Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy
暂无分享,去创建一个
Christina Demski | Catherine Butler | Karen Parkhill | Alexa Spence | A. Spence | Christina Demski | N. Pidgeon | K. Parkhill | C. Butler | Nick Pidgeon
[1] C. Teddlie,et al. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .
[2] R. Kasperson. Six propositions on public participation and their relevance for risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[3] B. Fischhoff,et al. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks , 2011 .
[4] Andrea Ramírez,et al. Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options , 2009 .
[5] S. Jasanoff. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .
[6] Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al. Transforming the UK energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability: summary findings from a survey conducted August 2012 , 2013 .
[7] Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al. Transforming the UK energy system: public values, attitudes and acceptability: synthesis report , 2013 .
[8] R. Keeney,et al. Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions , 1990 .
[9] Amanda M. Thomson,et al. Projections of emissions and removals from the LULUCF sector to 2050. Contract report for the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) , 2011 .
[10] Andrew Stirling,et al. Keep it complex , 2010, Nature.
[11] Javier Lezaun,et al. Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics , 2007 .
[12] P. Simmons,et al. Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste , 2008, Public understanding of science.
[13] Amanda D. Boyd,et al. Assessing socio-technical mindsets: Public deliberations on carbon capture and storage in the context of energy sources and climate change , 2013 .
[14] P. Macnaghten. Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making: Narrative Structures, Public Responses, and Emerging Nanotechnologies , 2010 .
[15] Cynthia Selin,et al. Energy Futures: Five Dilemmas of the Practice of Anticipatory Governance , 2012 .
[16] E. Rosa. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk , 1998 .
[17] N. Pidgeon,et al. Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? , 2007 .
[18] M. Morris. Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .
[19] Robin Gregory,et al. Exploring a structured decision approach as a means of fostering participatory space policy making at NASA , 2002 .
[20] P. Stern,et al. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making , 2008 .
[21] A. Spence,et al. Psychology, Climate Change & Sustainable Bahaviour , 2009 .
[22] Robin Gregory,et al. Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.
[23] Clark A. Miller. The Dynamics of Framing Environmental Values and Policy: Four Models of Societal Processes , 2000, Environmental Values.
[24] David Isaacs,et al. The World Café: Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter , 2005 .
[25] B. Johnson. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2002 .
[26] Dirk Scheer,et al. Public evaluation of electricity technologies and future low-carbon portfolios in Germany and the USA , 2013 .
[27] Thomas Dietz,et al. Bringing values and deliberation to science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[28] J. Olsen,et al. The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.
[29] Robin Gregory,et al. Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach , 1993 .
[30] Lauren A. Mayer,et al. The 'Mental Models' Methodology for Developing Communications , 2014 .
[31] James Wilsdon,et al. See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .
[32] Paul Upham,et al. Public Attitudes to and Engagement with Low-Carbon Energy , 2011 .
[33] W. Poortinga,et al. The British 2001 Foot and Mouth crisis: a comparative study of public risk perceptions, trust and beliefs about government policy in two communities , 2004 .
[34] M Granger Morgan,et al. Informed Public Preferences for Electricity Portfolios with CCS and Other Low‐Carbon Technologies , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[35] K. Chan,et al. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .
[36] A. Stirling. Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology , 2005 .
[37] I. Fischhoff,et al. Publics' Opinions About Biotechnologies , 2001 .
[38] A. Spence,et al. Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change , 2011 .
[39] Barbara Herr Harthorn,et al. Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.
[40] N. Pidgeon,et al. Deliberating Energy System Transitions in the UK , 2013 .
[41] Gene Rowe,et al. Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision Making: The Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[42] Robin Gregory,et al. Decision support for developing energy strategies , 2012 .
[43] Ortwin Renn,et al. Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public , 1992 .
[44] David J. C. MacKay. Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air , 2008 .
[45] P. Slovic. The Construction of Preference , 1995 .
[46] T. Webler,et al. Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .
[47] Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al. Transforming the UK Energy System : Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability - Deliberating Energy System Transitions in the UK , 2013 .
[48] Roland W. Scholz,et al. Supporting energy initiatives in small communities by linking visions with energy scenarios and multi-criteria assessment , 2011 .
[49] John Turnpenny,et al. Noisy and definitely not normal: responding to wicked issues in the environment, energy and health , 2009 .
[50] H. Fineberg,et al. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .
[51] J. Davis. Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed.). , 2021 .
[52] Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al. Grounded theory in psychological research. , 2003 .
[53] P. Upham,et al. Scaffolding, software and scenarios: Applying Bruner's learning theory to energy scenario development with the public , 2014 .
[54] Thomas C. Beierle. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .
[55] P. Slovic,et al. The Construction of Preference: Index , 2006 .
[56] A. Corner,et al. Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project , 2013 .
[57] T. Brown,et al. The Concept of Value in Resource Allocation , 2016 .
[58] Brian Wynne,et al. Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake , 2007 .