Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients

The specificity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) as a marker of frontal lobe pathology remains controversial. One problem is the lack of a well established correspondence between WCST errors and specific cognitive or neural processes. The conventional scoring of non-perseverative WCST errors does not discriminate between errors related to the efficient test of hypotheses during set shifting ('efficient errors'), and random failures to maintain set ('random errors'). This inherent confusion in the non-perseverative error score probably minimizes the relative importance of random errors in frontal lobe pathology. In this study, we used a WCST version sensitive to differences between 'efficient' and random errors to examine set shifting deficits in patients with focal lesions to their lateral prefrontal cortex. As expected, patients showed abnormally high rates of perseverative errors. Interestingly, patients also showed enhanced rates of random errors suggesting constant shifts or fluctuations in their choice of sorting principle. These results suggest that more sensitive tests are needed to elucidate the association between a specific type of set shifting error and a particular type of frontal lobe pathology.

[1]  B. Milner.  Effects of Different Brain Lesions on Card Sorting: The Role of the Frontal Lobes , 1963 .

[2]  T. Robbins.  Dissociating executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  D. Stuss,et al.  The Frontal Lobes , 1986 .

[4]  T. Robbins,et al.  Contrasting mechanisms of impaired attentional set-shifting in patients with frontal lobe damage or Parkinson's disease. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  G. Micheletti.  The Prefrontal Cortex. Anatomy, Physiology and Neuropsychology of the Frontal Lobe, Fuster J.M.. Raven Press, New York (1989) , 1989 .

[6]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal cortical involvement in visual working memory. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  M. Farah,et al.  Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology , 1996 .

[8]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The domain of supervisory processes and the temporal organisation of behaviour , 1998 .

[9]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Bizarre Responses, Rule Detection and Frontal Lobe Lesions , 1996, Cortex.

[10]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[11]  M. Farah,et al.  A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: the role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  J. Fuster.  The Prefrontal Cortex , 1997 .

[13]  O. Spreen,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1991 .

[14]  J. Changeux,et al.  The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: theoretical analysis and modeling in a neuronal network. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test , 2022 .

[16]  J. Changeux,et al.  Neuronal Models of Prefrontal Cortical Functions , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Fuster.  Prefrontal Cortex , 2018 .

[18]  T Shallice,et al.  The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  H. Nelson.  A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[20]  H. Damasio,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. , 1991, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[21]  Francisco Barceló,et al.  Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b Response in the Wisconsin card sorting test , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  F. Rubia,et al.  The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the assessment of frontal function: A validation study with event-related potentials , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[24]  Daniel S. Levine,et al.  Modeling some effects of frontal lobe damage--Novelty and perseveration , 1989, Neural Networks.

[25]  M. Mountain,et al.  Wisconsin card sorting test as a measure of frontal pathology: A review , 1993 .

[26]  T. Robbins,et al.  Probabilistic learning and reversal deficits in patients with Parkinson’s disease or frontal or temporal lobe lesions: possible adverse effects of dopaminergic medication , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  F. Barceló.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Two Different Types of Error in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test , 2022 .

[28]  M. Lezak.  Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[29]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson's disease. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  Richard C. Bell,et al.  The Reliability and Internal Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test , 1998 .

[31]  T. Robbins,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions. , 1998 .

[32]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[33]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[34]  Dean C. Delis,et al.  Componential analysis of problem-solving ability: Performance of patients with frontal lobe damage and amnesic patients on a new sorting test , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Robert K. Heaton,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual – Revised and Expanded , 1993 .

[36]  R. Knight,et al.  Lateral prefrontal damage affects processing selection but not attention switching. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[37]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .