How teachers become action researchers and how teacher educators become their facilitators

Abstract This article describes the design and findings of a case study involving seven groups of teachers at six schools for secondary education. The teachers tried to gain insight into their own practice and to improve their own practice by learning to do action research. They were facilitated by teacher educators over a period of 2 years. The research questions of this article are: (1) What patterns emerge in the way the teachers master action research? and (2) What patterns emerge in the way they are facilitated by the teacher educators? The theoretical framework of the study elaborates on the performance and facilitation of action research using the concept of ‘praxis’. The basic assumption is that teachers learn to do action research by communicating with others about the knowledge they have acquired through experience of action research and the tasks they have performed to develop that knowledge. The results show that what is difficult about learning to do action research is not so much the complexity of procedural and methodological aspects of action research itself, but the fact that teachers have to gradually master several skills and actions at the same time; skills and actions that they are not familiar with. Besides, the study found five developments in professional attitudes that teachers go through as they master action research. Facilitators are increasingly successful the more they offer on-going support on the spot to teachers as they carry out their action research. The study identified five aspects of successful facilitation.

[1]  L. Stenhouse An introduction to curriculum research and development , 1975 .

[2]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[3]  P. Ponte Action Research as a Further Education Strategy for School Counselling and Guidance. , 1995 .

[4]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  M. Eraut Developing professional knowledge and competence , 1994 .

[6]  K. B. Hafner,et al.  On assessing interrater agreement for multiple attribute responses. , 1989, Biometrics.

[7]  Peter N. Posch,et al.  Does the ‘Grounded Theory’ Approach offer a Guiding Paradigm for Teacher Research? , 1989 .

[8]  R. Winter Some Principles and Procedures for the Conduct of Action Research , 2003 .

[9]  S. Grundy Curriculum: Product Or Praxis? , 1987 .

[10]  John Elliott,et al.  Action research for educational change , 1991 .

[11]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Handbook of Research on Teaching , 2001 .

[12]  Bill Atweh,et al.  ACTION RESEARCH IN PRACTICE: Partnerships for Social Justice in Education , 1998 .

[13]  A. Parry Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[14]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[15]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[16]  Sandra Hollingsworth,et al.  International Action Research: A Casebook for Educational Reform , 1997 .

[17]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[18]  S. Johnston Is action research a ‘natural’ Process for teachers? , 1994 .

[19]  P. Munn Developing teachers: the challenges of lifelong learning , 2003 .

[20]  Jack Whitehead,et al.  Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind , 1989 .

[21]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .