Incorporating Task Analysis in the Design of a Tool for a Complex and Exploratory Search Task

Due to its nature, a complex and exploratory search task is not directly actionable; it needs to be decomposed into actionable sub-tasks. Achieving this decomposition is usually not trivial for non-expert users. Also, the users need additional support to decrease their cognitive workload, regardless of their experience level. A tool designed for a specific task should handle the above issues. In this paper, we present a design approach that can help achieve this, and exemplify this approach using the search task of patent infringement discovery. We apply hierarchical task analysis to analyze a successful goal decomposition scenario for the task. This kind of decomposition makes explicit the tasks that are most responsible for the cognitive workload of the user. We then apply cognitive analysis to reveal the knowledge that enables such decomposition. Finally, we use these findings to design the tool in a way that reduces the load on the user and enables achieving decomposition for non-expert users.

[1]  Wim Vanderbauwhede,et al.  Search system requirements of patent analysts , 2010, SIGIR '10.

[2]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Patent Retrieval , 2013, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[3]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Incorporating Goal Analysis in Database Design: A Case Study from Biological Data Management , 2006, 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06).

[4]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  The effect of user characteristics on search effectiveness in information retrieval , 2011, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Helping people find what they don't know , 2000, CACM.

[7]  John Tait,et al.  Current Challenges in Patent Information Retrieval , 2011, The Information Retrieval Series.

[8]  Tao Li,et al.  Patent Mining: A Survey , 2015, SKDD.

[9]  Walid Magdy,et al.  Toward Higher Effectiveness for Recall- Oriented Information Retrieval: A Patent Retrieval Case Study , 2012 .

[10]  Elaine Toms Complex Tools for Complex Tasks , 2015, SCST@ECIR.

[11]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Separating the knowledge layers: Cognitive analysis of search knowledge through hierarchical goal decompositions , 2005, ASIST.

[12]  Yi Chang,et al.  Relevance Ranking for Vertical Search Engines , 2014 .

[13]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  The human element: helping people find what they don't know. , 2000 .

[14]  Sotirios Liaskos,et al.  The Mysteries of Goal Decomposition , 2011, iStar.

[15]  Axel van Lamsweerde,et al.  Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour , 2001, RE.

[16]  Wim Vanderbauwhede,et al.  A survey of patent users: an analysis of tasks, behavior, search functionality and system requirements , 2010, IIiX.

[17]  J. Armstrong The Use of the Decomposition Principle in Making Judgments , 1975 .

[18]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Exploratory search , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide To Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group , 1992 .

[20]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Automatic query generation for patent search , 2009, CIKM.