Pupil-linked arousal modulates behavior in rats performing a whisker deflection direction discrimination task.

Non-luminance-mediated changes in pupil size have been widely used to index arousal state. Recent animal studies have demonstrated correlations between behavioral state-related pupil dynamics and sensory processing. However, the relationship between pupil-linked arousal and behavior in animals performing perceptual tasks has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we trained head-fixed rats to discriminate between directions of whisker movements using a Go/No-Go discrimination paradigm while imaging their pupils. Reaction times in this discrimination task were significantly slower than in previously reported detection tasks with similar setup, suggesting that discrimination required an increased cognitive load. We found the pupils dilated for all trials following stimulus presentation. Interestingly, in correct rejection trials, where pupil dilations solely resulted from cognitive processing, dilations were larger for more difficult stimuli. Baseline pupil size before stimulus presentation strongly correlated with behavior, as perceptual sensitivity peaked at intermediate pupil baselines and reaction time was fastest at large baselines. We further explored these relationships by investigating to what extent pupil baseline was predictive of upcoming behavior and found that a Bayesian decoder had significantly greater-than-chance probability in correctly predicting behavioral outcomes. Moreover, the outcome of the previous trial showed a strong correlation with behavior on present trials. Animals were more liberal and faster in responding following hit trials, whereas perceptual sensitivity was greatest following correct rejection trials. Taken together, these results suggest a tight correlation between pupil dynamics, perceptual performance, and reaction time in behaving rats, all of which are modulated by fluctuating arousal state. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this study, we for the first time demonstrated that head-fixed rats were able to discriminate different directions of whisker movement. Interestingly, we found that the pupil dilated more when discriminating more difficult stimuli, a phenomenon reported in human subjects but not in animals. Baseline pupil size before stimulus presentation was found to strongly correlate with behavior, and a Bayesian decoder had significantly greater-than-chance probability in correctly predicting behavioral outcomes based on the baseline pupil size.

[1]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brain-wide activity , 2018, bioRxiv.

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A model of the go/no-go task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Biao Huang,et al.  System Identification , 2000, Control Theory for Physicists.

[4]  M. Brecht,et al.  Functional architecture of the mystacial vibrissae , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  Daniel C Millard,et al.  Detection of tactile inputs in the rat vibrissa pathway. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[7]  P. Golshani,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of brain-state-dependent gain modulation in visual cortex , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Romo,et al.  Timing and neural encoding of somatosensory parametric working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Luc Estebanez,et al.  Supra-barrel Distribution of Directional Tuning for Global Motion in the Mouse Somatosensory Cortex. , 2018, Cell reports.

[10]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  Robert C. Wilson,et al.  Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil–linked arousal systems , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Jacek Dmochowski,et al.  Correlation of neural activity with behavioral kinematics reveals distinct sensory encoding and evidence accumulation processes during active tactile sensing , 2018, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. Poulet,et al.  Internal brain state regulates membrane potential synchrony in barrel cortex of behaving mice , 2008, Nature.

[14]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[15]  Peter R Murphy,et al.  Pupil Diameter Tracks Lapses of Attention , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  D. Simons,et al.  High responsiveness and direction sensitivity of neurons in the rat thalamic reticular nucleus to vibrissa deflections. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  'Where' and 'what' in the whisker sensorimotor system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  Yang Liu,et al.  Dynamic Lateralization of Pupil Dilation Evoked by Locus Coeruleus Activation Results from Sympathetic, Not Parasympathetic, Contributions. , 2017, Cell reports.

[19]  Stephen V. David,et al.  Cortical Membrane Potential Signature of Optimal States for Sensory Signal Detection , 2015, Neuron.

[20]  Anne E. Urai,et al.  Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias , 2017, Nature Communications.

[21]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Activation of monkey locus coeruleus neurons varies with difficulty and performance in a target detection task. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  David J. Margolis,et al.  Pupil Dynamics Reflect Behavioral Choice and Learning in a Go/NoGo Tactile Decision-Making Task in Mice , 2016, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[23]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic arousal function in humans. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[24]  M. Stryker,et al.  Modulation of Visual Responses by Behavioral State in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[25]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. , 1993, Science.

[26]  D. Simons,et al.  Circuit dynamics and coding strategies in rodent somatosensory cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Maik C. Stüttgen,et al.  Psychophysical and neurometric detection performance under stimulus uncertainty , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Gold,et al.  Relationships between Pupil Diameter and Neuronal Activity in the Locus Coeruleus, Colliculi, and Cingulate Cortex , 2016, Neuron.

[29]  D. Simons,et al.  Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  K. Harris,et al.  Cortical state and attention , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  D. Contreras,et al.  Dynamics of excitation and inhibition underlying stimulus selectivity in rat somatosensory cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Garrett B Stanley,et al.  Adaptive shaping of cortical response selectivity in the vibrissa pathway. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Daniel N. Hill,et al.  Texture Coding in the Rat Whisker System: Slip-Stick Versus Differential Resonance , 2008, PLoS biology.

[34]  Charles Watson,et al.  Bregma, lambda and the interaural midpoint in stereotaxic surgery with rats of different sex, strain and weight , 1985, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[36]  Martin Vinck,et al.  Arousal and Locomotion Make Distinct Contributions to Cortical Activity Patterns and Visual Encoding , 2014, Neuron.

[37]  T. Knapen,et al.  Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  M. Deschenes,et al.  Angular Tuning Bias of Vibrissa-Responsive Cells in the Paralemniscal Pathway , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Your Eyes Give You Away: Prestimulus Changes in Pupil Diameter Correlate with Poststimulus Task-Related EEG Dynamics , 2014, PloS one.

