al. Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[42] Norman Kaplan,et al. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .
[43] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century , 2012 .
[44] Euan A. Adie,et al. Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics , 2013, Learn. Publ..
[45] Jacob Cohen,et al. A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.
[46] Vincent Larivière,et al. Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[47] P. Seglen,et al. Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.
[48] M. Thelwall,et al. Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information , 2012, PloS one.
[49] Per O. Seglen,et al. The Skewness of Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[50] Stefanie N. Lindstaedt,et al. Visualization of Co-Readership Patterns from an Online Reference Management System , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[51] Rodrigo Costas,et al. What is the impact of the publications read by the different Mendeley users? Could they help to identify alternative types of impact? PLoS ALM Workshop, San Francisco , 2013 .
[52] H. Moed. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) , 2005 .
[53] R. Topel,et al. Diminishing Returns?: The Costs and Benefits of Improving Health , 2003 .
[54] Mike Thelwall,et al. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement , 2011, Scientometrics.
[55] Mike Thelwall,et al. Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[56] Victor Henning,et al. Mendeley - A Last.fm For Research? , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.
[57] Tamara Heck,et al. Testing Collaborative Filtering against Co-Citation Analysis and Bibliographic Coupling for Academic Author Recommendation , 2011 .
[58] Henk F. Moed,et al. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .
[59] Ludo Waltman,et al. F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..