Influence of Connectives on Language Comprehension: Eye tracking Evidence for Incremental Interpretation

An eye-tracking experiment investigated whether incremental interpretation applies to interclausal relationships. According to Millis and Just's (1994) delayed-integration hypothesis, interclausal relationships are not computed until the end of the second clause, because the processor needs to have two full propositions before integration can occur. We investigated the processing of causal and diagnostic sentences (Sweetser, 1990; Tversky & Kahneman, 1982) that contained the connective because. Previous research (Traxler, Sanford, Aked, & Moxey, 1997) has demonstrated that readers have greater difficulty processing diagnostic sentences than causal sentences. Our results indicated that difficulty processing diagnostic sentences occurred well before the end of the second clause. Thus comprehenders appear to compute interclausal relationships incrementally.

[1]  WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al.  Linguistic Structure and Speech Shadowing at Very Short Latencies , 1973, Nature.

[2]  W D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process , 1975, Science.

[3]  D. Aaronson,et al.  Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. , 1976 .

[4]  D. Swinney,et al.  Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension. , 1976 .

[5]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing , 1977 .

[6]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[7]  Nancy Marshall,et al.  Comprehension of connected discourse: a study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled* , 1978 .

[8]  D. Mitchell,et al.  The Effects of Context and Content on Immediate Processing in Reading , 1978 .

[9]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[10]  I. Fischler,et al.  Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .

[11]  B. Meyer.  Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[12]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[13]  Don C. Mitchell,et al.  The Scheduling of Text Integration Processes in Reading , 1981 .

[14]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The resolution of discourse anaphors: Some on-line studies , 1982 .

[15]  K. Haberlandt.  Reader Expectations in Text Comprehension , 1982 .

[16]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Effects of Text Structure on Use of Cognitive Capacity during Reading. , 1982 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[19]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  The On-Line Resolution of Pronominal Anaphora , 1982 .

[20]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. , 1983 .

[22]  Nancy Lockitch Loman,et al.  SIGNALING TECHNIQUES THAT INCREASE THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF EXPOSITORY PROSE , 1983 .

[23]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[24]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[25]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  15 – Eye Movements in Pronoun Assignment: A Study of Sentence Integration1 , 1983 .

[26]  Esther Geva,et al.  Use of Conjunctions in Expository Texts by Skilled and Less Skilled Readers , 1985 .

[27]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguity , 1985 .

[28]  R. Kreuz,et al.  Context can constrain lexical access: implications for models of language comprehension , 1986 .

[29]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[30]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[31]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Anaphoric inference during reading. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[33]  G Underwood,et al.  Information Influences the Pattern of Eye Fixations during Sentence Comprehension , 1988, Perception.

[34]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[35]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[36]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse , 1988 .

[37]  Manfred Thüring,et al.  Conjunctions and the recall of composite sentences , 1988 .

[38]  L. Stowe.  Thematic Structures and Sentence Comprehension , 1989 .

[39]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[40]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes , 1989 .

[42]  M. Gernsbacher.  Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[43]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Lexical Expectations in Parsing Complement-Verb Sentences , 1989 .

[44]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns , 1990 .

[45]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .

[46]  J. Henderson,et al.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[48]  E. M. Segal,et al.  The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults' interpretations of simple stories , 1991 .

[49]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility. , 1991 .

[50]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: evidence against semantic preprocessing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits , 1992 .

[52]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: a comparative study of native-english and english-as-a-second-language speakers , 1992 .

[53]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations , 1992 .

[54]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts , 1992 .

[55]  A. Garnham,et al.  Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .

[56]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrative Processes in Utterance Resolution , 1993 .

[57]  C. Clifton,et al.  Thematic roles in sentence parsing. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[58]  A. Graesser,et al.  The impact of connectives on the memory for expository texts , 1993 .

[59]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .

[60]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[61]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Direct association and sentence processing: A reply to gorrell and to Gibson and Hickok , 1993 .

[62]  S. Garrod,et al.  Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. , 1994 .

[63]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .

[64]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Processing local and unbounded dependencies: A unified account , 1994 .

[65]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[66]  A. Knott,et al.  Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a Set of Coherence Relations. , 1994 .

[67]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases , 1994 .

[68]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  The Influence of Connectives on Sentence Comprehension , 1994 .

[69]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. , 1995 .

[70]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .

[71]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .

[72]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Modifier Attachment in Sentence Parsing: Evidence from Dutch , 1996 .

[73]  A. Sanford,et al.  Processing causal and diagnostic statements in discourse , 1997 .