Consistency of Standard Setting in an Augmented State Testing System

In this article we address the issue of consistency in standard setting in the context of an augmented state testing program. Information gained from the external NRT scores is used to help make an informed decision on the determination of cut scores on the state test. The consistency of cut scores on the CRT across grades is maintained by forcing a consistency model based on the NRT scores and translating that information back to the CRT scores. The inconsistency of standards and the application of this model are illustrated using data from the Maryland MSA large state testing program involving cut points for basic, proficient and advanced in mathematics and reading across years and across grades. The model is discussed in some detail and shown to be a promising approach, although not without assumptions that must be made and issues that might be raised.

[1]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us , 2000 .

[2]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[3]  Mitchell D. Chester Multiple Measures and High‐Stakes Decisions: A Framework for Combining Measures , 2005 .

[4]  Chad W. Buckendahl,et al.  A Case Study of Vertically Moderated Standard Setting for a State Science Assessment Program , 2005 .

[5]  W. D. Schafer A State Perspective on Multiple Measures in School Accountability , 2005 .

[6]  Dorinda J. Gallant,et al.  Consistency and Predictive Nature of Vertically Moderated Standards for South Carolina's 1999 Palmetto Achievement Challenge Tests of Language Arts and Mathematics , 2005 .

[7]  Gregory J. Cizek,et al.  Setting performance standards : concepts, methods, and perspectives , 2001 .

[8]  E. Baker Multiple Measures: Toward Tiered Systems , 2005 .

[9]  Huynh Huynh,et al.  Vertically Moderated Standards: Background, Assumptions, and Practices , 2005 .

[10]  Wendy M. Yen,et al.  Multiple Measures: Alternative Design and Analysis Models , 2005 .

[11]  Robert W. Lissitz,et al.  Vertical Equating for State Assessments: Issues and Solutions in Determination of Adequate Yearly Progress and School Accountability. , 2003 .

[12]  David W. Grissmer,et al.  Improving Student Achievement: What State NAEP Test Scores Tell Us , 2000 .

[13]  Daniel M. Lewis,et al.  Aligning Policy and Methodology to Achieve Consistent Across-Grade Performance Standards , 2005 .