Practising the scenario-axes technique

Abstract Studying the future seems a mission impossible, since both the appearance of the future and its underlying dynamics are unknown and unknowable. Nevertheless, the future is being studied by professional futurists. So, professional futurists seem to have found ways to structure ‘the unknown’. The question is, then, how do they do this? Over the years, professional futurists have developed several types of techniques and methods to structure thinking and discussing the future. The scenario-axes technique, which aims to align divergent perspectives on how the future may unfold, is one such structuring device. In the past 2 years, we did ethnographic research at the Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research (RPB) and followed professional futurists constructing and applying scenario axes in their scenario projects. Our observations illustrate how the scenario axes are practised by professional futurists and show that the scenario axes do not function as a unifying structure fostering alignment of different perspectives in the way that scenario theorists and practitioners often suggest. Instead, not one, but three different applications and interpretations of functional meaning of the scenario axes co-existed: the scenario axes as a ‘backbone’, as a ‘building scaffold’ and as ‘foundation’.

[1]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[2]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[3]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[5]  Gill Ringland,et al.  Scenarios in Public Policy , 2002 .

[6]  James Austin Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts: by Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1979. , 1982 .

[7]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[8]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[9]  P. '. Hart,et al.  Understanding policy fiascoes , 1995 .

[10]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modelling , 2002 .

[11]  W. W. Wagar,et al.  Foundations of Future Studies: Human Science for a New Era , 1998 .

[12]  Sandra Braman,et al.  The Policy Orientation , 2003 .

[13]  P. V. Notten,et al.  Writing on the Wall: Scenario Development in Times of Discontinuity , 2005 .

[14]  P. V. Notten,et al.  The Future Shocks: On the Role of Discontinuity in Scenario Development , 2005 .

[15]  Peter Schwartz,et al.  The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World , 1996 .

[16]  Osmo Kuusi Expertise in the Future Use of Generic Technologies , 1999 .

[17]  Bertrand de Jouvenel,et al.  The Art of Conjecture. , 1968 .

[18]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The Policy Sciences , 1953 .

[19]  R. Lempert,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis , 2003 .