Global motions exhibited by proteins in micro- to milliseconds simulations concur with anisotropic network model predictions.

The Anton supercomputing technology recently developed for efficient molecular dynamics simulations permits us to examine micro- to milli-second events at full atomic resolution for proteins in explicit water and lipid bilayer. It also permits us to investigate to what extent the collective motions predicted by network models (that have found broad use in molecular biophysics) agree with those exhibited by full-atomic long simulations. The present study focuses on Anton trajectories generated for two systems: the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, and an archaeal aspartate transporter, GltPh. The former, a thoroughly studied system, helps benchmark the method of comparative analysis, and the latter provides new insights into the mechanism of function of glutamate transporters. The principal modes of motion derived from both simulations closely overlap with those predicted for each system by the anisotropic network model (ANM). Notably, the ANM modes define the collective mechanisms, or the pathways on conformational energy landscape, that underlie the passage between the crystal structure and substates visited in simulations. In particular, the lowest frequency ANM modes facilitate the conversion between the most probable substates, lending support to the view that easy access to functional substates is a robust determinant of evolutionarily selected native contact topology.

[1]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  NMR investigations of the dynamics of the aromatic amino acid residues in the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor , 1975, FEBS letters.

[2]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[3]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Molecular dynamics of hydrogen bonds in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor protein , 1981, Nature.

[4]  M Karplus,et al.  Time dependence of atomic fluctuations in proteins: analysis of local and collective motions in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1982, Biochemistry.

[5]  M. Karplus,et al.  Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  N. Go,et al.  Dynamics of a small globular protein in terms of low-frequency vibrational modes. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Robert Huber,et al.  Structure of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor , 1984 .

[8]  M. Karplus,et al.  Active site dynamics in protein molecules: A stochastic boundary molecular‐dynamics approach , 1985, Biopolymers.

[9]  M. Levitt,et al.  Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  N Go,et al.  Normal modes of vibration in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and its mechanical property , 1987, Proteins.

[11]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Reinvestigation of the aromatic side-chains in the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor by heteronuclear two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  R. Sharon,et al.  Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S Cusack,et al.  Inelastic neutron scattering analysis of picosecond internal protein dynamics. Comparison of harmonic theory with experiment. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  S. Amara A tale of two families , 1992, Nature.

[15]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  Dynamical properties of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor from a molecular dynamics simulation at 5000 atm , 1993, FEBS letters.

[16]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[17]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Disulfide bond isomerization in BPTI and BPTI(G36S): an NMR study of correlated mobility in proteins. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[18]  A Kitao,et al.  Harmonic and anharmonic aspects in the dynamics of BPTI: A normal mode analysis and principal component analysis , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  D. Peter Tieleman,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides from BPTI: A closer look at amide—aromatic interactions , 1996, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[20]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[21]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[22]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  E. Gouaux,et al.  Structure of a glutamate transporter homologue from Pyrococcus horikoshii , 2004, Nature.

[25]  I. Bahar,et al.  Normal mode analysis : theory and applications to biological and chemical systems , 2005 .

[26]  I. Bahar,et al.  Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  M. Bellissent-Funel,et al.  Influence of pressure on structure and dynamics of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI): small angle and quasi-elastic neutron scattering studies. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  S. Amara,et al.  Structural Rearrangements at the Translocation Pore of the Human Glutamate Transporter, EAAT1* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[30]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Binding induced conformational changes of proteins correlate with their intrinsic fluctuations: a case study of antibodies , 2007, BMC Structural Biology.

[31]  Alan Grossfield,et al.  Convergence of molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins , 2007, Proteins.

[32]  Eric Gouaux,et al.  Coupling substrate and ion binding to extracellular gate of a sodium-dependent aspartate transporter , 2007, Nature.

[33]  S. Amara,et al.  Glutamate and monoamine transporters: new visions of form and function , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  E. Tajkhorshid,et al.  Dynamics of the extracellular gate and ion-substrate coupling in the glutamate transporter. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[35]  A. Carriquiry,et al.  Close correspondence between the motions from principal component analysis of multiple HIV-1 protease structures and elastic network modes. , 2008, Structure.

[36]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[37]  K. Schulten,et al.  Mechanism of signal propagation upon retinal isomerization: insights from molecular dynamics simulations of rhodopsin restrained by normal modes. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Time-resolved Mechanism of Extracellular Gate Opening and Substrate Binding in a Glutamate Transporter*S⃞ , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  R. Dror,et al.  Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  David E. Shaw,et al.  Elucidating membrane protein function through long-timescale molecular dynamics simulation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[41]  N. Reyes,et al.  Transport mechanism of a bacterial homologue of glutamate transporters , 2009, Nature.

[42]  Zheng Yang,et al.  Allosteric Transitions of Supramolecular Systems Explored by Network Models: Application to Chaperonin GroEL , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  I. Bahar,et al.  The intrinsic dynamics of enzymes plays a dominant role in determining the structural changes induced upon inhibitor binding , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  I. Bahar,et al.  Molecular simulations elucidate the substrate translocation pathway in a glutamate transporter , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Joseph A. Bank,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S10 Table S1 References Movies S1 to S3 Atomic-level Characterization of the Structural Dynamics of Proteins , 2022 .

[46]  I. Bahar,et al.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[47]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Sodium-coupled Secondary Transporters: Insights from Structure-based Computations , 2011 .

[48]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Large collective motions regulate the functional properties of glutamate transporter trimers , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Tod D Romo,et al.  Validating and improving elastic network models with molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proteins.

[50]  I. Bahar,et al.  The mechanism of substrate release by the aspartate transporter GltPh: insights from simulations. , 2011, Molecular bioSystems.

[51]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Development of the CHARMM Force Field for Lipids. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[52]  O. Boudker,et al.  Crystal structure of an asymmetric trimer of a bacterial glutamate transporter homolog , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[53]  Combining Optimal Control Theory and Molecular Dynamics for Protein Folding , 2012, PloS one.

[54]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Constraints imposed by the membrane selectively guide the alternating access dynamics of the glutamate transporter GltPh. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[55]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Longer simulations sample larger subspaces of conformations while maintaining robust mechanisms of motion , 2012, Proteins.

[56]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Structural Intermediates in a Model of the Substrate Translocation Path of the Bacterial Glutamate Transporter Homologue GltPh , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[57]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Intracellular Gating in an Inward-facing State of Aspartate Transporter GltPh Is Regulated by the Movements of the Helical Hairpin HP2* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.