Using deep learning to detect oesophageal lesions in PET-CT

PET-CT scans using 18F-FDG are increasingly used to detect cancer, but interpretation can be challenging due to non-specific uptake and complex anatomical structures nearby. To aide this process, we investigate the potential of automated detection of lesions in 18F-FDG scans using deep learning tools. A 5-layer convolutional neural network (CNN) with 2x2 kernels, rectified linear unit (ReLU) activations and two dense layers was trained to detect cancerous lesions in 2D axial image segments from PET scans. Pre-contoured scans from a retrospective cohort study of 480 oesophageal cancer patients were split 80:10:10 into training, validation and test sets. These were then used to generate a total of ~14000 45×45 pixel image segments, where tumor present segments were centered on the marked lesion, and tumor absent segments were randomly located outside the marked lesion. ROC curves generated from the training and validation datasets produced an average AUC of ~<95%.

[1]  Christian Roux,et al.  A Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian Segmentation Approach for Volume Determination in PET , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  S. Goldman,et al.  The role of PET scan in the preoperative management of oesophageal cancer. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  Andreas Bockisch,et al.  Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Chandrasekhar Bal,et al.  Role of F18-FDG PET/CT in the Staging and Restaging of Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison with CECT , 2011, Indian journal of surgical oncology.

[5]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[6]  Anne Bol,et al.  A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  Christopher Marshall,et al.  Development and validation of a prognostic model incorporating texture analysis derived from standardised segmentation of PET in patients with oesophageal cancer , 2017, European Radiology.

[8]  Martín Abadi,et al.  TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems , 2016, ArXiv.

[9]  W. Roa,et al.  Iterative threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  M. Miften,et al.  A region growing method for tumor volume segmentation on PET images for rectal and anal cancer patients. , 2009, Medical physics.

[11]  G. Bonniaud,et al.  /sup 18/F-FDG PET images segmentation using morphological watershed: a phantom study , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  Sebastian Ruder,et al.  An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms , 2016, Vestnik komp'iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii.

[13]  Martin Weiß,et al.  An improvement of the convergence proof of the ADAM-Optimizer , 2018, ArXiv.

[14]  Christopher Marshall,et al.  ATLAAS: an automatic decision tree-based learning algorithm for advanced image segmentation in positron emission tomography , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET. , 2010, Medical physics.

[16]  Barton F Branstetter,et al.  Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 1. Physiologic, altered physiologic, and artifactual FDG uptake. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  F Dehdashti,et al.  Staging of esophageal cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.