Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds.

The SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) effect refers to the finding that small numbers facilitate left responses, whereas larger numbers facilitate right responses. The development of this spatial association was studied in 7-, 8-, and 9-year-olds, as well as in adults, using a task where number magnitude was essential to perform the task and another task where number magnitude was irrelevant. When number magnitude was essential, a SNARC effect was found in all age groups. But when number magnitude was irrelevant, a SNARC effect was found only in 9-year-olds and adults. These results are taken to suggest that (a) 7-year-olds represent number magnitudes in a way similar to that of adults and that (b) when perceiving Arabic numerals, children have developed automatic access to magnitude information by around 9 years of age.

[1]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  Jamie I. D. Campbell.  Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[3]  Laurence Rousselle,et al.  Magnitude Representation in Children , 2004 .

[4]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Spatial representations in number processing--evidence from a pointing task , 2003 .

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. Dixon,et al.  Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 2001 .

[7]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Crossed Hands and the Snarc Effect: Afailure to Replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993) , 2006, Cortex.

[8]  W Fias,et al.  Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Children's Judgments of Numerical Inequality. , 1977 .

[10]  Florian Koppelstaetter,et al.  Neural correlates of the number–size interference task in children , 2006, Neuroreport.

[11]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Automaticity in Processing Ordinal Information , 2004 .

[12]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Wim Fias,et al.  Spatial representation of numbers. , 2004 .

[15]  R Sun,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2006 .

[16]  Wim Fias,et al.  Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[17]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  W. Fias,et al.  Number sense in children with visuospatial disabilities: Orientation of the mental number line , 2005 .

[20]  L Girelli,et al.  The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults , 2005, Neuroreport.

[22]  B. Tversky,et al.  Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Wim Fias,et al.  Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[25]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[27]  W. Schwarz,et al.  Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[29]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  Xinlin Zhou,et al.  Chinese kindergartners’ automatic processing of numerical magnitude in Stroop-like tasks , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  Even Early Representations of Numerical Magnitude are Spatially Organized: Evidence for a Directional Magnitude Bias in Pre-Reading Preschoolers , 2006 .

[32]  E. M. Duncan,et al.  Isolating the effects of symbolic distance, and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[33]  W. Fias,et al.  Semantic Influences on Feature-Based Attention Due to Overlap of Neural Circuits , 2002, Cortex.

[34]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information , 1992 .

[36]  Denise H. Wu,et al.  Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers , 2008, Cognition.

[37]  Wim Fias,et al.  Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[39]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[40]  W. Fias.  The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[41]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic activation of internal magnitudes: a study of developmental dyscalculia. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[42]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.