Norm-Establishing and Norm-Following in Autonomous Agency

Living agency is subject to a normative dimension (good-bad, adaptive-maladaptive) that is absent from other types of interaction. We review current and historical attempts to naturalize normativity from an organism-centered perspective, identifying two central problems and their solution: (1) How to define the topology of the viability space so as to include a sense of gradation that permits reversible failure, and (2) how to relate both the processes that establish norms and those that result in norm-following behavior. We present a minimal metabolic system that is coupled to a gradient-climbing chemotactic mechanism. Studying the relationship between metabolic dynamics and environmental resource conditions, we identify an emergent viable region and a precarious region where the system tends to die unless environmental conditions change. We introduce the concept of normative field as the change of environmental conditions required to bring the system back to its viable region. Norm-following, or normative action, is defined as the course of behavior whose effect is positively correlated with the normative field. We close with a discussion of the limitations and extensions of our model and some final reflections on the nature of norms and teleology in agency.

[1]  W. Cannon The Wisdom of the Body , 1932 .

[2]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[3]  J. Collier,et al.  Autonomy and Process Closure as the Basis for Functionality , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive: A Minimally Cognitive Organization Program , 2006, Adapt. Behav..

[5]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo Unbinding Biological Autonomy: Francisco Varela's Contributions to Artificial Life , 2004, Artificial Life.

[6]  F. Gzil Introduction à l'étude de la médecine expérimentale , 2008 .

[7]  M. Bickhard The biological foundations of cognitive science , 2009 .

[8]  F. Varela Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[9]  R. Millikan In Defense of Proper Functions , 1989, Philosophy of Science.

[10]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  The Process Dynamics of Normative Function , 2002 .

[11]  S. Kauffman Autocatalytic sets of proteins. , 1986 .

[12]  Harry G. Frankfurt,et al.  The importance of what we care about: The problem of action , 1988 .

[13]  H. Ingmer,et al.  Energy Taxis Drives Campylobacter jejuni toward the Most Favorable Conditions for Growth , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  Christopher Alexander THE PHENOMENON OF LIFE , 2020, The Nature of Order, Book 1: The Phenomenon of Life.

[15]  D. Frisby,et al.  Towards a Transformation of Philosophy , 2023 .

[16]  Marina Basu The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[17]  D. Enoch Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won't Come from What is Constitutive of Action , 2006 .

[18]  Jean-Pierre Aubin,et al.  Viability Theory: New Directions , 2011 .

[19]  B. Fernández,et al.  Mental life. A naturalized approach to the autonomy of cognitive agents , 2008 .

[20]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Modelling autonomy: Simulating the essence of life and cognition , 2008, Biosyst..

[21]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[22]  N. Virgo Thermodynamics and the structure of living systems , 2011 .

[23]  H. Jonas The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology , 1966 .

[24]  Douglas Lavin,et al.  On the Problem of Action , 2012 .

[25]  W. Ashby,et al.  Design for a brain; the origin of adaptive behavior , 2011 .

[26]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency , 2005 .

[27]  Alvaro Moreno,et al.  Searching for the roots of autonomy: The natural and artificial paradigms revisited , 2000 .

[28]  A. Cornish-Bowden,et al.  Organizational invariance and metabolic closure: analysis in terms of (M,R) systems. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  J. Skewes,et al.  Bio-agency and the problem of action , 2009 .

[30]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[31]  Paul Bourgine,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 2004, Artificial Life.

[32]  H. Heller,et al.  Principles of Life , 2010 .

[33]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Defining Agency: Individuality, Normativity, Asymmetry, and Spatio-temporality in Action , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[34]  David McFarland,et al.  Animal Behaviour Psychobiology, Ethology, and Evolution , 1985 .

[35]  J. Todd,et al.  INVESTIGATIONS , 1984, The Lancet.

[36]  G. Canguilhem,et al.  On the Normal and the Pathological , 1978 .

[37]  G. Alexandre Coupling metabolism and chemotaxis-dependent behaviours by energy taxis receptors. , 2010, Microbiology.

[38]  Tomasz Korbak,et al.  Scaffolded Minds And The Evolution Of Content In Signaling Pathways , 2015 .

[39]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  A Minimal Model of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  M. Bedau Measurement of Evolutionary Activity, Teleology, and Life , 1996 .

[41]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Behavioral Metabolution: The Adaptive and Evolutionary Potential of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis , 2011, Artificial Life.

[42]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Characterizing Autopoiesis in the Game of Life , 2015, Artificial Life.

[43]  A. Moreno,et al.  An Organizational Account of Biological Functions , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[44]  Hugues Bersini Reinforcement learning for homeostatic endogenous variables , 1994 .

[45]  Kepa Ruiz-Mirazo,et al.  Basic Autonomy as a Fundamental Step in the Synthesis of Life , 2004, Artificial Life.

[46]  K. Ruiz-Mirazo,et al.  A Universal Definition of Life: Autonomy and Open-Ended Evolution , 2004, Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere.

[47]  Nathaniel Virgo,et al.  Complex Autocatalysis in Simple Chemistries , 2016, Artificial Life.

[48]  Alvaro Moreno,et al.  Autonomy in evolution: from minimal to complex life , 2012, Synthese.

[49]  J. Habermas Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action , 1990 .

[50]  G. Canguilhem Le Normal et le Pathologique , 1978 .

[51]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The dynamics of adaptive behavior: A research program , 1997, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[52]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Artificial Life II , 1991 .

[53]  Matthew D. Egbert,et al.  Adaptation from interactions between metabolism and behaviour : self-sensitive behaviour in protocells , 2012 .

[54]  N. Boyce Life itself , 2018, The Lancet.

[55]  Michael Eisenbach,et al.  A hitchhiker's guide through advances and conceptual changes in chemotaxis , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[56]  William Bechtel,et al.  Biological mechanisms: organized to maintain autonomy , 2007 .

[57]  J. Gayon,et al.  The Concept of Individuality in Canguilhem's Philosophy of Biology , 1998, Journal of the history of biology.

[58]  W. Christensen,et al.  Autonomy and the emergence of intelligence: Organised interactive construction , 2000 .

[59]  D. Davidson Actions, Reasons, And Causes , 1980 .

[60]  Erik Rietveld Situated normativity: The normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action , 2008 .

[61]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Adaptivity: From Metabolism to Behavior , 2008, Adapt. Behav..

[62]  Federico Morán,et al.  A Simple Self-Maintaining Metabolic System: Robustness, Autocatalysis, Bistability , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[63]  Stuart Kauffman,et al.  Molecular autonomous agents , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[64]  Fabio Mavelli,et al.  On the way towards 'basic autonomous agents': Stochastic simulations of minimal lipid-peptide cells , 2008, Biosyst..

[65]  A. Chemero,et al.  Dynamics , Agency and Intentional Action , 2011 .

[66]  Tyler Burge,et al.  Primitive Agency and Natural Norms , 2009 .

[67]  Matthew D. Egbert,et al.  Adapting to Adaptations: Behavioural Strategies that are Robust to Mutations and Other Organisational-Transformations , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[68]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Exploring the Space of Viable Configurations in a Model of Metabolism–Boundary Co-construction , 2016, Artificial Life.

[69]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Chemo-ethology of an Adaptive Protocell - Sensorless Sensitivity to Implicit Viability Conditions , 2009, ECAL.

[70]  Sebastian G. Rand Organism, normativity, plasticity: Canguilhem, Kant, Malabou , 2011 .

[71]  H. Jonas,et al.  Biological Foundations of Individuality , 1968 .