Discovery of NMDA Glycine Site Inhibitors from the Chemical Universe Database GDB

Drug development faces the ever-increasing challenge of discovering new bioactive small molecules that have not already been investigated in the more than 150-year history of medicinal chemistry. [1] This problem is particularly critical for drug targets that require very small organic ligands, for which the range of potential structures is limited. One possible way to overcome this difficulty would be to search through the entire chemical space of these small molecules using virtual screening tools and to identify promising ligands for synthesis and testing. Herein we report the first example of such an approach for ligands of the N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor glycine site. This receptor is an important drug target implicated in synaptic plasticity, neuronal development, learning, and memory. Inhibiting the NMDA receptor may help prevent neuronal cell death caused by glutamate excitotoxicity in acute and chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as stroke, epilepsy, Huntington’s, and Alzheimer’s disease. [2] Starting with our recently reported chemical universe database (GDB) that lists all compounds of C, N, O, and F up to 11 atoms obeying simple stability and synthetic feasibility rules, [3] we show that virtual screening followed by synthesis and testing leads to several new NMDA glycine site ligands. Both ligand binding assays and functional investigations reveal that the identified ligands interact with the glycine binding site of the NDMA receptors, inhibiting receptor function by direct competition with glycine. The crystal structure of the NMDA receptor glycine site was recently reported. [4] Glycine is bound through a series of hydrogen bonds at the bottom of a narrow channel, leaving limited free space. The known NMDA glycine site ligands are indeed very small analogues of glycine, such as d-alanine and dserine, [5] d-cycloserine, [6] and small cyclic amino acids, [7] sug

[1]  R. Dingledine,et al.  Requirement for glycine in activation of NMDA-receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. , 1988, Science.

[2]  J. Monahan,et al.  d-Cycloserine: A ligand for the N-methyl-d-aspartate coupled glycine receptor has partial agonist characteristics , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  D. Choi,et al.  The role of glutamate neurotoxicity in hypoxic-ischemic neuronal death. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  P. Ascher,et al.  Competitive antagonists and partial agonists at the glycine modulatory site of the mouse N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J. Olney,et al.  Excitotoxic amino acids and neuropsychiatric disorders. , 1990, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[6]  G. B. Watson,et al.  Pharmacological characteristics of cyclic homologues of glycine at the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-associated glycine site , 1990, Neuropharmacology.

[7]  J. Olney,et al.  NMDA antagonist neurotoxicity: mechanism and prevention. , 1991, Science.

[8]  S. Urwyler,et al.  Biochemical and thermodynamic aspects of the binding of [3H]glycine to its strychnine-insensitive recognition site associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex. , 1992, Biochemical pharmacology.

[9]  J. Gasteiger,et al.  FROM ATOMS AND BONDS TO THREE-DIMENSIONAL ATOMIC COORDINATES : AUTOMATIC MODEL BUILDERS , 1993 .

[10]  P. Wood The co-agonist concept: is the NMDA-associated glycine receptor saturated in vivo? , 1995, Life sciences.

[11]  T. Smart Regulation of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter-gated ion channels by protein phosphorylation , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[13]  J. Kemp,et al.  NMDA receptor pathways as drug targets , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  A guide to drug discovery: Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  R. Didziapetris,et al.  Fragmental methods in the analysis of biological activities of diverse compound sets. , 2003, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Eric Gouaux,et al.  Mechanisms of activation, inhibition and specificity: crystal structures of the NMDA receptor NR1 ligand‐binding core , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[17]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Molecular Similarity Searching Using Atom Environments, Information-Based Feature Selection, and a Naïve Bayesian Classifier , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  J. Reymond,et al.  Synthesis and esterolytic activity of catalytic peptide dendrimers. , 2004, Chemistry.

[19]  P. Willett,et al.  Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[20]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Virtual exploration of the small-molecule chemical universe below 160 Daltons. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.

[22]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[24]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Virtual Exploration of the Chemical Universe up to 11 Atoms of C, N, O, F: Assembly of 26.4 Million Structures (110.9 Million Stereoisomers) and Analysis for New Ring Systems, Stereochemistry, Physicochemical Properties, Compound Classes, and Drug Discovery , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  N. Franks General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.