Progress in the Use of Non-Linear Two-Equation Models in the Computation of Convective Heat-Transfer in Impinging and Separated Flows

The paper considers the application of the Craft et al. [6]non-linear eddy-viscosity model to separating and impinging flows. The original formulation was found to lead to numerical instabilities when applied to flow separating from a sharp corner. An alternative formulation for the variation of the turbulent viscosity parametercμ with strain rate is proposed which, together with a proposed improvement in the implementation of the non-linear model, removes this weakness. It does, however, lead to worse predictions in an impinging jet, and a further modification in the expression for cμ is proposed, which both retains the stability enhancements and improves the prediction of the stagnating flow. The Yap [24] algebraic length-scale correction term, included in the original model, is replaced with a differential form, developed from that proposed by Iacovides and Raisee [10]. This removes the need to prescribe the wall-distance, and is shown to lead to superior heat-transfer predictions in both an abrupt pipe flow and the axisymmetric impinging jet. One predictive weakness still, however, remains. The proposed model, in common with other near-wall models tested for the abrupt pipe expansion, returns a stronger dependence of Nusselt number on the Reynolds number than that indicated by the experimental data.

[1]  Ronald S. Rivlin,et al.  The Relation between the Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids and Turbulent Newtonian Fluids , 1957 .

[2]  M. Wolfshtein The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient , 1969 .

[3]  John L. Lumley,et al.  Toward a turbulent constitutive relation , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[5]  S. Pope A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Akira Yoshizawa,et al.  Turbulent channel and Couette flows using an anisotropic k-epsilon model , 1987 .

[7]  C. Yap Turbulent heat and momentum transfer in recirculating and impinging flows , 1987 .

[8]  Nobuhide Kasagi,et al.  Prediction of Anisotropy of the Near-Wall Turbulence With an Anisotropic Low-Reynolds-Number k–ε Turbulence Model , 1990 .

[9]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation , 1990 .

[10]  P. Durbin Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without “damping functions” , 1991, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[11]  T. Gatski,et al.  On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Dennis Cooper,et al.  Impinging jet studies for turbulence model assessment—I. Flow-field experiments , 1993 .

[13]  J. Lumley,et al.  A Realizable Reynolds Stress Algebraic Equation Model , 1993 .

[14]  Tim Craft,et al.  Impinging jet studies for turbulence model assessment—II. An examination of the performance of four turbulence models , 1993 .

[15]  B. Launder,et al.  Development and application of a cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence , 1996 .

[16]  P. Durbin On the k-3 stagnation point anomaly , 1996 .

[17]  M. R. Dehkordi Computation of flow and heat transfer through two- and three-dimensional rib-roughened passages , 1999 .

[18]  M. Raisee,et al.  Recent progress in the computation of flow and heat transfer in internal cooling passages of turbine blades , 1999 .