introduction: placing Touch within Social Theory and empirical Study

[About the book] Given that touch and touching is so central to everyday embodied existence, why has it been largely ignored by social scientists for so long? What is the place of touch in our mixed spaces of sociality, work, domesticity, recreation, creativity or care? What conceptual resources and academic languages can we reach towards when approaching tactile activities and somatic experiences through the body? How is this tactile landscape gendered? How is touch becoming revisited and revalidated in late capitalism through animal encounters, tourism, massage, beauty treatments, professional medicine, everyday spiritualities or the aseptic touch-free spaces of automated toilets? How is touch placed and valued within scholarly fieldwork and research itself, integral as it is to the production of embodied epistemologies? How is touch involved in such aesthetic experiences as shaping objects in sand, or encountering fleshly bodies within a painting? The goal of this edited collection, Touching Space, Placing Touch is twofold: • To further advance theoretical and empirical understanding of touch in social science scholarship by focussing on the differential social and cultural meanings of touching and the places of touch. • To develop a multi-faceted and interdisciplinary explanations of touch in terms of individual and social life, personal experiences and tasks, and their related cultural contexts. The twelve essays in this volume provide a rich combination of theoretical resources, methodological approaches and empirical investigation. Each chapter takes a distinct aspect of touch within a particular spatial context, exploring this through a mixture of sustained empirical work, critical theories of embodiment, philosophical and psychoanalytic approaches to gendered touch and touching, or the relationship between visual and non-visual culture, to articulate something of the variety and variability of touching experiences. The contributors are a mixture of established and emerging researchers within a growing interdisciplinary field of scholarship, yet the volume has a strong thematic identity and therefore represents the formative collection concerning the multiple senses of touch within social science scholarship at this time.

[1]  M. Douglas,et al.  Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. , 1967 .

[2]  M. Douglas,et al.  Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. , 1967 .

[3]  D. Mccormack.  Geographies for Moving Bodies: Thinking, Dancing, Spaces , 2008 .

[4]  Margaret Wickens Pearce,et al.  Framing the Days: Place and Narrative in Cartography , 2008 .

[5]  Stephen John Saville.  Playing with fear: parkour and the mobility of emotion , 2008 .

[6]  Amanda Bingley,et al.  In here and out there: Sensations between Self and landscape , 2003 .

[7]  W. Bunge,et al.  Fitzgerald: Geography of a Revolution , 1971 .

[8]  L. Law.  Home Cooking: Filipino Women and Geographies of the Senses in Hong Kong , 2001 .

[9]  D. Dixon,et al.  Geographies of Touch/Touched by Geography , 2010 .

[10]  Allison Hayes-Conroy,et al.  Visceral Geographies: Mattering, Relating, and Defying , 2010 .

[11]  Jennifer L. Johnson.  Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. Nigel J. Thrift, London: Routledge (2008), $54.95, ISBN: 978-0-415-39321-8 , 2011 .

[12]  Terry Nardin,et al.  Augustine of Hippo , 1969 .

[13]  John Wylie.  An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor , 2002 .

[14]  Mark Paterson,et al.  Haptic geographies: ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions , 2009 .

[15]  H. Hawkins.  Dialogues and Doings: Sketching the Relationships Between Geography and Art , 2011 .

[16]  Tim Edensor,et al.  Sensing the Ruin , 2007 .

[17]  M. Serres.  The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies , 2009 .

[18]  J. Crary.  Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the 19th Century , 1990 .

[19]  Laura U. Marks.  Touch: Sensuous Theory And Multisensory Media , 2002 .

[20]  J. Crary,et al.  Suspensions of Perception , 1999 .

[21]  Hester Parr,et al.  Mind and Body Spaces : Geographies of Illness, Impairment and Disability , 2001 .

[22]  Charles Hirschkind.  Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory , 2005 .

[23]  M. Paterson.  More-than visual approaches to architecture. Vision, touch, technique , 2011 .

[24]  Constance Classen,et al.  The Book of Touch , 2005 .

[25]  A. Latham.  Research, Performance, and Doing Human Geography: Some Reflections on the Diary-Photograph, Diary-Interview Method , 2003 .

[26]  Paul W. Rodaway.  Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense and Place , 1994 .

[27]  J. Locke.  An Essay concerning Human Understanding , 1924, Nature.

[28]  N. K. Hayles.  Corporeal Anxiety in Dictionary of the Khazars: What Books Talk About in the Late Age of Print When They Talk About Losing Their Bodies , 1997 .

[29]  Elsie Ho,et al.  Using 'the body' as an 'instrument of research': kimch'i and pavlova , 2008 .

[30]  S. Danius,et al.  The Senses of Modernism: Technology, Perception, and Aesthetics , 2002 .

[31]  A. Sparkes.  Ethnography and the senses: challenges and possibilities , 2009 .

[32]  N. Thrift.  Non-representational theory , 2007 .

[33]  M. Crang.  Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see? , 2003 .

[34]  G. Rose.  On the Need to Ask How, Exactly, Is Geography “Visual”? , 2003 .

[35]  Cristina Chimisso,et al.  The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies , 2010 .

[36]  L. Irigaray,et al.  An Ethics of Sexual Difference , 1993 .

[37]  S. Hinchliffe,et al.  Where Species Meet , 2007 .

[38]  Caroline A. Jones,et al.  Sensorium : Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art , 2006 .

[39]  Justin Spinney,et al.  A Place of Sense: A Kinaesthetic Ethnography of Cyclists on Mont Ventoux , 2006 .

[40]  R. Golledge.  Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations , 1993 .

[41]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[42]  D. Winnicott.  Playing and Reality , 1971 .

[43]  Lisa Parks,et al.  journal of visual culture , 2007 .

[44]  J. Hockey.  Sensing the Run: The Senses and Distance Running , 2006 .

[45]  Martin Jay,et al.  Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought , 1993 .

[46]  D. Howes,et al.  Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory , 2003 .

[47]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty.  Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[48]  Mark Paterson,et al.  The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies , 2007 .

[49]  Elsie Ho,et al.  A visceral approach: cooking ‘at home’ with migrant women in Hamilton, New Zealand , 2009 .

[50]  C. Woolgar.  A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace , 2006 .

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.