Data Analytics in Citizen Cyberscience: Evaluating Participant Learning and Engagement with Analytics

Citizen Cyberscience (CCS) projects are online projects that engage participants with no necessary prior scientific experience in online tasks of very varied types and that contribute to the scientific research in different domains. Many research studies confirm the usefulness of CCS projects to researchers while less has been done to explore their added-value for the participants. Specifically, we are interested to know to what extent CCS projects help participants learn while participating through typically small-sized and very specific tasks. We propose in this work to include another source of quantitative data to the research toolbox usually used to evaluate learning in informal learning contexts as the context of citizen science. This data source is learning analytics that makes use of the already very ubiquitous web analytics and that is heavily used in varied online learning environments. Based on our experience with two CCS pilot projects, we created a framework to help CCS project designers properly implement learning analytics in their project in order to make the full use of these analytics and integrate them with other sources of quantitative data related to the user experience. We apply the proposed framework to explore the interaction between learning and engagement in two pilot CCS projects of different types: volunteer thinking and gaming. We conclude with a number of recommendations to avoid pitfalls and proposals for best practice based on our experience.

[1]  Rebecca Jordan,et al.  The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy , 2013, Public understanding of science.

[2]  William A. Kahn Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[3]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[4]  Jose Luis Fernandez-Marquez,et al.  CCLTracker Framework: Monitoring user learning and activity in web based citizen science projects , 2016, Hum. Comput..

[5]  Julia Parker All for One and One for All , 1998 .

[6]  Elaine Toms,et al.  What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[8]  Rebecca Jordan,et al.  Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen‐science learning outcomes , 2012 .

[9]  Julien Da Costa,et al.  Not so passive: engagement and learning in Volunteer Computing projects , 2016, Hum. Comput..

[10]  George Siemens,et al.  Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education , 2014 .

[11]  Karolin Papst,et al.  Rapid Instructional Design Learning Id Fast And Right , 2016 .

[12]  L. Morris,et al.  Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  H. Sauermann,et al.  Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  C. Cooper,et al.  Is there a weekend bias in clutch-initiation dates from citizen science? Implications for studies of avian breeding phenology , 2014, International Journal of Biometeorology.

[15]  R. Jordan,et al.  Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  Jody W. Enck,et al.  Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[17]  E. Hand,et al.  Citizen science: People power , 2010, Nature.

[18]  Mads Kock Pedersen,et al.  Getting Humans to do Quantum Optimization - User Acquisition, Engagement and Early Results from the Citizen Cyberscience Game Quantum Moves , 2014, Hum. Comput..

[19]  Pietro Michelucci,et al.  Synthesis and Taxonomy of Human Computation , 2013, Handbook of Human Computation.

[20]  R. Cronje,et al.  Does Participation in Citizen Science Improve Scientific Literacy? A Study to Compare Assessment Methods , 2011 .

[21]  Lesandro Ponciano,et al.  Finding Volunteers' Engagement Profiles in Human Computation for Citizen Science Projects , 2014, Hum. Comput..

[22]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Learning by volunteer computing, thinking and gaming: What and how are volunteers learning by participating in Virtual Citizen Science? , 2013 .

[24]  Tanya Elias,et al.  Learning Analytics: Definitions, Processes and Potential , 2011 .

[25]  R. Bonney,et al.  Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project , 2005 .

[26]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Creativity in Citizen Cyberscience , 2016, Hum. Comput..

[27]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .