Auxílio multicritério à decisão aplicado ao planejamento e gestão na indústria de petróleo e gás

The application of multicriteria methods in the planning and management of the oil and gas industry has been studied by various authors. However, these studies are distributed in a scattered manner in the literature, which creates difficulties in obtaining an overview. To provide a systematic view on this matter, this paper presents a bibliographical mapping of papers that approach the use of multicriteria methods for planning and management in the oil and gas industry. The reviewed documents were selected through a search in the Scopus and ISI (Web of Knowledge) databases. Among the study results, it is found that the most commonly used multicriteria method was AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Furthermore, it is observed that the majority of multicriteria method applications are related to oil, midstream activities and onshore facilities.

[1]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating Utility Theory , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Metin Celik,et al.  Use of an ANP to prioritize managerial responsibilities of maritime stakeholders in environmental incidents: An oil spill case , 2009 .

[3]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique , 2006 .

[4]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Project risk management: a combined analytic hierarchy process and decision tree approach , 2002 .

[5]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  A risk‐based model for inspection and maintenance of cross‐country petroleum pipeline , 2001 .

[6]  Abdulaziz S. Alidi,et al.  A multiobjective optimization model for the waste management of the petrochemical industry , 1996 .

[7]  Maryam Ramezani,et al.  Design a new mixed expert decision aiding system using fuzzy ELECTRE III method for vendor selection , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  O. P. Gandhi,et al.  Safety assessment of lubricating oil using AHP and vector projection method , 2008 .

[9]  Miguel Edgar Morales Udaeta,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF THE EXPANSION OF NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION NETWORK BY THE URBAN DYNAMICS , 2010 .

[10]  Prasanta Kumar Dey.  Integrated approach to project feasibility analysis: a case study , 2001 .

[11]  Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas,et al.  Prioritization of enterprise resource planning systems criteria: Focusing on construction industry , 2012 .

[12]  Yong Shi,et al.  Multiobjective linear programming model on injection oilfield recovery system , 1998 .

[13]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) , 2006 .

[14]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Wang Wei-qiang.  Risk Management and Emergency Response of Oil Pipeline Based on Web GIS , 2011 .

[16]  Yang Xin.  Fuzzy math evaluation method for China's international oil investments , 2006 .

[17]  Nikolaos Voulvoulis,et al.  Improving petroleum contaminated land remediation decision-making through the MCA weighting process. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[18]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Jianfeng Li,et al.  An evaluation of maintenance strategy using risk based inspection , 2011 .

[20]  Weiqiang Wang,et al.  Research on the Risk Grading Division of Oil and Gas Pipeline Based on WebGIS , 2009 .

[21]  R. Sadiq,et al.  Evaluation of Generic Types of Drilling Fluid Using a Risk-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2003, Environmental management.

[22]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Risk assessment for Liwan relief well in South China Sea , 2012 .

[23]  Morteza Pakdin Amiri,et al.  Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Decision support system for pipeline route selection , 1999 .

[25]  R. M. Chandima Ratnayake,et al.  Technical integrity management: measuring HSE awareness using AHP in selecting a maintenance strategy , 2010 .

[26]  Maurizio Bevilacqua,et al.  A combined goal programming - AHP approach to maintenance selection problem , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Z Hui.  SCREENING THE KEY TECHNIQUES FOR OIL & GAS DRILLING IN CONSIDERATION OF SAFETY , 2005 .

[28]  J Wang,et al.  A design—decision support framework for evaluation of design options/proposals using a composite structure methodology based on the approximate reasoning approach and the evidential reasoning method , 2003 .

[29]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Project risk management in analytic framework , 2005 .

[30]  David J. Barnes,et al.  A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains , 2011 .

[31]  Pieter H. A. J. M. van Gelder,et al.  Decision Analysis Framework for Risk Management of Crude Oil Pipeline System , 2011, Adv. Decis. Sci..

[32]  Ming Yang,et al.  Prioritization of environmental issues in offshore oil and gas operations: A hybrid approach using fuzzy inference system and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2011 .

[33]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Ship selection using a multiple-criteria synthesis approach , 2008 .

[34]  H R Jafari,et al.  RISK ASSESSMENT OF INDUSTRIAL SITES OF ASALOUYE BY USING AHP TECHNIQUE AND GIS , 2009 .

[35]  Helder Gomes Costa.  Modelo para webibliomining: proposta e caso de aplicação , 2010 .

[36]  Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel,et al.  Multicriteria analysis of natural gas destination in Brazil: An application of the TODIM method , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[37]  Zhang Cheng-ping.  THE TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC SYNTHETICAL ESTIMATING OF LUODAI NATURAL GAS FIELD REBUILDING , 2005 .

[38]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Petroleum pipeline construction planning: a conceptual framework , 1996 .

[39]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[40]  Brian Veitch,et al.  RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING FOR DRILLING WASTE DISCHARGES USING A FUZZY SYNTHETIC EVALUATION TECHNIQUE , 2004 .

[41]  Jouzi Seyed Ali,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF GAS PIPELINES BY USING OF AHP COMBINED METHOD , 2010 .

[42]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process Analyzes Risk of Operating Cross-Country Petroleum Pipelines in India , 2003 .

[43]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Decision support system for inspection and maintenance: a case study of oil pipelines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[44]  T. Yomralioglu,et al.  NABUCCO Pipeline Route Selection through Turkey Comparison of a GIS-based Approach to a Traditional Route Selection Approach , 2011 .

[45]  Helder Gomes Costa,et al.  Métodos de auxílio multicritério à decisão aplicados a problemas de PCP: mapeamento da produção em periódicos publicados no Brasil , 2013 .

[46]  Liang Guang,et al.  APPLICATION OF AHP ON THE CHOICE OF PIPELINE'S RIVER -ACROSSING PROJECT , 2005 .