Spacer capture and integration by a type I-F Cas1–Cas2-3 CRISPR adaptation complex

Significance CRISPR-Cas systems provide prokaryotic adaptive immunity against invading genetic elements. For immunity, fragments of invader DNA are integrated into CRISPR arrays by Cas1 and Cas2 proteins. Type I-F systems contain a unique fusion of Cas2 to Cas3, the enzyme responsible for destruction of invading DNA. Structural, biophysical, and biochemical analyses of Cas1 and Cas2-3 from Pectobacterium atrosepticum demonstrated that they form a 400-kDa complex with a Cas14:Cas2-32 stoichiometry. Cas1–Cas2-3 binds, processes, and catalyzes the integration of DNA into CRISPR arrays independent of Cas3 activity. The arrangement of Cas3 in the complex, together with its redundant role in processing and integration, supports a scenario where Cas3 couples invader destruction with immunization—a process recently demonstrated in vivo. CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems capture DNA fragments from invading bacteriophages and plasmids and integrate them as spacers into bacterial CRISPR arrays. In type I-E and II-A CRISPR-Cas systems, this adaptation process is driven by Cas1–Cas2 complexes. Type I-F systems, however, contain a unique fusion of Cas2, with the type I effector helicase and nuclease for invader destruction, Cas3. By using biochemical, structural, and biophysical methods, we present a structural model of the 400-kDa Cas14–Cas2-32 complex from Pectobacterium atrosepticum with bound protospacer substrate DNA. Two Cas1 dimers assemble on a Cas2 domain dimeric core, which is flanked by two Cas3 domains forming a groove where the protospacer binds to Cas1–Cas2. We developed a sensitive in vitro assay and demonstrated that Cas1–Cas2-3 catalyzed spacer integration into CRISPR arrays. The integrase domain of Cas1 was necessary, whereas integration was independent of the helicase or nuclease activities of Cas3. Integration required at least partially duplex protospacers with free 3′-OH groups, and leader-proximal integration was stimulated by integration host factor. In a coupled capture and integration assay, Cas1–Cas2-3 processed and integrated protospacers independent of Cas3 activity. These results provide insight into the structure of protospacer-bound type I Cas1–Cas2-3 adaptation complexes and their integration mechanism.

[1]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  CRISPR-Cas: Adapting to change , 2017, Science.

[2]  K. Datsenko,et al.  Spacer-length DNA intermediates are associated with Cas1 in cells undergoing primed CRISPR adaptation , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Chris M. Brown,et al.  Interference-driven spacer acquisition is dominant over naive and primed adaptation in a native CRISPR–Cas system , 2016, Nature Communications.

[4]  J. Doudna,et al.  Protecting genome integrity during CRISPR immune adaptation , 2016, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  L. You,et al.  A CRISPR evolutionary arms race: structural insights into viral anti-CRISPR/Cas responses , 2016, Cell Research.

[6]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Cas3-Derived Target DNA Degradation Fragments Fuel Primed CRISPR Adaptation. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[7]  Yan Zhou,et al.  Structural basis of Cas3 inhibition by the bacteriophage protein AcrF3 , 2016, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[8]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems , 2016, Science.

[9]  K. Datsenko,et al.  Highly efficient primed spacer acquisition from targets destroyed by the Escherichia coli type I-E CRISPR-Cas interfering complex , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Lucas B. Harrington,et al.  CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[11]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Anti-cas spacers in orphan CRISPR4 arrays prevent uptake of active CRISPR–Cas I-F systems , 2016, Nature Microbiology.

[12]  Rebecca E. McKenzie,et al.  Structural plasticity and in vivo activity of Cas1 from the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system. , 2016, The Biochemical journal.

[13]  K. Dewar,et al.  Active and adaptive Legionella CRISPR‐Cas reveals a recurrent challenge to the pathogen , 2016, Cellular microbiology.

[14]  E. Charpentier,et al.  Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas Systems. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[15]  Rotem Sorek,et al.  CRISPR–Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[16]  K. Datsenko,et al.  Foreign DNA acquisition by the I-F CRISPR–Cas system requires all components of the interference machinery , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  E. Bolt,et al.  Different genome stability proteins underpin primed and naïve adaptation in E. coli CRISPR-Cas immunity , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Hongtu Zhao,et al.  Structural and Mechanistic Basis of PAM-Dependent Spacer Acquisition in CRISPR-Cas Systems , 2015, Cell.

[19]  J. Doudna,et al.  Surveillance and Processing of Foreign DNA by the Escherichia coli CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[20]  Sita J. Saunders,et al.  An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[21]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Foreign DNA capture during CRISPR–Cas adaptive immunity , 2015, Nature.

[22]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  Proteome-wide profiling of protein assemblies by cross-linking mass spectrometry , 2015, Nature Methods.

[23]  M. F. White,et al.  Intrinsic sequence specificity of the Cas1 integrase directs new spacer acquisition , 2015, eLife.

[24]  Asaf Levy,et al.  CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA , 2015, Nature.

[25]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Integrase-mediated spacer acquisition during CRISPR–Cas adaptive immunity , 2015, Nature.

[26]  S. Mulepati,et al.  Crystal structure of a CRISPR RNA–guided surveillance complex bound to a ssDNA target , 2014, Science.

[27]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Crystal structure of the CRISPR RNA–guided surveillance complex from Escherichia coli , 2014, Science.

[28]  Matthew J. Rames,et al.  Optimized Negative Staining: a High-throughput Protocol for Examining Small and Asymmetric Protein Structure by Electron Microscopy , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[29]  Rongguang Zhang,et al.  Structures of CRISPR Cas3 offer mechanistic insights into Cascade-activated DNA unwinding and degradation , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[30]  Peter C. Fineran,et al.  Priming in the Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system triggers strand-independent spacer acquisition, bi-directionally from the primed protospacer , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Cas1–Cas2 complex formation mediates spacer acquisition during CRISPR–Cas adaptive immunity , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[32]  Marco Biasini,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Rodolphe Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems: Prokaryotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[34]  Jos Boekhorst,et al.  Degenerate target sites mediate rapid primed CRISPR adaptation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  B. Wiedenheft,et al.  Fitting CRISPR-associated Cas3 into the helicase family tree. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  H. Xiang,et al.  Adaptation of the Haloarcula hispanica CRISPR-Cas system to a purified virus strictly requires a priming process , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  Peter C. Fineran,et al.  In Vivo Protein Interactions and Complex Formation in the Pectobacterium atrosepticum Subtype I-F CRISPR/Cas System , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[39]  Albert J R Heck,et al.  High-sensitivity Orbitrap mass analysis of intact macromolecular assemblies , 2012, Nature Methods.

[40]  M. DeLisa,et al.  Double-stranded Endonuclease Activity in Bacillus halodurans Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-associated Cas2 Protein* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[42]  U. Qimron,et al.  Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system , 2012, Nature Communications.

[44]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[45]  Peter C. Fineran,et al.  Csy4 is responsible for CRISPR RNA processing in Pectobacterium atrosepticum , 2011, RNA biology.

[46]  M. Selbach,et al.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control , 2011, Nature.

[47]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  Cas3 is a single‐stranded DNA nuclease and ATP‐dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[48]  George A. O'Toole,et al.  Non-Identity-Mediated CRISPR-Bacteriophage Interaction Mediated via the Csy and Cas3 Proteins , 2011, Journal of bacteriology.

[49]  Arlo Z. Randall,et al.  Development of a Novel Cross-linking Strategy for Fast and Accurate Identification of Cross-linked Peptides of Protein Complexes* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[50]  K. Zhou,et al.  Structural basis for DNase activity of a conserved protein implicated in CRISPR-mediated genome defense. , 2009, Structure.

[51]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. , 2009, Microbiology.

[52]  R. Terns,et al.  Prokaryotic silencing (psi)RNAs in Pyrococcus furiosus. , 2008, RNA.

[53]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[54]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes , 2008, Science.

[55]  E. Koonin,et al.  A Novel Family of Sequence-specific Endoribonucleases Associated with the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes , 2007, Science.

[57]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[58]  N. Grigorieff,et al.  Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[59]  W. Delano.  The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[60]  P. Schuck,et al.  Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[61]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[62]  D. Mastronarde.  Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.