Anticipatory movement compatibility for virtual reality interaction devices

In the present study, we examined the impact of movement compatibility on the usability of two interaction devices for virtual reality (VR). To this end, we compared performance with the isometric spacemouse with that with the isotonic flystick, assuming that the flystick induces more movement compatibility in continuous movement and thus results in better performance. In the study, 28 subjects performed an object rotation task on a holobench with the two devices. Additionally, rotation axis and rotation degree were varied. Results showed a notable advantage for the flystick with regard to handling time (the time from the beginning of the object's appearance until the end of rotation, determined by subjects). The data support the idea that the compatibility of motor movements with the resulting (i.e. anticipated) object movements is an important determinant of usability in VR environments.

[1]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[2]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Depth Perception in Virtual Reality: Distance Estimations in Peri- and Extrapersonal Space , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[3]  Gerrit Voss,et al.  An intuitive VR user interface for design review , 2000, AVI '00.

[4]  Eric Bergman,et al.  Introduction to Human Factors , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[5]  Shumin Zhai.  Investigation of Feel for 6DOF Inputs: Isometric and Elastic Rate Control for Manipulation in 3D Environments , 1993 .

[6]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[7]  M. Wexler,et al.  Movement prediction and movement production. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Mental and manual rotation. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Heim.  Virtual Realism , 1998 .

[11]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human performance evaluation of manipulation schemes in virtual environments , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[12]  Christophe Chaillou,et al.  Effects of DOF separation on elastic devices for the navigation in 3D virtual environments with force feedback , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[13]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Interacting With Notebook Input Devices: An Analysis of Motor Performance and Users' Expertise , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[14]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[15]  Christophe Chaillou,et al.  Does DOF Separation on Elastic Devices Improve User 3D Steering Task Performance? , 2004, APCHI.

[16]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipatory control of actions , 2004 .

[17]  Philippe Coiffet,et al.  Virtual Reality Technology , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  The ideomotor principle and motor sequence acquisition: Tone effects facilitate movement chunking , 2004, Psychological research.

[19]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli , 2006 .

[20]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Mental and manual rotation , 1998 .

[21]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  A comparison of position and rate control for telemanipulations with consideration of manipulator system dynamics , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[23]  Effie Lai-Chong Law,et al.  Analyses of user rationality and system learnability: performing task variants in user tests , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Yohtaro Takano,et al.  Mental Rotation , 2008 .

[25]  Angelos Amditis,et al.  Human centred design of 3-D interaction devices to control virtual environments , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  C. B. Gibbs.  The continuous regulation of skilled response by kinaesthetic feed back. , 1954, The British journal of medical psychology.

[27]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[28]  Stig Ottosson,et al.  Virtual reality in the product development process , 2002 .

[29]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application , 2006 .

[30]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Multistream Input: An Experimental Study of Document Scrolling Methods , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[31]  J M Notterman,et al.  Variables influencing outflow-inflow interpretations tracking performance: predictability of target motion, transfer function, and practice. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Dieter Nattkemper,et al.  The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions , 2004, Psychological research.

[33]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[34]  Alan Lipschultz,et al.  Virtual Reality Technology, 2nd edition , 2004 .

[35]  Sher ry Folsom-Meek,et al.  Human Performance , 2020, Nature.

[36]  Peter E Keller,et al.  The planning and execution of short auditory sequences , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques , 2001, Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ..

[38]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[39]  P. Keller,et al.  Action Planning in Sequential Skills: Relations to Music Performance , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[41]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Motor processes in mental rotation , 1998, Cognition.

[42]  W. Prinz,et al.  The Ideomotor approach to action control: Implications for skilled performance , 2004 .