[40]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Yang Jiang,et al.  The interaction of arousal and valence in affective priming: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2012, Brain Research.

[42]  Daniel C Millard,et al.  System identification of the nonlinear dynamics in the thalamocortical circuit in response to patterned thalamic microstimulation in vivo , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[43]  Michela Balconi,et al.  Bursts of transcranial electrical stimulation increase arousal in a continuous performance test , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  M. Andermann,et al.  A somatotopic map of vibrissa motion direction within a barrel column , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Harvey A Swadlow,et al.  Brain state and contrast sensitivity in the awake visual thalamus , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Representation of Stimulus Speed and Direction in Vibrissal-Sensitive Regions of the Trigeminal Nuclei: A Comparison of Single Unit and Population Responses , 2016, PloS one.

[47]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Tuning arousal with optogenetic modulation of locus coeruleus neurons , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  M. Laubach,et al.  Layer-Specific Somatosensory Cortical Activation During Active Tactile Discrimination , 2004, Science.

[49]  T. Gerdjikov,et al.  Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli in the Rat Whisker System: Behavior and Neurometrics , 2010, Neuron.

[50]  Jason Wolfe,et al.  Sparse temporal coding of elementary tactile features during active whisker sensation , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  M. Diamond,et al.  Behavioral study of whisker-mediated vibration sensation in rats , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  F. Holsboer,et al.  Effects of light or dark phase testing on behavioural and cognitive performance in DBA mice , 2006, Laboratory animals.

[53]  Garrett B. Stanley,et al.  The Adaptive Trade-Off between Detection and Discrimination in Cortical Representations and Behavior , 2014, Neuron.

[54]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Neural Activity in Barrel Cortex Underlying Vibrissa-Based Object Localization in Mice , 2010, Neuron.

[55]  David A McCormick,et al.  Brain state dependent activity in the cortex and thalamus , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[56]  John M. Pearson,et al.  Pupil size and social vigilance in rhesus macaques , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[57]  M. Andermann,et al.  Embodied Information Processing: Vibrissa Mechanics and Texture Features Shape Micromotions in Actively Sensing Rats , 2008, Neuron.

[58]  Anne E. Urai,et al.  Task-evoked pupil responses reflect internal belief states , 2018, bioRxiv.

[59]  D. McCormick,et al.  Pupil fluctuations track rapid changes in adrenergic and cholinergic activity in cortex , 2016, Nature Communications.

[60]  M. Vinck,et al.  Arousal and locomotion make distinct contributions to cortical activity patterns and visual encoding , 2014, bioRxiv.

[61]  George H. Denfield,et al.  Pupil Fluctuations Track Fast Switching of Cortical States during Quiet Wakefulness , 2014, Neuron.

[62]  C. Niell,et al.  Behavioral State—Getting “In The Zone” , 2015, Neuron.

[63]  C. Berridge,et al.  The locus coeruleus–noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[64]  Y. Dan,et al.  Neuromodulation of Brain States , 2012, Neuron.

[65]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[66]  Christof Koch,et al.  Activity in the Visual Cortex is Modulated by Top-Down Attention Locked to Reaction Time , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  S. Sara.  The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[68]  Niels A. Kloosterman,et al.  Dynamic modulation of decision biases by brainstem arousal systems , 2017, eLife.

[69]  Peter R Murphy,et al.  Global gain modulation generates time-dependent urgency during perceptual choice in humans , 2016, Nature Communications.

[70]  Rune W. Berg,et al.  Rhythmic whisking by rat: retraction as well as protraction of the vibrissae is under active muscular control. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[72]  Nathan G. Clack,et al.  Vibrissa-Based Object Localization in Head-Fixed Mice , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[74]  M. Diamond,et al.  Neuronal Activity in Rat Barrel Cortex Underlying Texture Discrimination , 2007, PLoS biology.

[75]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[76]  D. Simons,et al.  Responses of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons to movements of vibrissae in different directions. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[77]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Mechanical Characteristics of Rat Vibrissae: Resonant Frequencies and Damping in Isolated Whiskers and in the Awake Behaving Animal , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  S. Bouret,et al.  Noradrenaline and Dopamine Neurons in the Reward/Effort Trade-Off: A Direct Electrophysiological Comparison in Behaving Monkeys , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The effects of neural gain on attention and learning , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[80]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Waking State: Rapid Variations Modulate Neural and Behavioral Responses , 2015, Neuron.

[81]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Rats and Humans Can Optimally Accumulate Evidence for Decision-Making , 2013, Science.

[82]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Movement-related activity dominates cortex during sensory-guided decision making , 2018, bioRxiv.

[83]  Rasmus S Petersen,et al.  Transformation in the neural code for whisker deflection direction along the lemniscal pathway. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[84]  D. Simons,et al.  Angular tuning and velocity sensitivity in different neuron classes within layer 4 of rat barrel cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[85]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention , 2005, Neuron.

[86]  D. Tank,et al.  Cellular Resolution Functional Imaging in Behaving Rats Using Voluntary Head Restraint , 2013, Neuron.

[87]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements , 2019 .

[88]  D. Simons,et al.  Thalamocortical Angular Tuning Domains within Individual Barrels of Rat Somatosensory Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[89]  J. Waters,et al.  Neuromodulatory Correlates of Pupil Dilation , 2018, Front. Neural Circuits.

[90]  Maik C. Stüttgen,et al.  The Head-fixed Behaving Rat—Procedures and Pitfalls , 2010, Somatosensory & motor research.